Stellar Populations in Field Early–Type Galaxies

  • F. Annibali
  • A. Bressan
  • R. Rampazzo
  • P. Panuzzo
  • W. Zeilinger
  • L. Danese
Conference paper
Part of the Astrophysics and Space Science Proceedings book series (ASSSP)


With the aim of understanding the role played by mass and environment on the evolution of early-type galaxies (ETGs), we are performing a multi-band study from ultraviolet (UV) to infrared (IR) of a sample 65 nearby ETGs. We derived Lick line-strength indices at different galacto-centric distances from the optical spectra (3700-7000 Å), and extracted ages, metallicites and element abundance ratios for the galaxies by comparison of the indices with new Simple Stellar Population (SSP) models. We then analyzed the behavior of the derived stellar population parameters with the central galaxy velocity dispersion and the local galaxy density. We find that the chemical path is mainly driven by the halo mass, more massive galaxies exhibiting the more efficient chemical enrichment and shorter star formation timescales. Galaxies in denser environments are on average older than galaxies in less dense environments. In particular, luminosity-weighted ages as young as few Gyrs are derived for some galaxies of the sample in the lowest density environments. We suggest that these objects are old galaxies that experienced secondary “rejuvenating” episodes of star formation. We discuss how we will constrain the mass involved in the rejuvenating episodes by complementing the optical spectra with new GALEX and Spitzer data.


Star Formation Stellar Population Asymptotic Giant Branch Star Formation History Type Galaxy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Annibali, F., Bressan, A., Rampazzo, R., & Zeilinger, W. 2006, A&A, 445, 79CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. Annibali, F., Bressan, A., Rampazzo, R., Zeilinger, W. W., & Danese, L. 2007, A&A, 463, 455CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. Bower, R. G., Lucey, J. R., & Ellis, R. S. 1992, MNRAS, 254, 601ADSGoogle Scholar
  4. Bressan, A., et al. 2006, ApJL, 639, L55CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. di Serego Alighieri, S., Bressan, A., & Pozzetti, L. 2006, in ‘‘From Stars to Galaxies: Building the Pieces to Build Up the Universe’’, ASP Conference Series, Vol. 374 pp. 449Google Scholar
  6. González, J. J. 1993, Ph.D. thesis, Univ. California, Santa CruzGoogle Scholar
  7. Panuzzo, P., et al. 2007, ApJ, 656, 206CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. Rampazzo, R., Annibali, F., Bressan, A., Longhetti, M., Padoan, F., & Zeilinger, W. W. 2005, A&A, 433, 497CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. Renzini, A., & Ciotti, L. 1993, ApJL, 416, L49CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. Roberts, M., Hogg, D., Bregman, J., Forman, W., & Jones, C. 1991, ApJS 75, 751CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. Sandage, A. R., & Tammann, G. 1987, A Revised Shapley Ames Catalogue of Bright Galaxies, Carnegie, Washington (RSA)Google Scholar
  12. Sarzi, M., Falcón-Barroso, J., Davies, R. L., Bacon, R., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 366, 1151ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. Stanford, S. A., Eisenhardt, P. R., & Dickinson, M. 1998, ApJ, 492, 461CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. Trager, S. C., Worthey, G., Faber, S. M., Burstein, D., & Gonzalez J. J. 1998, ApJS, 116, 1CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. van Dokkum, P. G., & van der Marel, R. P. 2007, ApJ, 655, 30CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. Worthey, G., & Ottaviani, D. L. 1997, ApJS 111, 377CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Annibali
    • 1
  • A. Bressan
    • 2
  • R. Rampazzo
    • 2
  • P. Panuzzo
    • 2
    • 5
  • W. Zeilinger
    • 3
  • L. Danese
    • 4
  1. 1.BaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.INAF-OAPDItaly
  3. 3.Institut für Astronomie der Universität WienAustria
  4. 4.SISSAItaly
  5. 5.Laboratoire AIM CEA/DSM - CNRS - Universite Paris DiderotDAPNIA/Service d’AstrophysiqueCEA-SaclayFrance

Personalised recommendations