Skip to main content

Confessions of a Marginal Psychologist

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Path in Psychology ((PATH))

Abstract

My formal introduction to the discipline of psychology was the result not of hopeful enthusiasm, but of purely pragmatic calculation. In 1945, I was a dedicated student of chemistry at the University of Cape Town in what was then the British Dominion of South Africa. I was set on a career as a research scientist that would require further years of study in my chosen field. As the child of parents who had arrived in the country as penniless refugees from Nazi Germany not many years before, I was, however, dependent on scholarship money to continue my scientific training. But scholarship money, at that time and place, was extremely scarce. Only those with the very highest grades had any hope of qualifying. I had been the class medalist in chemistry, but I was now about to prepare for specialization in biochemistry and wanted to minimize demands from other courses that I regarded as mere distractions from my main task. So I asked around about any “soft options” of which I might avail myself. The consensus among my fellow students was quite clear: Psychology was unquestionably the softest of the soft options on offer. And so I enrolled in the introductory psychology course with every intention of keeping my acquaintance with the subject brief and uninvolved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adorno, T. (1955). Zum Verhältnis von Soziologie und Psychologie. In T.W. Adorno & W. Dirks (Eds.) Frankfurter Beiträge zur Soziologie, I (pp.11–45). Frankfurt: Europäische Verlagsanstalt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G.W. et al (1935). Attitudes. In C.A. Murchison (Ed.) Handbook of social psychology (pp. 798–844). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W., Gillespie, J. M. (1955). Youth’s outlook on the future. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, D. (1976). Knowledge and social imagery. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal, A. (1975). A reappraisal of Wilhelm Wundt. American Psychologist, 30, 1081–1086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, A. (1993). Something old, something new: The reappraisal of Wilhelm Wundt in textbooks. Theory and Psychology, 3, 235–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1958).Value differences among South African students. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 57, 339–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1960). Independence training and social class in Java, Indonesia. Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1963b). Ideology and Utopia in South Africa: A methodological contribution to the sociology of knowledge. British Journal of Sociology, 14, 59–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1963c). The psychological future of an oppressed group. Social Forces, 42, 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1971). Socialization: London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1976). Interpersonal communication. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1977). Hostility management and ego involvement in discussion groups. Journal of Social Psychology, 102, 143–148.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1979a). The social origins of modern psychology. In A.R. Buss (Ed.) Psychology in social context (pp. 27–45). New York: Irvington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1979b). The positivist repudiation of Wundt. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 15, 205–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1980). The history of introspection reconsidered. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 16, 240–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1983). Origins of the schema of stimulated motion: Towards a pre–history of modern psychology. History of Science, 21, 183–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1985). The methodological imperative in psychology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 5, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1993). Psychological objects, practice and history. In H. V. Rappard, Rappard, P. J. Strien, L. P. Mos, &W. J. Baker (Eds.), Annals of Theoretical Psychology, Vol 8 (pp. 15–47 & 71–84). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the mind: How psychology found its language. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (2001). Making social psychology experimental: A conceptual history. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 36, 329–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (2002). How old is psychology, particularly concepts of memory? History & Philosophy of Psychology, 4, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, J. A. (1960). The structural basis of behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuPreez, P., Bhana, K., Broekman, N., Louw, J., &Nel, E. M. (1981). Ideology and Utopia revisited. Social Dynamics, 7, 52–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finchilescu, G., & Dawes, A. (1999). Adolescents’ future ideologies through four decades of South African history. Social Dynamics, 25, 98–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, G. (1950). Thinking: An introduction to its experimental psychology. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, M. et al (1936). Studien über Autorität und Familie. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafitte, P. (1957). The person in psychology: Reality or abstraction? London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, P. (1984). The periodic table. New York: Schocken.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCrone, I.D. (1937). Race attitudes in South Africa. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangold, W. (1960). Gegenstand und Methode des Gruppendiskussionsverfahrens. Frankfurter Beiträge zur Soziologie, Vol 9. Frankfurt: Europäische Verlagsanstalt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, K. (1936). Ideology and Utopia. London: Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, K. (1940). Man and society. London: Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D.C. (1953). The achievement motive. New York: Appleton-Century.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D.C. (1961). The achieving society. Princeton, NJ: van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oeser, O. A., & Emery, F. E. (1954). Social structure and personality in a rural community. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oeser, O. A., & Hammond, S. B. (Eds.) (1954). Social structure and personality in a city. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlov, I. P. (1932). The reply of a physiologist to psychologists. Psychological Review, 39, 91–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F. (1958). Personality and sociocultural factors in intergroup attitudes: a cross–national comparison. Conflict Resolution, 2, 29–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, F. (Ed.) (1955). Gruppenexperiment. Frankfurter Beiträge zur Soziologie, Vol 2. Frankfurt: Europäische Verlagsanstalt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, A. (1967). The jail diary of Albie Sachs. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, O. W. (2001). Uncle tungsten: Memories of a chemical boyhood. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. G. (1962). The behavioral basis of perception. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherick, N. E. (1999). James Garden Taylor. History & Philosophy of Psychology, 1, 17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. (1984). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1976). Keywords: a vocabulary of culture and society. London: Fontana/Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Danziger, K. (2009). Confessions of a Marginal Psychologist. In: Mos, L. (eds) History of Psychology in Autobiography. Path in Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-88499-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics