Advertisement

Sexuality and Family Formation

  • Elina Haavio-Mannila
  • Anna Rotkirch
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, we compare key areas affecting sexuality and family formation in six European regions. We have attempted to retain internal divisions especially in Eastern Europe, which are often overlooked. Nevertheless, our results point to the continuing relevance of the East−West division. We compare different indicators in the Nordic, Western, Eastern Central European, and Eastern Mediterranean European countries as well as the former Soviet Union countries. The data were collected from international statistics and comparative surveys conducted in the early 21st century. While many countries are showing signs of converging development, Europe is still divided by the classic, “vertical” Trieste-Petersburg line. Early entry into parenthood and quasi-universal marriage rates are more common East of this line, while later entry into parenthood but also fertility rates characterise the Western part. Additionally, three horizontal “belts” of family formations emphasise gender equality in the North, individual autonomy in Central Europe, and traditional family values in the South. There are crucial tensions between each of these three concepts: freedom, tradition, and gender equality. Complete sexual freedom may be opposed to gender equality, while great marital and reproductive choice does not always lead to stable and traditional families.

Keywords

Gender Equality Nordic Country Marriage Rate Maternal Employment Sexual Initiation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anttonen Anneli & Jorma Sipilä (2005) ‘Comparative approaches to social care: Diversity in care production modes’, in Birgit Pfau-Effinger & Birgit Geissler (eds) Care and Social Integration in European Societies, Bristol: The Policy Press, pp. 115–134.Google Scholar
  2. Arber, Sara & Claudine Attias-Donfut (eds) (1999) The Myth of Generational Conflict. The Family and State in Ageing Societies. London: Routledge/ESA Studies in European Societies.Google Scholar
  3. Attias-Donfut, Claudine (2000) ‘Rapports de générations. Transferts intrafamiliaux macrosocial’. Revue Francaise de Sociologie 41, 643-684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Attias-Donfut, Claudine & Alain Rozenkier (eds) (1997) Les Solidarités Entre Générations. Vieillesse, Familles, État. Nathan.Google Scholar
  5. Bajos, Nathalie & Agnés Guillaume (2003) ‘Contraceptive practices and use of abortion among adolescents and young adults in Europe’, in Bajos, Nathalie & Agnés Guillaume (eds) Reproductive Health Behaviour of Young Europeans, Vol. 1. Directorate General III − Social Cohesion, Council of Europe Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Billari, F.C., A.C. Liefbroer & D. Philipov (2006) The Postponement of Childbearing in Europe: Driving Forces and Implications. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2006, pp. 1–18. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  7. Bjornberg, Ulla (2007) Family ties between generations − Transfers of material and social support among individuals in different family forms. http://www.sociology.gu.se/
  8. Björnberg, Ulla & Guðný Björk Eydal (1995). ‘Family obligations in Sweden’,iIn Jane Millar & Andrea Warman (eds), Defining Family Obligations in Europe, pp. 359–378. Bath: University of Bath.Google Scholar
  9. Börsch-Supan, Axel, Agar Brugiavini, Hendrik Jürges, Johan Mackenbach, Johannes Siegrist & Guglielmo Weber (2005), Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe − First Results from SHARE, Mannheim: MEA.Google Scholar
  10. Bozon, Michel (2003) ‘At what age do women and men have their first sexual intercourse? World comparisons and recent trends’, Population & Societies 391, 1–4.Google Scholar
  11. Bozon, Michel & Osmo Kontula (1998) ‘Sexual initiation and gender in Europe: A cross-cultural analysis of trends in the twentieth century’, in Michel Hubert, Nathalie Bajos & Theo Sandfort (eds), Sexual Behaviour and HIV/AIDS in Europe. Comparisons of National Surveys, London: University College London (UCL) Press.Google Scholar
  12. Drobnic, Sonja & Judith Treas (2006) ‘Household arrangements under welfare state regimes: Employment and the division of household labor in USA, Germany, and Finland’. Paper presented at the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, August 11–14.Google Scholar
  13. Duncan, Simon & Rosalind Edwards (1999) Lone Mothers, Paid Work and Gendered Moral Rationalities, London: MacMillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duncan, Simon & Rosalind Edwards (2003) ‘State welfare regimes, mothers’ agencies and gendered moral rationalities’, in Anna-Karin Kollind & Abby Peterson (eds) Thoughts on Family, Gender, Generation and Class. A Festchrift to Ulla Björnberg. Research Report 133 from the Department of Sociology, Göteborg University.Google Scholar
  15. Durex Global Sex Survey (2005) http://www.durex.com
  16. Esping-Andersen, Gösta (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  17. European Union (2002) Social Trends 34.Google Scholar
  18. European and World Values Surveys Four-wave Integrated Data File, 1981−2004. http://www.icprs.umich.edu/cocoon/ICPSR/STUDY/04531.xml
  19. Eurostat (2007) Harmonised European Time Use Survey. http://www.testh2.scb.se/tus/tus/Table_0 M.html. Extension of publication How Europeans spend their time. Everyday life of women and men. Data 1998–2002 (2004), Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  20. Eurostat, Census (2001) Households and Families.Google Scholar
  21. EQLS (2007) European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions: First European Quality of Life Survey: Time Use and Work-Life Options over the Life Course, Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. http://epp.eurostat.cec.eu.int.
  22. Fuwa, Makiko (2004) Macro-Level Gender Inequality and the Division of Household Labour in 22 Countries, American Sociological Review 69 (9), 751–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fuwa, Makiko & Philp N. Cohen (2007) Housework and social policy. Social Science Research, 36 (2), 512–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Geist, Claudia (2005) ‘The welfare state and the home: Regime differences in the domestic division of labour’, European Sociological Review 21, 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. GENTRANS (2006–2009) Research Project financed by The Academy of Finland: Baby Boomers’ Generational Transmissions in Finland,http://blogs.helsinki.fi/gentrans
  26. Giele, Janet Zollinger (1997) ‘Women’s changing lives and the emergence of family policy’, in Kaisa Kauppinen & Tuula Gordon (eds) Unsolved Dilemmas – Women, Work and the Family in the United States, Europe and the Former Soviet Union. Aldershot: Ashgate, 153–168.Google Scholar
  27. Goode, William J. (1963) World Revolution and Family Patterns, London: The Free Press of Glencow.Google Scholar
  28. Gronow, Jukka et al. (eds) (1996) Cultural Inertia and Social Change in Russia. Distributions by Gender and Age Group. Report of a research project at the Department of Sociology, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
  29. Haavio-Mannila, Elina & Osmo Kontula (2003) Sexual Trends in the Baltic Sea Area, Helsinki: The Population Research Institute, The Family Federation of Finland.Google Scholar
  30. Haavio-Mannila, Elina, Osmo Kontula & Anna Rotkirch (2002) Sexual Lifestyles in the Twentieth Century. A Research Study. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  31. Haavio-Mannila, Elina & J.P. Roos (2007) Why are men reporting more sexual partners than women? In Kathleen B. Jones & Gunnel Karlsson (eds) Gender and the Interests of Love. Festschrift for Anna Jonasdottir, Örebro: Gender Studies at Örebro University.Google Scholar
  32. Haavio-Mannila, Elina & Anna Rotkirch (1997) ‘Generational and gender differences in sexual life in St. Petersburg and urban Finland’, Yearbook of Population Research in Finland XXXIV. The Population Research Institute, The Family Federation in Finland, pp. 133–160.Google Scholar
  33. Hajnal, John (1965) ‘European marriage patterns in perspective’, in D. V. Glass & D. E. C. Eversley (eds) Population in History, Essays in Historical Demography, 101–143. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  34. Hill, Sarah E & H. Kern Reeve (2004) ‘Mating games: the evolution of human mating transactions’, Behavioral Ecology 15, 748–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hill, Sarah E. & H. Kern Reeve (2005) ‘Low fertility in humans as the evolutionary outcome of snowballing resource games’. Behavioral Ecology 16: 398–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jallinoja, Riitta (1989) ‘Women between the Family and employment’, in Boh, Katja, Maren Bak, Cristine Clason, Maja Pankratova, Jens Qvortrop, Giovanni B. Sgritta & Kari Waerness (eds) (1989) Changing Patterns of European Family life, A Comparative Analysis of 14 European Countries, pp. 95–122. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Jallinoja, Riitta (1995) ‘Centrality and peripherality upside down? Gender equality and the family in Western Europe’, Historical Social Research 20 (2), 244–265.Google Scholar
  38. Kesseli, Katja (2007)‘First birth in Russia: Everyone does it – young’, Finnish Yearbook of Population Research XLII, 41–62. Helsinki: The Population Research Institute.Google Scholar
  39. Kesseli, Katja et al. (2005) ‘Reproductive health and fertility in St. Petersburg: Report on a survey of 18–44 year old women in 2004’, Department of Sociology, University of Helsinki, Working Papers 60.Google Scholar
  40. Kohli, Martin (1999) ‘Private and public transfers between generations: Linking the family and the state’. European Societies 1, 81–104.Google Scholar
  41. Kontula, Osmo & Elina Haavio-Mannila (1995) Sexual Pleasures – Enhancement of Sex Life in Finland, 1971–1992. Aldershot: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
  42. Leridon, Henri, Gerrtjan van Zessen & Michel Hubert (1998) ‘The Europeans and their sexual partners’, in Michel Hubert, Nathalie Bajos &Theo Sandfort (eds) Sexual Behaviour and HIV/AIDS in Europe, University College London (UCL) Press.Google Scholar
  43. Lewis, Jane (1992) Gender and the Development of Welfare Regimes. Journal of European Social Policy 2 (3), 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mace, Ruth (1998) ‘The coevolution of human fertility and wealth inheritance strategies’. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 353: 389–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mahon, Rianne (2002) ‘Child care: Toward what kind of “Social Europe”’. Social Politics Fall, 343–379.Google Scholar
  46. Malin, Maili & Mika Gissler (2007) ‘Induced abortions among women of migrant origin in Finland’. Abstract book for the 18th Meeting in Social Medicine and Public Health, 31. Helsinki: STAKES Discussion Papers 5/2007.Google Scholar
  47. Millar, Jane & Andrea Warman (1996) Family Obligations in Europe: The Family, the State and Social Policy. Policy Press: Bristol.Google Scholar
  48. Millar, Jane & Martin Evans (eds) (2003) Lone Parents and Employment: International Comparison of What Works. http://opensingle.inist.fr/handle/10068/41437
  49. Niemi, Iiris & Hannu Pääkkönen (2002) Time Use Changes in Finland Through the 1990s. Helsinki: Statistics Finland.Google Scholar
  50. Orloff, Ann Shola (1993) ‘Gender and the social rights of citizenship: The comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare states’. American Sociological Review 58: 303–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. REFER (2004) Reproductive health and fertility patterns − A comparative approach. REFER group is a research consortium conducting this project in Finland, Estonia and St. Petersburg. http://www.valt.helsinki.fi/staff/rotkirch/
  52. Ronsen, Marit & Kari Skrede (2006) Nordic fertility patterns: Compatible with gender equality, in Ellingsaeter, Anne Lise & Arnlaug Leira (eds) Politicising Parenthood in Scandinavia. Gender Relations in Welfare States, Bristol: The Policy Press, pp. 53–76.Google Scholar
  53. Rotkirch, Anna (2000) The man question. Loves and lives in late 20th century Russia’. University of Helsinki, Department of Social Policy, Research Reports 1.Google Scholar
  54. Rotkirch, Anna & Katja Kesseli (2008) Chislo detej i ih mesto v zhiznennoi tsikle (Timing and number of children in St Petersburg). In E. Zdravomyslova et al. (eds) Novyj byt. St Petersburg: European University of St Petersburg.Google Scholar
  55. Sánchez-Barricarte, Jesús J. & Remo Fernández-Carro (2007) Patterns in the delay and recovery of fertility in Europe.European Journal of Population 23, 145–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sanderson, Stephen K. & Joshua Dubrow (2000) ‘Fertility decline in the modern world and in the original demographic transition. Testing three theories with cross-national data’, Population and Environment (21), 511–537.Google Scholar
  57. Santow, Gigi & Michael Bracher (2001) Deferment of the first birth and fluctuating fertility in sweden. European Journal of Population 17, 344–363Google Scholar
  58. Schmitt, David P. (2005) Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28, 247–311Google Scholar
  59. SHARE – Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (2004-). http://www.share-project.org. This paper uses data from SHARE release 2.2.0, as of August 19th 2009. SHARE data collection in 2004–2007 was primarily funded by the European Commission through its 5th and 6th framework programmes (project numbers QLK6-CT-2001- 00360; RII-CT- 2006-062193; CIT5-CT-2005-028857). Additional funding by the US National Institute on Aging (grant numbers U01 AG09740-13S2; P01 AG005842; P01 AG08291; P30 AG12815; Y1-AG-4553-01; OGHA 04-064; R21 AG025169) as well as by various national sources is gratefully acknowledged (see http://www.share-project.org for a full list of funding institutions).
  60. Szalai, Alexander (ed) (1972) The Use of Time: Daily Activities of Urban and Suburban Populations in Twelve Countries. The Hague/Berlin: Mouton/Walter de Gruyter Inc.Google Scholar
  61. Temkina, Anna (2008) Sexualnaia zhizn zhenshchiny: mezhdu podchineniem i svobodoi (The sexual life of women: between subordination and liberation), St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Therborn, Göran (2004) Between Sex and Power. Family in the World, 1900–2000, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  63. Therborn, Göran (2007) World Family Systems. Informal Power Point presentation.Google Scholar
  64. Titmuss, Richard (1974) Social Policy, London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  65. Tumin, Melvin (1974) Sosiaalinen kerrostuneisuus (Social Stratification), Gummerus, Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
  66. UNECE The Statistical Yearbook of the Economic Commission for Europe.Google Scholar
  67. United Nations Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2006)World Marriage Patterns 2000.Google Scholar
  68. United Nations Statistics Division, Demographic and Social Statistics (2006) Statistics and Indicators on Women and Men.Google Scholar
  69. United Nations Statistics Division, Demographic and Social Statistics (2006) Social Indicators.Google Scholar
  70. Vishnevskij, Anatolij et al. (2006) Demograficheskaia modernizatsiia Rossii: 1900–2000. Moscow: Novoe izdatelstvo.Google Scholar
  71. Walker, Allan (1996) ‘Intergenerational relations and the provision of welfare’ in Allan Walker (ed.)The New Generational Contract. Intergenerational Relations, Old Age and Welfare, University College London (UCL) Press.Google Scholar
  72. Westermarck, Edward (1970/1936) The Future of Marriage in Western Civilisation. Freeport, New York: Books For Libraries Press.Google Scholar
  73. Westoff, Charles F. & Thomas Frejka (2007) Religiousness and fertility among European Muslims. Population and Development Review 33 (4), 785–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. WHO Regional Office for Europe (2007).Google Scholar
  75. World Values Surveys http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.The Family Federation of FinlandThe Population Research InstituteHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations