Virtual Solutions to Phantom Problems: Using Immersive Virtual Reality to Treat Phantom Limb Pain
Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a common consequence of amputation, and many persons with amputations experience vivid sensations of pain in the absent body part. PLP can persist for many years post-amputation and is very difficult to treat, since its aetiology is hard to determine. However, converging lines of evidence demonstrate that when visual feedback is manipulated appropriately to represent movement of an amputee’s absent limb, it can evoke kinesthetic sensations of movement in that limb and decrease PLP. Most notably, the mirror box – where a mirror is placed vertically in front of the person with an amputation – is used in such a way as to reflect the image of an intact limb onto the phenomenal space of the absent or phantom limb. When amputees orient towards this mirror image kinaesthetic sensations can be evoked in the muscles and joints of their phantom limb, and PLP can be decreased.
Some researchers have highlighted limitations in the flexibility of the mirror box in providing a fully robust illusion of an absent limb as intact. Recently, three research groups have developed virtual reality systems informed by mirror-box work for the treatment of PLP. Although similar in intent and design, these systems have subtle differences. This chapter will outline these systems along with empirical findings, with a particular emphasis on the authors’ own virtual reality system.
KeywordsPhantom Limb Virtual Reality System Phantom Limb Pain Data Glove Phantom Pain
- Cole J, Crowle S, Austwick G, Henderson Slater D (2009) Exploratory findings with virtual reality for phantom limb pain; from stump motion to agency and analgesia. Disabil Rehabil 31(10):846–854Google Scholar
- Katz J (1992) Psychophysiological contribution to phantom limbs. Can J Psychiatr 37:282–298Google Scholar
- Kuttuva M, Flint JA, Burdea G, Phillips SLP, Craelius W (2003) VIA: A virtual interface for the arm of upper-limb amputees. Proc Second Int Workshop Virtual Rehabil:119–126Google Scholar
- Murray CD (2004) An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the embodiment of artificial limbs. Disability and Rehabilitation 26(16):963–973Google Scholar
- Murray CD, Pettifer S, Caillette F, Patchick E, Howard T (2005) Immersive virtual reality as a rehabilitative technology for phantom limb experience. University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA Proc Fourth Int Workshop Virtual Real:144–151Google Scholar
- Murray CD, Patchick E, Caillette F, Howard T, Pettifer S (2006b) Can immersive virtual reality reduce phantom limb pain? In: Westwood JD, Haluck RS, Hoffman HM, Mogel GT, Phillips R, Robb RA, Vosburgh KG (eds) Medicine meets virtual reality: Accelerating change in healthcare: Next medical toolkit. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 407–412Google Scholar
- Murray CD, Patchick EL, Pettifer S, Howard T, Caillette F, Kulkarni J, Bamford C (2006c) Investigating the efficacy of a virtual mirror-box in treating phantom limb pain in a sample of chronic sufferers. Int J Disabil Hum Dev 5:227–234Google Scholar
- O’Neill K, de Paor A, MacLachlan M, McDarby G (2003) An investigation into the performance of a virtual mirror-box for the treatment of phantom limb pain in amputees using augmented reality technology. In: Human-computer-interaction international 2003, conference proceedings. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., LondonGoogle Scholar
- Phillips H (2000) They do it with mirrors – Who’d have thought that you could make the brain pay attention to a useless limb, or even exercise a phantom one, with only a mirror for help. New Sci 166:26–29Google Scholar
- Popescu VG, Burdea GC, Bouzit M, Hentz VR (2000) A virtual-reality-based telerehabilitation system with force feedback. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 4(1):45–51Google Scholar