Assessment of Pain: Complete Patient Evaluation

  • Amitabh Gulati
  • Jeffrey Loh


Throughout history, physicians believed that the perception of pain could be explained by a single, simplified physiologic pathway (Loeser et al. 2001a). Their theories described pain as its own sensory apparatus, independent of touch and other senses, or as a result of excessive stimulation from the touch sensation. While the exact mechanisms were unknown, most physicians agreed that pain required a triggering stimulus and that removal of the stimulus should relieve pain. More recently, practitioners focus on pain that occurs during the absence of tissue damage or other organic pathology. While most pain experienced may have an initial inciting event, continuation of pain after removal of the stimulus indicates that many factors and biological pathways interact to cause the sensation of pain. Hence, the initial assessment of an individual’s pain is important in determining the underlying cause and the possible treatments available for that individual (Loeser et al. 2001b, c; Garratt et al. 1993).


Herpes Zoster Numerical Rating Scale Lyme Disease Oswestry Disability Index Complex Regional Pain Syndrome 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bair MJ, Robinson RL, Katon W, Kroenke K. Depression and pain comorbidity: a literature review. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(20):2433–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Garratt AM, Ruta DA, Abdalla MI, et al. The SF36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS? BMJ. 1993;306(6890):1440–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Harden R, Bruehl S. Diagnosis of complex regional pain syndrome: signs, symptoms, and new empirically derived diagnostic criteria. Clin J Pain. 2006;22(5):415–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hudson JI, Hudson MS, Pliner LF, et al. Fibromyalgia and major affective disorder: a controlled phenomenology and family history study. Am J Psychiatry. 1985;142(4):441–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Jamison RN, Virts KL. The influence of family support on chronic pain. Behav Res Ther. 1990;28(4):118–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Loeser J, Butler S, et al. History of pain concepts and therapies. Bonica’s management of pain. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001a. pp. 7–11.Google Scholar
  7. Loeser J, Butler S, et al. Medical evaluation of the patient with pain. Bonica’s management of pain. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001b, pp. 276–78.Google Scholar
  8. Loeser J, Butler S, et al. Medical evaluation of the patient with pain. Bonica’s management of pain. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001c, p. 270.Google Scholar
  9. Magni G, Schifano F, De Leo D. Pain as a symptom in elderly depressed patients: relationship to diagnostic subgroups. Eur Arch Psychiatr Neurol Sci. 1985;235(3):143–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Overcash J, Extermann M, Parr J, et al. Validity and reliability of the FACT-G scale for use in the older person with cancer. Am J Clin Oncol (CCT). 2001;24(6):591–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Schaffer CB, Donlon PT, Bittle RM. Chronic pain and depression: a clinical and family history survey. Am J Psychiatry. 1980;137(1):118–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Shea JK, Gioffre R, Carrion H, Small MP. Autonomic hyperreflexia in spinal cord injury. South Med J. 1973;66(8):869–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Tesfaye S, Malik R, Ward JD. Vascular factors in diabetic neuropathy. Diabetologia 1994;37(9):847–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Waldman S. Radiography. Pain Management. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2006a:74–84.Google Scholar
  15. Waldman S. Computed Tomography. Pain Management. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2006b:93–106.Google Scholar
  16. Waldman S. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Pain Management. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2006c:106–117.Google Scholar
  17. Wittink H, Turk DC, Carr DB, et al. Comparison of the redundancy, reliability, and responsiveness to change among SF-36, Oswestry disability index, and multidimensional pain inventory. Clin J Pain. 2004;20(3):133–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amitabh Gulati
    • 1
  • Jeffrey Loh
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of AnesthesiologyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of AnesthesiologyWeill Cornell College of MedicineNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations