Skip to main content

Abstract

We have come to the end of our journey. Through the previous 18 chapters, we studied the historical panorama of the most prominent psychoanalytic developmental theories and their authors whose personal stories influenced the unfolding of their respective models. In our Introduction, we outlined three sets of issues that are central to the construction of a developmental theory. Regarding the methodological problems, we specified three perspectives from which observers may describe psychological phenomena, the descriptive, the interpersonal, and the intrapersonal, i.e., the intrapsychic. We also proposed that it is possible to conceptualize the central organizing feature of a theory as the root metaphor to which the theory adheres, the three primary root metaphors being, the mechanistic, the organismic, and the contextual. Finally, we raised the controversy as to whether we may view developmental theories as paradigms based on positivist perspectives or on social constructivist and hermeneutic perspectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aarsleff, H. (1982). From Locke to Saussure: Essays on the study of language and intellectual history. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Applegate, J. S., & Shapiro, J. R. (2005). Neurobiology for clinical social work: Theory and practice. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arlow, J. A. (1959). Psychoanalysis as scientific method. In H. S. (Ed.), Psychoanalysis scientific method and philosophy (pp. 201–211). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayer, A. J. (1973). The central questions of philosophy. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayer, A. J. (1982). Philosophy in the twentieth century. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, S. (1994). Chaos, self-organization, and psychology. American Psychologist, 49(1), 5–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Basch, M. F. (1978). Psychic determinism and freedom of will. International Review of Psycho-Analysis, 5, 257–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beebe, B., & Lachmann, F. M. (1988). Mother–infant mutual influence and precursors of psychic structure. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Progress in self-psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 3–25). New Jersey: The Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beebe, B., & Lachmann, F. M. (1997). Mother–infant structures and presymbolic self and object representations. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 7, 30–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beebe, B., Rustin, J., Sorter, D., & Knoblauch, S. (2005). An expanded view of forms of intersubjectivity in infancy and their application to psychoanalysis. In B. Beebe, S. Knoblauch, J. Rustin, & D. Sorter (Eds.), Forms of intersubjectivity in infant research and adult treatment (pp. 55–88). New York: Other Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, R. J. (1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science hermeneutics and praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleicher, J. (1980). Contemporary hermeneutics: Hermeneutics as method philosophy and critique. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blight, J. G. (1981). Must psychoanalysis retreat to hermeneutics? Psychoanalytic theory in light of Popper’s evolutionary epistemology. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 4, 147–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1981). Psychoanalysis as a natural science. International Review of Psycho-Analysis, 8, 243–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1984). Psychoanalysis as a natural science. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 1(1), 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buie, D. H. (1981). Empathy: Its nature and limitations. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 29, 281–308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Casti, J. L. (2000). Paradigms regained: A further exploration of the mysteries of modern science. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, B. H. (1997). Hermeneutics and the “relational” turn: Schafer, Ricoeur, Gadmaer, and the nature of psychoanalytic subjectivity. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 20(1), 3–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cozolino, L. (2002). The neuroscience of psychotherapy: Building and rebuilding the brain. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cozolino, L. (2006). The neuroscience of human relationships: Attachment in the developing social brain. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, P. (1991). Ideology obscured: Political uses of the self in Daniel Stern’s infant. American Psychologist, 46(3), 206–219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, H. (1944). The Psychology of women. New York: Grune & Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilthey, W. (1962). Pattern and meaning in history: Thoughts on history and society. New York: Harper Torch Books, The Academy Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Docherty, T. (Ed.). (1993). Postmodernism: A reader. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1891/1953). On aphasia: A critial study (E. Stengle, Trans.). New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1895/1950a). Project for a scientic psychology. In J. Strashey (Ed.), The Standard edition (Vol. I, pp. 283–386). London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1900). The interpretation of dreams. In J. Strashey (Ed.), Standard edition (Vol. 5). London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1914). On narcissism. In J. Strashey (Ed.), Standard edition (Vol. 14, pp. 67–104). London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frie, R., & Orange, D. M. (Eds.). (2009). Beyond Postmodernism: New dimensions in clinical theory and practice. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gay, P. (1988). Freud: A life for our time. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazzaniga, M. S., Ivry, R. B., & Mangun, G. R. (2002). Cognitive neuroscience: The biology of the mind (2nd ed.). New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40(3), 266–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (1998). Social construction and psychoanalytic promise: Commentary on paper by Michael J. Bader. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 8(1), 45–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, M. G. (Ed.). (1977). Metapsychology is not psychology. In Gill, M. M., & Holzman, P. S. (Eds.) Psychology versus Metapsychology, Psychological Issues IX (4). New York: International Universities Press. pp. 71–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, M. G. (1988). Metapsychology revisited. In The annual of psychoanalysis (Vol. 16, pp. 35–48). New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos: Making a new science. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goerner, S. J. (1993). What is chaos? Or, can science’s sense of the world really change? The General Psychologist, 29(3), 87–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A. (2004). David Milrod’s “The Concept of the Self and the Self Representation.” Neuro-Psychoanalysis, 6(1), 91–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenspan, S. I. (1989). The development of the ego: Biological and environmental specificity in the psychopathological developmental process and the selection and construction of ego defenses. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 37(3), 639–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H. E., & Voneche, J. J. (Eds.). (1977). The essential Piaget. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G. (Ed.). (1990). The paradigm dialogue. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, S. A. (1973). Psychonalysis and science: The concept of structure. In The Chicago Institute of Psychoanalysis (Ed.), The Annual of Psychoanalysis (Vol. 1, pp. 73–81). New York: Quadrangle Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, H. (1959). Psychoanalysis as a scientific theory. In S. Hook (Ed.), Psychoanalysis, scientific method and philosophy (pp. 3–37). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, E. (1989). Lost in translation: A life in a new language. New York: E.P. Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, R. R. (1966). A review of some of Freud’s biological assumptions and their influence on his theories. In L. Greenfield (Ed.), Psychoanalysis and current biological thought (pp. 93–124). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, R. R. (1977). Drive or wish? A reconsideration of the psychoanalytic theory of motivation. In M. M. Gill & P. S. Holzman (Eds.), Psychology versus metapsychology (Vol. 9, pp. 158–197). New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, R. R. (1981). The death and transfiguration of metapsychology. International Review of Psycho-Analysis, 8, 129–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, E. R. (1998). A new intellectual framework for psychiatry. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155(4), 457–469.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kernberg, O. F. (1976). Object relations theory and clinical psychoanalysis. New York: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, G. (1976). Psychoanalytic theory: An exploration of essentials. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, G. S. (1973). Two theories or one? Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 37, 99–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, H. (1959). Introspection, empathy and psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 7, 459–483.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1970). Reflections on my critics. In I. Lakatos & Musgrave, A. (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 231–278). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S. (1990). The Making of a constructivist: A Remembrance of transformations past. In E. G. Guba (Ed.), The paradigm dialogue (pp. 67–87). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R. (1973). The working brain: An introduction to neuropsychology. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R. (1979). The making of mind: A personal account of Soviet psychology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madison, G. B. (1988). The hermeneutics of (inter)subjectivity, or: The mind/body problem deconstructed. Man and World, 21, 3–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. L. (2004). Dynamic systems and the therapeutic action of the analyst. In J. Reppen, J. Tucker, & M. A. Schulman (Eds.), Way beyond Freud: Postmodern psychoanalysis observed. London: Open Gate Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller-Vollmer, K. (Ed.). (1986). The hermeneutics reader: Texts of the German tradition from the enlightenment to the present. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nersessian, E., & Solms, M. (Eds.). (1999). Neuro-psychoanalysis: An interdisciplinary journal for psychoanalysis and neuroscience (Vol. I–VIII). Madison, CT: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, R. E. (1969). Hermeneutics: Interpretation theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palombo, J. (2000). Psychoanalysis: A house divided. Psychoanalytic Social Work, 7(1), 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palombo, J. (2006). Nonverbal learning disabilities: A clinical perspective. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palombo, S. R. (1999). The emergent ego: Complexity and coevolution in the psychoanalytic process. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective neuroscience: The foundation of human and animal emotions. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passmore, J. (1985). Recent philosophers. La Salle, IL: Open Court Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D. C. (1990). Postpositivistic science: Myths and realities. In E. G. Guba (Ed.), The paradigm dialogue (pp. 31–45). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. (1991). Hermeneutics in psychoanalysis: Review and reconsideration. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 14(2), 371–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. L. (1981). Piagets theory: A primer. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1970). The place of the sciences of man in the system of sciences. Paris: Mouton/UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1972). The principles of genetic epistemology. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piers, C. (2000). Character as self-organizing complexity. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 23(1), 3–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poincare, H. (1952a). Science and hypothesis. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poincare, H. (1952b). Science and method. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1980). Science: Conjectures and refutations. In E. D. Klemke, R. Hollinger, & A. D. Kline (Eds.), Introductory readings in the philosophy of science (pp. 19–34). New York: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. (1951). Two dogmas of empiricism. The Philosophical Review, 60(1), 20–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapaport, D. (1951). The conceptual model of psychoanalysis. In M. Gill (Ed.), The collected papers of David Rapaport (pp. 405–431). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1912). The Problems of philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sass, L. A. (1989). Humanism, hermeneutics, and humanistic psychoanalysis: Differing conceptions of subjectivity. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 12(3), 433–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schore, A. N. (1997). A century after Freud’s project: Is a rapprochement between psychoanalysis and neurobiology a hand? Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 45(3), 807–840.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schore, A. N. (2001a). Effects of a secure attachment relationship on right brain development, affect regulation, and infant mental health. Infant Mental Health Journal, 22(1–2), 7–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schore, A. N. (2001b). The effects of early relational trauma on right brain development, affect regulation, and infant mental health. Infant Mental Health Journal, 22(1–2), 201–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwandt, T. A. (1995). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 118–137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwandt, T. A. (2000). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretivism, hermeneutics, and social constructivism. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 189–213). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, M., Shane, E., & Gales, M. (1997). Intimate attachments: Toward a new self psychology. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shevrin, H. (1995). Is psychoanalysis one science, two sciences, or no science at all? A discourse among friendly antagonists. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 43(4), 963–986.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D. J. (1999). The developing mind: Toward a neurobiology of interpersonal experience. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solms, M., & Turnbull, O. (2002). The brain and the inner world: An introduction to the neuroscience of subjective experience. New York: Other Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitz, R. A. (1965). The first year of life: A psychoanalytic study of normal and deviant development of object relations. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spruiell, V. (1993). Deterministic chaos and the sciences of complexity: Psychoanalysis in the midst of a general scientific revolution. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 41(1), 3–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, D. N. (1989). Developmental prerequisites for the sense of narrated self. In A. M. Cooper, O. F. Kernberg, & E. S. Person (Eds.), Psychoanalysis: Toward the second century (pp. 168–178). New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, D. N. (1993). Why study children’s narratives? The Signal: Newletter of the World Association for Infant Mental Health, 1(3), 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolorow, R. D. (1992). Contexts of being: The intersubjective foundations of psychological life. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolorow, R. D., Atwood, G. E., & Brandchaft, B. (Eds.). (1994). The intersubjective perspective. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strenger, C. (1991). Between hermeneutics and science: An essay on the epistemology of psychoanalysis. In Psychological issues (Vol. 59). Madison, CT: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, H. S. (1947). Conceptions of modern psychiatry. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulloway, F. J. (1979). Freud, biologist of the mind: Beyond the psychoanalytic legend. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, E., & Smith, L. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M. G. (2004). Postmodernism and psychoanalysis: A Heideggerian critique of postmodernist malaise and the question of authenticity. In J. Reppen, J. Tucker, & M. A. Schulman (Eds.), Way beyond Freud: Postmodern psychoanalysis observed (pp. 173–202). London: Open Gate Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teicholz, J. G. (1999). Kohut, Loewald, and the Postmoderns: A comparative study of self and relationship. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teicholz, J. G. (2009). A strange convergence: postmodern theory, infant research, and psycho-analysis. In R. Frie & D. Orange (Eds.), Beyond Postmodernism: New dimensions in clinical theory and practice (pp. 69–90). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titchener, E. (1912). The schema of introspection, American Journal of Psychology, 23, 485–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. (1953). The philosophy of science. London: Hutchinson’s University Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. (1986). Self psychology as a “postmodern” science. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 6(3), 459–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tronick, E. Z. (2002). A model of infant mood states and Sandarian affective waves. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 12, 73–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tronick, E. Z. (2007). The neurobehavioral and social-emotional development of infants and children. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language (translated by Alex Kozulin). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Palombo, J., Koch, B.J., Bendicsen, H.K. (2009). Conclusion. In: Guide to Psychoanalytic Developmental Theories. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-88455-4_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics