Science and Logic Meet the Law

  • John G. Peters

Science is technical, making it more than a superficial read for the nonscientist. The legal process can be equally challenging to the nonlawyer, especially when science and law collide in the courtroom.


Emergency Medical Service Medical Examiner Causation Theory Expert Testimony Expert Witness 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The author thanks Judy Melinek, M.D., Gregg J. Gunta, J.D., Kevin Reak, J.D., John Wolfgang, J.D., Wayne Schmidt, J.D., L.L.M., Michael A. Brave, J.D., William D. Steeves, Jr., Ed.D., and David A. Donovan, M.A. for their insightful comments and for their peer review of this work. Thanks to Rebecca Bours for proofreading several drafts. They are very gracious, but are not responsible for any errors.


  1. 1.
    Peters JG Jr. The Graduation Party. Henderson, NV: Institute for the Prevention of In-Custody Deaths, Inc.; 2007.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    The Committee on Pattern Civil Jury Instructions of the Seventh Circuit. Federal Civil Jury Instructions of the Seventh Circuit.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ruby Mann, et al. v. Taser International, Inc., et al. Order. United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Rome Division; October 1, 2007.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Federal Rules of Evidence: Rule 702.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moore NM, Parker R. Critical Thinking. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company; 1986.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kuhmo Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hollingsworth JG, Lasker EG. Testing claims of adverse drug effects in the courtroom. In: Karch SB, ed. Drug Abuse Handbook. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2007: 1156–1173.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hollingsworth JG, Lasker EG. The case against differential diagnosis: Daubert medical causation testimony, and the scientific method. J Health Law. 2004; 37(1): 85–111.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    General Electric Co. v. Joiner, 522 U.S. 136; 1997.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gunta GG. Daubert Issues in Excited Delirium Cases. Milwaukee, WI: Gunta & Reak, S.C.; 2007.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Graziano AM, Raulin ML. Research Methods. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 2000.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Judge Bans Jurors From Watching CSI Shows. American Police Beat Oct. 2007:42.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ho JD. Sudden In-Custody Death. Police Magazine 2005; 29(8): 47–55.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Peters JG Jr. Sudden death, ‘excited’ delirium, and issues of force: Part I. Police & Security News 2006; 22(1): 104–107.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Peters JG Jr. Sudden death, ‘excited’ delirium, and issues of force: Part II. Police & Security News 2006; 22(2).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leedy, PD. Practical Research. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.; 1974.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zikmund, WG. Business Research Methods. 7th ed. United States: South-Western; 2003.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cresswell JW. Research Design: Qualitative & Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1994.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Breakwell GM, Hammond S, Fife-Schaw C. Research Methods in Psychology. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications; 2000.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cook TD, Campbell DT. Quasi-Experimentation. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company; 1979.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Silverman D. Doing Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2000.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bickman L. ed. Research Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2000.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dennis AJ, Valentino, AJ, Walter RJ, et al. Acute Effects of TASER X26 Discharges in a Swine Model. J Trauma, 2007; 63: 581–590.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rubin HJ. Applied Social Research. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill; 1983.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nachmias D, Nachmias C. Research Methods in the Social Sciences. New York: St. Martin’s Press; 1981.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kerlinger FN. Foundations of behavioral research. 2nd ed. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston, Inc.; 1964.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Berenson A. Claims Over Tasers’ Safety are Challenged. New York Times. New York: New York Times, 2004.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Reay DT, Howard JD, Fligner CL, Ward RJ. Effects of positional restraint on oxygen saturation and heart rate following exercise. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1988; 9(1):16–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    American Psychological Association; 2001.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Polit DF, Beck C T. Nursing research: Principles and practices. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippencott Williams & Wilkins; 2004.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    §46.111. Code of Federal Regulations; 1991.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Minimum EW, King BM, Bear G. Statistical Reasoning in Psychology and Education. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1993.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gravetter FJ, Wallnau LB. Essentials of Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. 3rd ed. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company; 1999.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cascio WF. Applied Psychology in Human Resource Management. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1998.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Dennis AJ, Valentino DJ, Walter RJ, Nagy KK, Winners J, Bokhari F, Wiley DE, Joseph KT, Roberts RR. Acute effects of TASER X26 discharges in a swine model. J Trauma 2007;63:581–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Walter RJ, Dennis AJ, Valentino DJ, Margeta B, Nagy KK, Bokhari F, Wiley DE, Joseph KT, Roberts RR. TASER X26 discharges in swine produce potentially fatal ventricular arrhythmias. Acad Emerg Med 2008;15:66–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jaisingh LR. Statistics for the Utterly Confused. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2000.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jacobs D, Blackburn H, Higging M, Reed D, Iso H, McMillan G, Neaton J, Nelson J, Potter J, Rifkind B, et al. Report of the conference on low blood cholesterol: Mortality associations. Circulation 1992;86:1046–1060.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ho JD, Miner JF, Lakireddy DR, et al. Cardiovascular and physiologic effects of conducted electrical weapon discharge in resting adults. Acad Emerg Med. 2006; 13:589–595.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ho JD, Dawes DM, et al. Absence of electrocardiographic change following prolonged application of a conducted electrical weapon in physically exhausted adults. Acad Emerg Med. 2007 (Suppl. 1); 14:S128–S129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ho JD, Dawes DM, et al. Respiratory effect of prolonged electrical weapon application on human volunteers. Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Mar; 14(3): 197–201.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Dawes D, Ho, J et al. 15-second conducted electrical weapon application does not impair basic respiratory parameters, venous blood gases, or blood chemistries and does not increase core body temperatures. Ann Emerg Med. 2007; 50(3):S132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Levine SD, Sloane C, Chan TC, Vilke GM, Dunford J. Cardiac monitoring of subjects exposed to the Taser. Acad Emerg Med. 2005; 12(Suppl. 1): 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sloane C, Vilke GM, et al. Serum Tronopin I measurement of subjects exposed to the Taser X26. Acad Emerg Med. 2007 (Suppl. 1); 14: S103–S104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Vilke, GM, Sloane C, et al. Cardiovascular and metabolic Effects of the TASER on Human Subjects. Acad Emerg Med. 2007 (Suppl. 1); 14: S104–S105.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Vilke GM, Sloane CM, Levine S, Neuman T, Castillo EM, Chan TC. Twelve lead ECG monitoring of subjects before and after voluntary exposure to the Taser X-26. Am J Emerg Med. 2007. In press.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Reay DT. Positional asphyxia during law enforcement transport. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1993; 14(2):170–175.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Chan TC, Vilke GM, Neuman T, Clausen JL. Restraint position and positional asphyxia. Ann Emerg Med Ann Emerg Med, 1997; 30(5): 578–586.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Cruz v. City of Laramie, 239 F.3d 1183 (10th Cir. 2001).Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Price, et al. v. San Diego, et al, 990 F. Supp. 1230 (S.D. Cal.) (1998).Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Phillips JL. How to Think About Statistics. 6th ed. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company; 2000.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.;1988.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    The Nizkor Project. Fallacies. Available at: Accessed March 26, 2006.
  55. 55.
    Aldisert RJ. Logic for Lawyers. 3rd ed. South Bend, IN: National Institute for Trial Advocacy; 1997.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Epstein RL. Critical Thinking. 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth; 2002.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Better Business Bureau. If It’s In Print, It Must Be True. Available at: Accessed March 26, 2006.
  58. 58.
    Card H. If it is in the Paper it must be True. Available at: Accessed March 24, 2006.
  59. 59.
    Napoli L. If it’s on the Internet, it must be true. Available at: story/technology. Accessed March 26, 2006.
  60. 60.
    Ho JD, Miner, JR, Heegaard, WG, Reardon, RF. Deaths in American Custody: A 12-month Surveillance Study.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Bermudez v. TRC Holdings, 138 F.3d 1176 (7th Cir.1998).Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    See Oest v. Illinois Department of Corrections, 240 F 3e 605, 616 & n.8 (7th Cir. 2001).Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Schmaltz v. Norfolk & Western Ry. Co., 878 F. Supp. 1119, 1122 (N.D. Ill. 1995). See also, Conde v. Velsicol Chemical Corp., 804 F. Supp. 972, 1023 (S.D. Ohio 1992), aff’d, 24 F.3d 809 (6th Cir. 1994); Porter v. Whitehall laboratories, Inc., 9 F.3d 607, 611 (7th Cir. 1993); Cuevas v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours and Co., 956 F. Supp. 1306, 1310-11 (S.D. Miss. 1997); Cartwright v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 936 F. Supp. 900 906 (M.D. Fla. 1996); Cavallo v. Star Enterprise, 892 F. Supp. 756, 757 (E.D. Va. 1995), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, 100 F.3d 1150 (4th Cir. 1996), cert denied, 522 U.S. 1044 (1998).Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    In re Breast Implant Litigation, 11 F. Supp.2d 1217, 1238 (D. Colo. 1998).Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Felony-Murder Rule. Available at: Accessed January 24, 2008.
  66. 66.
    Kohler LJ. Report of Investigation: Richard Thomas Holcomb. Akron, OH: Medical Examiner, County of Summit; 2005.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Curtis M. Excited Delirium Conference. New Berlin, Wisconsin, 2007.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Taser International, Inc. And City Of Akron v. Chief Medical Examiner Of Summit County, Ohio Cv 2006-11-7421: In The Court of Common Pleas: Summit County, Ohio, 2008.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Morgan J. Medical Panel Issues Interim Findings on Stun Gun Safety. National Institute of Justice Journal 2008; 261: 20–23.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Fishbain DA. The Nosology, Identification, Pathophysiology and Treatment of Various Types of Delirium. 3rd Annual Sudden Death, Excited Delirium & In-Custody Death Conference. Las Vegas, Nevada, 2008.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • John G. Peters

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations