The Role of the Endangered Species Act in Midwest Wolf Recovery



Recovery Plan Gray Wolf Wolf Population Endangered Status Wolf Management 


  1. Fuller, T. K., Berg, W. E., Radde, G. L., Lenarz, M. S., and Joselyn, G. B. 1992. A history and current estimate of wolf distribution and numbers in Minnesota. Wildlife Society Bulletin 20:42–54.Google Scholar
  2. Hammill, J. 1992. Wolf reproduction confirmed on mainland Michigan. International Wolf 2: 14–15.Google Scholar
  3. Mech, L. D., and Nowak, R. M. 1981. Return of the gray wolf to Wisconsin. American Midland Naturalist 105:408–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. USFWS. 1978. Recovery plan for the eastern timber wolf. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.Google Scholar
  5. USFWS. 1992. Recovery plan for the eastern timber wolf. Twin Cities, MN: US Fish and Wildlife Service.Google Scholar
  6. Wilson, P. J., Grewal, S., Lawford, I. D., Heal, J. N. M., Granacki, A. G., Pennock, D., Theberge, J. B., Theberge, M. T., Voigt, D. R., Waddell, W., Chambers, R. E., Paquet, P. C., Goulet, G., Cluff, D., and White, B. N. 2000. DNA profiles of the eastern Canadian wolf and the red wolf provide evidence for a common evolutionary history independent of the gray wolf. Canadian Journal of Zoology 78:2156–2166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Wisconsin DNR. 1989. Wisconsin Timber Wolf Recovery Plan. Wisconsin Endangered Resources Report 50. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.Google Scholar
  8. Wydeven, A. P., Schultz, R. N., and Thiel, R. P. 1995. Monitoring of a recovering gray wolf population in Wisconsin, 1979–1991. In Ecology and Conservation of Wolves in a Changing World, eds. L. N. Carbyn, S. H. Fritts, and D. R. Seip, pp. 147–156. Edmonton, AB, Canada: Canadian Circumpolar Institute.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.US Fish and Wildlife ServiceFederal BuildingFort SnellingUSA

Personalised recommendations