Abstract
This paper will propose and explore a method to enhance focal actors’ abilities to enroll and control the many social and technical components interacting during the initiation, production, and diffusion of innovations. The reassembling and stabilizing of such components is the challenging goal of the focal actors involved in these processes. To address this possibility, a healthcare project involving the initiation, production, and diffusion of an IT-based innovation will be influenced by the researcher, using concepts from actor network theory (ANT), within an action research methodology (ARM). The experiences using this method, and the nature of enrolment and translation during its use, will highlight if and how ANT can provide a problem-solving method to help assemble the social and technical actants involved in the diffusion of an innovation. Finally, the paper will discuss the challenges and benefits of implementing such methods to attain widespread diffusion.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brown, D. 1997. Innovation Management Tools: A Review of Selected Methodologies, Luxembourg: European Commission.
Chiasson, M., Germonprez, M., and Mathiassen, L. Forthcoming. “Pluralist Action Research: A Review of the Information Systems Literature,” Information Systems Journal.
Chiesa, V., Coughlan, P., and Voss, C. A. 1996. “Development of a Technical Innovation Audit,” Journal of Product Innovation Management (13:2), pp. 105–136.
Cordelia, A., and Shaikh, M. 2006. “From Epistemology to Ontology: Challenging the Constructed ‘Truth’ of ANT,” working paper, Department of Information Systems, London School of Economics.
Hidalgo, A., and Albors J. 2008. “Innovation Management Techniques and Tools: A Review from Theory and Practice,” R&D Management (38:2), pp. 113–127.
Kautz, K., and. Nielsen, P. A. 2004. “Understanding the Implementation of Software Process Improvement Innovations in Software Organisations,” Information Systems Journal (14:1), pp. 3–22.
Lanzara, G. 1999. “Designing Systems In-Action: Between Transient Constructs and Permanent Structures,” keynote presentation, European Conference on Information Systems, Copenhagen, June 23–25.
Latour, B. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. 1999. “On Recalling ANT,” in Actor Network Theory and After, J. Law and J. Hassard (eds.), Oxford, UK: Blackwell, pp. 15–25.
Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Rogers, E, M. 1962. Diffusion of Innovation, NewYork: Free Press.
Slappendel, C. 1996. “Perspectives on Innovation in Organizations,” Organization Studies (17), pp. 107–129.
Terréi Ohme, E. 2002. “Guide for Managing Innovation,” Centre for Innovation and Business Development, Barcelona, Spain
Tuckman, B. 1965. “Developmental Sequence in Small Groups,” Psychological Bulletin (63), pp. 384–399
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zendejas, G., Chiasson, M. (2008). Reassembling the Information Technology Innovation Process: An Actor Network Theory Method for Managing the Initiation, Production, and Diffusion of Innovations. In: León, G., Bernardos, A.M., Casar, J.R., Kautz, K., De Gross, J.I. (eds) Open IT-Based Innovation: Moving Towards Cooperative IT Transfer and Knowledge Diffusion. TDIT 2008. IFIP – The International Federation for Information Processing, vol 287. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-87503-3_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-87503-3_30
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-87502-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-87503-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)