Abstract
Information technology artefacts are steadily permeating everyday life, just as they have colonized the business domain. Although research in our field has largely addressed the workplace, researchers are beginning to take an interest in the home environment too. Here, we address the domestic realm, focusing on the design of complex, interactive information systems. As such, our work sits in the design science version rather than behavioral science paradigm of IS research. We argue that the home is in many ways a more challenging environment for the designer than the workplace, making good design of critical importance. Regrettably, the opposite would appear to be the norm. Two experiments are reported, both concerned with the design of the user interface for domestic heating systems. Of note is our use of a medium-fidelity laboratory simulation or “microworld” in this work. Two main substantive findings resulted. First, that ecologically designed feedback, embodying a strong mapping between task goals and system status, produced superior task performance. Second, that predictive decision aids provided clear benefits over other forms of user support, such as advisory systems. General implications for the design of domestic information systems are discussed, followed by reflections on the nature of design work in IS, and on the design science project itself. It is concluded that the microworld approach has considerable potential for developing IS design theory. The methodological challenges of design research are highlighted, especially the presence of additional validity threats posed by the need to construct artefacts in order to evaluate theory. It is argued that design theory is necessarily complex, modal, and uncertain, and that design science (like design itself) should be prosecuted in an open, heuristic spirit, drawing more on the proven methods of “good design” (e.g.,prototyping, user participation) in terms of its own praxis.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
References
Bennett, K. B., Payne, M., and Walyers, B. 2005. “An Evaluation of a ‘Time Tunnel’ Display Format for the Presentation of Temporal Information,” Human Factors (47:2), pp. 342–359.
Boland, R., and Collopy, F. 2004. Managing as Designing, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Brehmer B., and Dörner, D. 1993. “Experiments with Computer-Simulated Microworlds: Escaping Both the Narrow Straits of the Laboratory and the Deep Blue Sea of the Field Study,” Computers in Human Behavior (9:2/3), pp. 171–184.
Brown, S. A, and Venkatesh, V. 2005. “Model of Adoption of Technology in Households: A Baseline Model Test and Extension Incorporating Household Lifecycle,” MIS Quarterly (29:3), pp. 399–426.
Chatterjee, S., and Hevner, A. 2006. “Program Co-Chairs Message,” First International Con- ference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology, Claremont Graduate University, February 24–25 (http://ncl.cgu.edu/designconference/Cochairmsg.htm).
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P. R. 1989. “User Acceptance of Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models,” Management Science (35:8), pp. 982–1003.
Elam, J. J., and Leidner, D. G. 1995. “EIS Adoption, Use, and Impact: The Executive Perspective,” Decision Support Systems (14:21), pp. 89–103.
Gregor, S.. 2006. “The Nature of Theory in Information Systems,” MIS Quarterly (30:3), pp. 611–642.
Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., and Ram, S. 2004. “Design Science in Information Systems Research,” MIS Quarterly (28:1), pp. 75–105.
Hung, S. 2003. “Expert vs. Novice Use of Executive Support Systems: An Empirical Study,” Information and Management (40:3), pp. 177–189.
Kroemer, K.,Kroemer, H., and Kroemer-Elbert, K. 2001. Ergonomics: How to Design for Ease and Efficiency, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Locke, E. A., and Latham, G. P. 2002. “Building a Practically Useful Theory of Goal Setting and Task Motivation: A 35 Year Odyssey,” American Psychologist (57:9), pp. 705–717.
March, S. T., and Smith, G. 1995. “Design and Natural Science Research on Information Technology,” Decision Support Systems (15:4), pp. 251–266.
Markus, L.. Majchrzak, A., and Gasser, L. 2002. “A Design Theory for Systems That Support Emergent Knowledge Processes,” MIS Quarterly (26:3), pp. 179–212.
McCalley, L. T., and Midden, C. J. H. 2002. “Energy Conservation Through Product Integrated Feedback: The Roles of Goal-Setting and Social Orientation,” Journal of Economic Psychology (22:5), pp. 589–603.
Norman, D. A. 1988. The Design of Everyday Things, London: MIT Press.
Rasmussen, J., Pejtersen, A. M., and Goodstein, L. P. 1994. Cognitive Systems Engineering, New York: Wiley.
Rasmussen, J., Pejtersen, A. M., and Goodstein, L. P. 1994. Cognitive Systems Engineering, New York: Wiley.
Richardson, A. 1993. “The Death of the Designer,” Design Issues (9:2), pp. 34–43.
Rogers, E. M. 1995. Diffusion of Innovations, New York: The Free Press.
Sarter, N.B., and Schroeder, B. 2001. “Supporting Decision-Making and Action Selection Under Time Pressure and Uncertainty: The Case of In-Flight Icing,” Human Factors (43:4), pp. 573–583.
Sauer, J., Wastell, D., and Hockey, G. R. J. 2000. “Using Micro-Worlds to Simulate Highly-Automated Work Environments: The Case of the Cabin Air Management System,” Computers in Human Behavior (165:1), pp. 45–58.
Sauer, J., Schmeink, C., Wastell, D. 2007. “Feedback Quality and Environmentally Friendly Use of Domestic Central Heating Systems,” Ergonomics (50:6), pp. 795–813.
Sintchenko, V., and Coeira, E. 2003. “Which Clinical Decisions Benefit from Automation: A Task Complexity Approach,” International Journal of Medical Informatics (70:3), pp. 309–316.
Spenkelink, G. P. J. 1990. “Aiding the Operator’s Anticipatory Behavior: The Design of Process State Information,” Applied Ergonomics (21:3), pp. 199–206.
Van Houwelingen, J., and Van Raaij, W. 1989. “The Effect of Goal-Setting and Daily Electronic Feedback on In-Home Energy Use,” Journal of Consumer Research (16:1), pp. 98–105.
Venable, J. R. 2006. “The Role of Theory and Theorizing in Design Science Research,” in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology, S. Chatterjee and A. Hevner (eds.), Claremount Graduate University, February 24–25 (http://ncl.cgu.edu/designconference/DESRIST%202006%20Proceedings/2A_1.pdf).
Venkatesh, V., and Brown, S. 2001. “A Longitudinal Investigation of Personal Computers in Homes: Adoption Determinants and Emerging Challenges,” MIS Quarterly (25:1), pp. 71–102.
Vicente, K. 2003. The Human Factor, New York: Routledge.
Vijayasarathy, L. R. 2004. “Predicting Consumer Intentions to Use On-Line Shopping: The Case for an Augmented Technology Acceptance Model,” Information and Management (41:6), pp. 747–762.
Walls, J. G., Widmeyer, G. R., and El Sawy, O. A. 1992. “Building an Information Systems Design Theory for Vigilant EIS,”. Information Systems Research (3:1), pp. 36–59.
Wastell, D. G. 1997. “Human-Machine Dynamics in Complex Information Systems: The “Microworld” Paradigm as a Heuristic Tool for Developing Theory and Exploring Design Issues,” Information Systems Journal (6:4), pp. 245–260
Wastell D. G., Sauer, J. S., and Hockey, G. R. J. 2993, “Using Micro-Worlds in Research on Distributed Cognition in Complex Dynamic Worlds: A Ten Year Retrospective on the Cabin Air Management System,” in Cognitive Science Approaches to Process Control, G. van der Veer and J. F. Hoorn (eds.), Le Chesnay, France: EACE, pp. 145–150.
Weick, C. 1990. “Organizational Redesign as Improvisation,” in Organizational Change and Redesign, G. Huber and W. Glick (eds.), New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 346–382.
Wickens, C. D., Gordon, S., and Lui, Y. 2000. Introduction to Human Factors Engineering, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson-Prentice Hall.
Wickens, C. D., and Hollands, J. G. 2000. Engineering Psychology and Human Performance, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wastell, D.G., Sauer, J.S., Schmeink, C. (2008). Homeward Bound: Ecological Design of Domestic Information Systems. In: León, G., Bernardos, A.M., Casar, J.R., Kautz, K., De Gross, J.I. (eds) Open IT-Based Innovation: Moving Towards Cooperative IT Transfer and Knowledge Diffusion. TDIT 2008. IFIP – The International Federation for Information Processing, vol 287. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-87503-3_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-87503-3_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-87502-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-87503-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)