Advertisement

Confessions of a Marginal Psychologist

  • Kurt Danziger
Chapter
Part of the Path in Psychology book series (PATH)

Abstract

My formal introduction to the discipline of psychology was the result not of hopeful enthusiasm, but of purely pragmatic calculation. In 1945, I was a dedicated student of chemistry at the University of Cape Town in what was then the British Dominion of South Africa. I was set on a career as a research scientist that would require further years of study in my chosen field. As the child of parents who had arrived in the country as penniless refugees from Nazi Germany not many years before, I was, however, dependent on scholarship money to continue my scientific training. But scholarship money, at that time and place, was extremely scarce. Only those with the very highest grades had any hope of qualifying. I had been the class medalist in chemistry, but I was now about to prepare for specialization in biochemistry and wanted to minimize demands from other courses that I regarded as mere distractions from my main task. So I asked around about any “soft options” of which I might avail myself. The consensus among my fellow students was quite clear: Psychology was unquestionably the softest of the soft options on offer. And so I enrolled in the introductory psychology course with every intention of keeping my acquaintance with the subject brief and uninvolved.

Keywords

Social Identity Social Consciousness Psychological Science Solitary Confinement Modern Psychology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adorno, T. (1955). Zum Verhältnis von Soziologie und Psychologie. In T.W. Adorno & W. Dirks (Eds.) Frankfurter Beiträge zur Soziologie, I (pp.11–45). Frankfurt: Europäische Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar
  2. Allport, G.W. et al (1935). Attitudes. In C.A. Murchison (Ed.) Handbook of social psychology (pp. 798–844). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Allport, G. W., Gillespie, J. M. (1955). Youth’s outlook on the future. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  4. Bloor, D. (1976). Knowledge and social imagery. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Blumenthal, A. (1975). A reappraisal of Wilhelm Wundt. American Psychologist, 30, 1081–1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brock, A. (1993). Something old, something new: The reappraisal of Wilhelm Wundt in textbooks. Theory and Psychology, 3, 235–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Danziger, K. (1958).Value differences among South African students. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 57, 339–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Danziger, K. (1960). Independence training and social class in Java, Indonesia. Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Danziger, K. (1963b). Ideology and Utopia in South Africa: A methodological contribution to the sociology of knowledge. British Journal of Sociology, 14, 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Danziger, K. (1963c). The psychological future of an oppressed group. Social Forces, 42, 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Danziger, K. (1971). Socialization: London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  12. Danziger, K. (1976). Interpersonal communication. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  13. Danziger, K. (1977). Hostility management and ego involvement in discussion groups. Journal of Social Psychology, 102, 143–148.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Danziger, K. (1979a). The social origins of modern psychology. In A.R. Buss (Ed.) Psychology in social context (pp. 27–45). New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  15. Danziger, K. (1979b). The positivist repudiation of Wundt. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 15, 205–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Danziger, K. (1980). The history of introspection reconsidered. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 16, 240–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Danziger, K. (1983). Origins of the schema of stimulated motion: Towards a pre–history of modern psychology. History of Science, 21, 183–210.Google Scholar
  18. Danziger, K. (1985). The methodological imperative in psychology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 5, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Danziger, K. (1993). Psychological objects, practice and history. In H. V. Rappard, Rappard, P. J. Strien, L. P. Mos, &W. J. Baker (Eds.), Annals of Theoretical Psychology, Vol 8 (pp. 15–47 & 71–84). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  21. Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the mind: How psychology found its language. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Danziger, K. (2001). Making social psychology experimental: A conceptual history. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 36, 329–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Danziger, K. (2002). How old is psychology, particularly concepts of memory? History & Philosophy of Psychology, 4, 1–12.Google Scholar
  24. Deutsch, J. A. (1960). The structural basis of behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960.Google Scholar
  25. DuPreez, P., Bhana, K., Broekman, N., Louw, J., &Nel, E. M. (1981). Ideology and Utopia revisited. Social Dynamics, 7, 52–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Finchilescu, G., & Dawes, A. (1999). Adolescents’ future ideologies through four decades of South African history. Social Dynamics, 25, 98–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Humphrey, G. (1950). Thinking: An introduction to its experimental psychology. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  28. Horkheimer, M. et al (1936). Studien über Autorität und Familie. Paris.Google Scholar
  29. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lafitte, P. (1957). The person in psychology: Reality or abstraction? London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  31. Levi, P. (1984). The periodic table. New York: Schocken.Google Scholar
  32. MacCrone, I.D. (1937). Race attitudes in South Africa. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand Press.Google Scholar
  33. Mangold, W. (1960). Gegenstand und Methode des Gruppendiskussionsverfahrens. Frankfurter Beiträge zur Soziologie, Vol 9. Frankfurt: Europäische Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar
  34. Mannheim, K. (1936). Ideology and Utopia. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  35. Mannheim, K. (1940). Man and society. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  36. McClelland, D.C. (1953). The achievement motive. New York: Appleton-Century.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McClelland, D.C. (1961). The achieving society. Princeton, NJ: van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  38. Oeser, O. A., & Emery, F. E. (1954). Social structure and personality in a rural community. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  39. Oeser, O. A., & Hammond, S. B. (Eds.) (1954). Social structure and personality in a city. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  40. Pavlov, I. P. (1932). The reply of a physiologist to psychologists. Psychological Review, 39, 91–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pettigrew, T. F. (1958). Personality and sociocultural factors in intergroup attitudes: a cross–national comparison. Conflict Resolution, 2, 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  43. Pollock, F. (Ed.) (1955). Gruppenexperiment. Frankfurter Beiträge zur Soziologie, Vol 2. Frankfurt: Europäische Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar
  44. Sachs, A. (1967). The jail diary of Albie Sachs. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  45. Sacks, O. W. (2001). Uncle tungsten: Memories of a chemical boyhood. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  46. Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  47. Taylor, J. G. (1962). The behavioral basis of perception. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Wetherick, N. E. (1999). James Garden Taylor. History & Philosophy of Psychology, 1, 17–33.Google Scholar
  49. Whitley, R. (1984). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  50. Williams, R. (1976). Keywords: a vocabulary of culture and society. London: Fontana/Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kurt Danziger
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychology, York UniversityCanada

Personalised recommendations