The Use of Data Sources of Medication Information — a Finnish Primary Care Organization in the Light of National e-Health Scenarios

  • Eeva Aarnio
  • Reetta Raitoharju
Part of the IFIP – The International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 286)


Many areas of the healthcare sector are information-rich and data-intensive, and often lack of time is a problem. Patient-specific medication information is often seen as highly important part of patient data for patients’ safe treatment and therefore the availability of it should be guaranteed. The aim of this paper is to study healthcare professionals’ perceptions of their utilization of sources of medication information and to assess it in the light of national e-Health scenarios using a Finnish primary care organization as a case study. The healthcare professionals reported frequent use of the patient as a source of information as they could not be convinced of the correctness of the medication lists in the electronic patient record. The future e-Health solutions should be usable and guarantee the correctness and completeness of the medication information if the clinical workers are expected to use them. The valuable information provided by the patients could be also exploited more efficiently in the future.


Healthcare Professional Medication Information Electronic Patient Record Healthcare Sector Medication List 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Chiasson, M., Reddy, M.C., Kaplan, B., and Davidson, E.: Expanding multi-disciplinary ap- proaches to healthcare information technologies: What does information systems offer medical informatics?, International Journal of Medical Informatics (2007), Vol. 76, No. S1, pp. S89-S97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reddy, M.C. and Spence, P.R.: Collaborative information seeking: A field study of a multidisci-plinary patient care team, Information Processing & Management (2008), Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 242-255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reddy, M.C., Pratt, W., Dourish, P., and Shabot, M. Asking Questions: Information Needs in a Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association Fall Symposium AMIA'02. San Antonio, TX 2002.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hagland, M.: Intensive Care: The Next Level for IT, Health Management Technology (1998), Vol. 19, No. 13, pp. 18 (6 pages)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gorman, P.N.: Information Needs of Physicians, Journal of the American Society for Information Science (1995), Vol. 46, No. 10, pp. 729-736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ely, J.W., Osheroff, J.A., Ebell, M.H., Chambliss, M.L., Vinson, D.C., Stevermer, J.J., and Pifer, E.A.: Obstacles to answering doctors' questions about patient care with evidence: qualitative study, British Medical Journal (2002), Vol. 324, No. 7339, pp. 710 (7 pages)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dawes, M. and Sampson, U.: Knowledge management in clinical practice: a systematic review of information seeking behavior in physicians, International Journal of Medical Informatics (2003), Vol. 71, No. 1, pp. 9-15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    González-González, A.I., Dawes, M., Sánchez-Mateos, J., Riesgo-Fuertes, R., Escortell-Mayor, E., Sanz-Cuesta, T., and Hernández-Fernández, T.: Information Needs and Information-Seeking Behavior of Primary Care Physicians, Annals of Family Medicine (2007), Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 345-352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McGettigan, P., Golden, J., Fryer, J., Chan, R., and Feely, J.: Prescribers prefer people: The sources of information used by doctors for prescribing suggest that the medium is more important than the message, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (2001), Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 184-189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kuperman, G.J., Bobb, A., Payne, T.H., Avery, A.J., Gandhi, T.K., Burns, G., Classen, D.C., and Bates, D.W.: Medication-related Clinical Decision Support in Computerized Provider Order En- try Systems: A Review, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (2007), Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 29-40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Engeström, Y.: Objects, contradictions and collaboration in medical cognition: an activity- theoretical perspective, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (1995), Vol. 7, No. 5, pp. 395-412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oliveri, R.S., Gluud, C., and Wille-Jorgensen, P.A.: Hospital doctors' self-rated skills in and use of evidence-based medicine - a questionnaire survey, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice (2004), Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 219-226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brown, P.J., Borowitz, S.M., and Novicoff, W.: Information exchange in the NICU: what sources of patient data do physicians prefer to use?, International Journal of Medical Informatics (2004), Vol. 73, No. 4, pp. 349-355Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alvarez, G. and Coiera, E.: Interdisciplinary communication: An uncharted source of medical er- ror?, Journal of Critical Care (2006), Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 236-242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Coiera, E.: When Conversation Is Better Than Computation, Journal of the American Medical Association (2000), Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 277-286Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eeva Aarnio
    • 1
  • Reetta Raitoharju
    • 1
  1. 1.Turku School of EconomicsInformation Systems ScienceTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations