Conclusion: European Integration and the Elusive European Dream



Sociologists have long pondered the emergence of a European society, overriding if not replacing a Europe of kindred and related national societies. This handbook adds a great amount of knowledge to the issue, while providing well-grounded arguments for further debate. The European Union partly based on and following historical patterns has greatly facilitated growing interdependencies and interactions between Europeans and European societies. Yet social integration does not simply follow structural integration. From the history of European nation-building we know that it is not necessarily just a question of time and time lag. This divergence subverts institution building efforts at the European level.


European Society Welfare State European Integration Family Patter Economic Liberalization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Alber, Jens; Fahey, Tony and Saraceno, Chiara (eds.), 2008: Handbook of Quality of Life in the Enlarged European Union. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Bartolini, Stefano, 2005: Restructuring Europe: Centre Formation, System Building and Political Structuring Between the Nation-State and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barzini, Luigi, 1983: The Europeans. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, Ulrich and Sznaider, Natan, 2006: A literature on cosmopolitanism: an overview. British Journal of Sociology 57, 1: 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brooks, Clem and Manza, Jeff, 2006: Why Welfare-States Persist: The Importance of Public Opinion in Democracies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Caramani, Daniele, 2004: The Nationalization of Politics: The Formation of National Electorates and Party Systems in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crouch, Colin, 2008: Change in European Societies since the 1970s. West European Politics 31: 14–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Delhey, Jan and Kohler, Ulrich, 2006: From Nationally Bounded to Pan-European Inequalities? On the Importance of Foreign Countries as Reference Groups. European Sociological Review 22, 2: 125–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Delhey, Jan, 2007. Grenzüberschreitender Austausch und Vertrauen. Ein Test der Transkationsthese für Europa. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, Sonderheft 47, 141–162.Google Scholar
  10. De Madariaga, Salvador, 1951: Bosque De Europe. Mexico: Editioral Hermes.Google Scholar
  11. Fligstein, Neil, 2008: Euroclash: the EU, European identity, and the future of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Flora, Peter, 2000: Externe Grenzbildung und interne Strukturierung - Europa und seine Nationen. Eine Rokkan’sche Forschungsperspektive. Berliner Journal für Soziologie 10, 2: 151–165.Google Scholar
  13. Garhammer, Manfred, 1999: Wie Europäer ihre Zeit nutzen. Zeitstrukturen und Zeitkulturen im Zeichen der Globalisierung. Berlin: Sigma.Google Scholar
  14. Haller, Max, 2008: European Integration as an Elite Process. The Failure of a Dream? New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Haller, Max, 2009: Identität und Grenzen Europas. To appear in: Annali di Sociologia 17.Google Scholar
  16. Hedetoft, Ulf, 1998: Constructions of Europe. Territoriality, Sovereignty, Identity: Disaggregations of Cultural and Political Space. In: S. Immerfall (ed): Territoriality in the Globalizing Society: One Place or None? New York: Springer, pp. 153–173.Google Scholar
  17. Heidar, Knut, 2003: Parties and Cleavages in the European Political Space. University of Oslo: ARENA Working Paper Series 07/2003.Google Scholar
  18. Hettlage, Robert and Müller, Hans-Peter (eds.), 2006: Die europäische Gesellschaft. Konstanz: UVK.Google Scholar
  19. Jordan-Bychkov, Terry G. and Bychkova Jordan, Bella, 2004: The European Culture Area: A Systematic Geography. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Kaelble, Harmut, 2007: Sozialgeschichte Europas. 1945 bis zur Gegenwart. München: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
  21. Kaelble, Harmut; Kirsch, Martin and Schmidt-Gernig, Alexander, 2002: Transnationale Öffentlichkeiten und Identitäten im 20. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.Google Scholar
  22. Martinelli, Alberto (eds.), 2007: Transatlantic Divide. Comparing American and European Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Mau, Steffen, 2007: Transnationale Vergesellschaftung. Die Entgrenzung sozialer Lebenswelten. Frankfurt a. M., New York: Campus.Google Scholar
  24. Morin, Edgar, 1990: Penser l’Europe. (Ed. rev., orig. 1987) Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  25. Münch, Richard, 2008: Die Konstruktion der europäischen Gesellschaft. Zur Dialektik von transnationaler Integration und nationaler Desintegration. Frankfurt/M.: Campus.Google Scholar
  26. Outhwaite, William, 2008: European Society. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  27. Rokkan, Stein, 2000: Staat, Nation und Demokratie in Europa. Die Theorie Stein Rokkans aus seinen gesammelten Werken rekonstruiert und eingeleitet von Peter Flora. Übersetzt von Elisabeth Fix. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  28. Therborn, Göran, 2000a: Die Gesellschaften Europas 1945–2000. Ein soziologischer Vergleich (updated edition from European Modernity and Beyond. The Trajectory of European Societies, 1945–2000. London: Sage.). Frankfurt/M. Campus.Google Scholar
  29. Therborn, Göran, 2000b: Globalizations: Dimensions, Historical Waves, Regional Effects, Normative Governance. International Sociology 15, 2: 151–170.Google Scholar
  30. Therborn, Göran, 2002: The World’s Trader, the World’s Lawyer: Europe and Global Processes, European Journal of Social Theory 5, 4: 403–417.Google Scholar
  31. Therborn, Göran, 2004: Between Sex and Power: Family in the World, 1900–2000: Family in the World 1900–2000. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Humanities DepartmentUniversity of Education at Schwäbisch GmündSchwäbisch GmündGermany
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations