A series of home visits with a group of Brazilian immigrant families of three and four year olds refutes the premise that financially disadvantaged immigrant children do not receive support for their learning at home. Parents and other family members participate in developing their children's literacy skills, and were observed engaging in a variety of communicative practice, such as singing, drawing, or dramatic play. In this qualitative study approximately 60 home visits were conducted to observe the focal children in their daily home environments. Observed communicative events were coded for type of modality, such as dramatic play, singing, drawing, video, photographs, and art. Data derived from observations of multimodal literacy events revealed that the greatest frequency of such literacy events occurred in dramatic play. In addition, themes identifying the purpose of the multimodal literacy events, often related to relationship building between parent and child, as well as themes related to maintaining relationships and connections to the homeland. Implications for practitioners involve recognizing the numerous multimodal literacy experiences children experience at home before formal schooling, as well as the need for sensitivity on the part of teachers regarding the importance of extended family relationships and connections to the homeland.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anning, A. (2003). Pathways to the graphicacy club: The crossroad of home and pre-school.Journal of Early Childhood Literacy3(1), 5–35
Archer, A. (2006). A multimodal approach to academc ‘literacies’: Problemitising the visual/verbal divide.Language and Education2(6), 449–462
Barton, D. (1998).Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers Ltd
Bateson, M. C. (1984).With a daughter 's eye. (1sted.). New York: William Morrow & Company, Inc
Bissex, G. (1980).GNYS AT WRK: A child learns to read. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Butler, D., & Clay, M. (1987).Reading begins at home. (2nded.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinnemann Educational Books, Inc
Chall, J., & Snow, C. (1982).Families and literacy: The contribution of out-of-school experiences to children 's acquisition of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Dickinson, D. (Ed.). (1994).Bridges to literacy: Children, families, and schools. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell
Dyson, A. H. (1993). The social worlds of children learning to read and write in an urban primary school. New York: Teachers College Press
Freire, P. (1998).Teachers as cultural workers. (D. Macedo, D. Koike, & A. Oliveira, Trans.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press
Grillo, R. (1989). Anthropology, language, politics. In Grillo, R. (Ed.), Social anthropology and the politics of language (pp. 1–24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Hamilton, M. (2000). Expanding the new literacy studies: Using photographs to explore literacy as a social practice. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton, & R. Ivanic (Eds.)Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context(pp. 16–34). London: Routledge
Heath, S. (1983).Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press
Johnson, D. (2003). Activity, theory, mediated action and literacy: Assessing how children make meaning in multiple modes.Assessment in Education10(1), 103–129
Kress, G. (1997).Before writing: Rethinking the paths to literacy. London: Routledge
Kress, G. (2000). Multimodality: Challenges to thinking about language.TESOL Quarterly34(2), 337 – 340
Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J., & Tsatsarelis, C. (2001).Multimodal teaching and learning: The rhetorics of the science classroom. London: Continuum
Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001).Multimodal discourse. London: Edward Arnold
Larrick, N. (1982).A parent 's guide to children 's reading. Philadelphia, PA: Westminster
Merriam, S. (1988).Case study research in education: A qualitative approach(1sted.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994).Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. (2nded.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
Morrow, L. (1993).Literacy development in the early years: Helping children read and write. (2nded.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon
Purcell-Gates, V. (1996). Stories, coupons and the TV guide: Relationships between home literacy experiences and emergent literacy knowledge.Reading Research Quarterly31(4), 406– 428
Rogoff, B. (1997). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. Wertsch, P. Del Rio & A. Alvarez (Eds.)Sociocultural studies of mind(pp. 139–164). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. (1981). The literate two-year-old: The fictionalization of self. In R. Scollon & B. Scollon (Eds.)Narrative, literacy, and face in interethnic communication(pp. 57–98). Norwood, NJ: Ablex
Seidman, I. (1991). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: Teachers College Press
Siegal, M. (2006). Rereading the signs: Multimodal transformations in the field of literacy education.Language Arts84(1), 65–77
Stein, P. (2000). Rethinking resources: Multimodal pedagogies in the ESL classroom.TESOL Quarterly34(2), 333–336
Stein, P. (2004). Representation, rights and resources: Multimodal pedagogies in the language and literacy classroom. In K. Toohey & B. Norton (Eds.)Critical Pedagogies and Language Learning(pp. 95–115). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Stenglin, M., & Idema, R. (2001). How to analyse visual images: A guide for TESOL teachers. In A. Burns & C. Coffin (Eds.)Analysing English in global context(pp. 194–208). London: Routledge
Street, B. (1987). Literacy and social change: The significance of social context in the development of literacy programs. In D. Wagner (Ed.)The future of literacy(pp. 55–72). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press
Street, B. (1997). The new literacy studies. In B. Street (Ed.)Cross-cultural approaches to literacy(pp. 1–21). New York: Cambridge University Press
Szwed, J. (1981). The ethnography of literacy. In M. Whiteman (Ed.)Variation in writing: Functional and linguistic-cultural differences(pp. 13–23). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Taylor, D. (1983).Family literacy: Young children learning to read and write. Exeter, NH: Heinemann
Taylor, D., & Dorsey-Gaines, C. (1988).Growing up literate: Learning from inner-city families. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
Teale, W. (1986). Home background and young children 's literacy development. In W. Teale & E. Sulzby (Eds.)Emergent literacy: Writing and reading(pp. 173–206). Norwood, NJ: Ablex
Walsh, M. (2006). The ‘textual shift’: Examining the reading process with print, visual and multimodal texts.Australian Journal of Language and Literacy29(1), 24–37
Wertsch, J. V. (1991).Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Switzer, S.C. (2009). Multiple Modes of Communication of Young Brazilian Children: Singing, Drawing, and English Language Learning. In: Narey, M. (eds) Making Meaning. Educating the Young Child, vol 2. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-87539-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-87539-2_8
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-87537-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-87539-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)