Ethical and Medico-Legal Issues in Amputee Prosthetic Rehabilitation
This chapter focuses on ethical and medico-legal issues in amputee prosthetic rehabilitation. Ethics is a critical evaluation of assumptions and arguments and is the study of what we “ought” to do. One ethical cluster of principles includes respect for autonomy, non malefience, beneficence and justice. Health care professionals “think” that they always do what is right for the patient, however in amputee rehabilitation and prosthetics with contracts with private companies there can be business pressures and resultant conflicts.
The primary duty of the clinician is to act in the best interests of the patient. Clinicians make better ethical decisions if they have a chance to think about them. It is only recently that we have begun to address ethical issues in amputee rehabilitation, with such attention previously focusing on acute care issues. Ethical dilemmas relate to goal setting, patient selection, resource allocation, teamwork issues and expectations of patients. There is an element of rationing in health service owing to a lack of resources and doctors are pushed into the role of gatekeepers. This chapter discusses a range of such issues as implicated in amputee prosthetic rehabilitation.
KeywordsClinical Team Lower Limb Amputee Legal Redress Prosthetic Rehabilitation Artificial Limb
- Bauchamp PC, Childress JE (1994) Principles of biomedical ethics, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 190–192Google Scholar
- Gillick V (1986) West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority and another 3 All ER 402 (HL)Google Scholar
- Harris J (1997) A value of life: an introduction to medical ethics. Routledge, Great Britain, pp 205–206Google Scholar
- Mental Capacity Act (2005) Crown copyright. LondonGoogle Scholar
- NASDAB (2005) National amputee statistical database, crown copyright, Edinburgh. Accessed from website http://www.nasdab.co.uk