This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Boitani, L. 2003. Wolf conservation and recovery. In Wolves: Behavior, Ecology, and Conservation, eds. L. D. Mech and L. Boitani, pp. 317–340. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Chavez, A. S., Gese, E. M., and Krannich, R. S. 2005. Attitudes of rural landowners toward wolves in northwestern Minnesota. Wildlife Society Bulletin 33:517–527.
Gehring, T. M., and Potter, B. A. 2005. Wolf habitat analysis in Michigan: an example of the need for proactive land management for carnivore species. Wildlife Society Bulletin 33:1237–1244.
Haight, R. C., Travis, L. E., Nimerfro, K., and Mech, L. D. 2002. Computer simulation of wolf-removal strategies for animal damage control. Wildlife Society Bulletin 30:844–852.
Kyle, C. J., Johnson, A. R., Patterson, B. R., Wilson, P. J., Shami, K., Grewal, S. K., and White, B. N. 2006. Genetic nature of eastern wolves, past, present and future. Conservation Genetics 7:273–287.
Mech, L. D. 1970. The Wolf: Ecology and Behavior of an Endangered Species. Garden City, NY: Natural History Press.
Michigan Department of Natural Resources. 2008. Michigan Wolf Management Plan, Wildlife Division Report No. 3484. Lansing, MI: Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Wildlife Division.
Morell, V. 2008. Wolves at the door of a dangerous world. Science 319:890–892.
Naughton-Treves, L., Grossberg, R., and Treves, A. 2003. Paying for tolerance: rural citizens’ attitudes toward wolf depredation and compensation. Conservation Biology 17:1500–1511.
Nie, M. A. 2003. Beyond Wolves: The Politics of Wolf Recovery and Management. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Radeloff, V. C., Hammer, R. B., and Stewart, S. I. 2005. Sprawl and forest fragmentation in the U.S. Midwest from 1940 to 2000. Conservation Biology 19:793–805.
Stephenson, R. O., Ballard, W. B., Smith, C. A., and Richardson, K. 1995. Wolf biology and management in Alaska 1981–92. In Ecology and Conservation of Wolves in a Changing World, eds. L. N. Carbyn, S. H. Fritts, and D. R. Seip, pp. 43–54. Edmonton, AB: Canadian Circumpolar Institute.
U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2008. Final rule designating the Northern Rocky Mountain population of gray wolves as a Distinct Population Segment and removing this Distinct Population Segment from the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Species. Federal Register 73(39):10514–10560.
Vucetich, J. A., Nelson, M. P., and Phillips, M. K. 2006. The normative and legal meaning of endangered and recovery in the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Conservation Biology 20:1383–1390.
Williams, C. K., Ericsson, G., and Heberlein, T. A. 2002. A quantitative summary of attitudes toward wolves and their reintroduction (1972–2000). Wildlife Society Bulletin 30:575–584.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wydeven, A., Van Deelen, T., Heske, E. (2009). Wolf Recovery in the Great Lakes Region: What Have We Learned and Where Will We Go Now?. In: Wydeven, A.P., Van Deelen, T.R., Heske, E.J. (eds) Recovery of Gray Wolves in the Great Lakes Region of the United States. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85952-1_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85952-1_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-85951-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-85952-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)