• Marilyn J. Narey
Part of the Educating the Young Child book series (EDYC, volume 2)

This brief exchange took place in an urban school classroom in the northeastern United States. To many early childhood educators across the globe, this story is all too familiar. The current push for educational accountability and reform has only reinforced what Eisner (2006) calls the “production vision of education” (p. 3), wherein schools are expected to work with assembly-line efficiency to achieve a prescribed set of outcomes. Although most education professionals would contest the view that our work with young children is only “important for the test,” we have yet to articulate an alternative vision to guide our collaborative efforts. Secure in the assumption that it is important to promote young children's language, literacy, and learning, we do not typically step back to examine why this work is important; instead, we jump ahead to search for methods and techniques that align with the most recent mandate. As Eisner points out, “We often pursue aims and engage in practices that have become a deep part of our sub-consciousness without ever making them conscious” (p. 4). To make sense of the current state of our field and envision its future development, we must delve into the sea of meaning underlying our everyday work in classrooms, administrative offices, and universities. In other words, we must consider what we mean when we talk about “language,” “literacy,” and “learning.” This requires that we reflect on the varieties and uses of language, interrogate what it means to be literate, and develop our own understanding of why learning is of value to the child and to the society as a whole.


Early Childhood Education English Language Learner Early Childhood Teacher Early Childhood Classroom Early Childhood Curriculum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. de Saint Exupéry, A. (1943/1971).The little prince. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, IncGoogle Scholar
  2. Dewey, J. (1934/1980).Art as experience. New York: PerigeeGoogle Scholar
  3. Dyson, A. H. (1993).Social worlds of children learning to write in an urban primary school. New York: Teachers College PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Dyson, A. H. (2003).The brothers and sisters learn to write: Popular literacies in childhood and school culturesM. New York: Teachers College PressGoogle Scholar
  5. Dyson, A. H. (2004). Diversity as a “handful”: Toward retheorizing the basics.Research in the Teaching of English 39(2), 210–214Google Scholar
  6. Edwards, C. P., Gandini, L. & Forman, G. E. (Eds.) (1998).The Hundred Languages of Children: The Reggio Emilia Approach — Advanced Reflections(2nd ed.). Greenwich, CT: AblexGoogle Scholar
  7. Eisner, E. W. (1978). Reading and the creation of meaning. In E. W Eisner (Ed.)Reading, the arts, and the creation of meaning(pp. 13–31). Reston, VA: National Art Education AssociationGoogle Scholar
  8. Eisner, E. W. (1994).Cognition and curriculum reconsidered(2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College PressGoogle Scholar
  9. Eisner, E. W. (2002).The arts and the creation of mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
  10. Eisner, E. W. (2006).Two visions of education. (The Arts Education Collaborative Monograph No. 2). Pittsburgh, PA: Arts Education CollaborativeGoogle Scholar
  11. Gallas, K. (1994).The languages of learning: How children talk, write, dance, and sing their understanding of the world. New York: Teachers College PressGoogle Scholar
  12. Harste, J. C. (2000). Six points of departure. In B. Berghoff, K. A. Eawa, J. C. Harste, & B. T. Hoonan (Eds.)Beyond reading and writing: Inquiry, curriculum, and multiple ways of knowing(pp. 1–16). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of EnglishGoogle Scholar
  13. Heath, S. B., & Wolf, S. A. (2005). Focus in creative learning: Drawing on art for language development.Literacy 39(1), 38–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kress, G. R. (1997).Before writing: Rethinking the paths to literacy. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Kress, G. R. (2003).Literacy in the new media age. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Maluguzzi, L. (1998). No way. The hundredisthere. In C. Edwards, L. Gandini, & G. Forman (Eds.)The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach—advanced reflections(pp. 2–3). Greenwich, CT: AblexGoogle Scholar
  17. Millard, E., & Marsh, J. (2001). Words with pictures: The role of visual literacy in writing and its implication for schoolingReading 35(2), 54—61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. National Council of Teachers of English. (2005). Multimodal literacies. Retrieved March 2, 2008 from
  19. Olson, J. L. (1992).Envisioning writing: Toward an integration of drawing and writing. Portsmouth, NH: HeinemannGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marilyn J. Narey

    There are no affiliations available

    Personalised recommendations