Abstract
As the Afterword, this chapter considers issues related to how research into the design of learning environments, as discussed in this volume, might inform perspectives on the transformation of learning more generally. Fostering such a transformation will require, as a minimum, attention to assessment methods and teaching practices. Future learning environments, it is argued, should enable formative assessments that provide dynamic feedback about both individual learning and the learning of groups. These environments should also augment the pedagogical palette that teachers have available for enabling new ways of teaching and learning. Although technology-based innovations may be necessary for certain types of future learning environments, they are unlikely to be sufficient, and therefore must be aligned with pedagogical approaches, content, assessments, and societal goals for education. The chapter concludes with a consideration of ways in which “top-down” policy initiatives and “bottom-up” cumulative practices might contribute to large-scale learning transformations of educational systems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Crawford, V. M. & Brophy, S. (2006). Adaptive expertise: Methods, findings, and emerging issues. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
Crawford, V. M., Schlager, M. S., Penuel, W. R., & Toyama, Y. (2008). Supporting the art of teaching in a data-rich, high-performance learning environment. In E. B. Mandinach & M. Honey (Eds.), Data-driven school improvement (pp. 109-129). New York: Teachers College Press.
Dede, C. (2008). A seismic shift in epistemology. EDUCAUSE Review, 43(May/June), 80-81.
Farrell, W. (1998). How hits happen: Forecasting predictability in a chaotic marketplace. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers.
Hickey, D. T., Suiker, S. T., Taasoobshirazi, G., Schafer, N. J., & Michael, M. A. (2006). Balacing varied assessment functions to attain systemic validity: Three is the magic number. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32, 180-201.
Hinds, M. (2002). Teaching as a clinical profession: A new challenge for education. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
Law, N., Pelgrum, W. J., & Plomp, T. (2008). Pedagogy in ICT use (“Sites 2006”). Berlin: Springer.
Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L., Almond, R. G., Haertel, G. D., & Penuel, W. R. (2003). Leverage points for improving educational assessment (PADI technical report 2). Stanford, CA: SRI.
Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (eds). (2001). Knowing what studens know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: Academic Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Reimann, P., Jacobson, M.J. (2010). Afterword: Opportunities for Transformational Learning. In: Jacobson, M., Reimann, P. (eds) Designs for Learning Environments of the Future. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-88279-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-88279-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-88278-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-88279-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)