Skip to main content

Handling Contradictions in Knowledge Discovery Applications

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the European Computing Conference

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 28))

  • 568 Accesses

Abstract

There have been a number of very credible attempts to devise paraconsistent logics to deal with the problems caused by the unavoidability of contradictions in knowledge bases and elsewhere. This paper suggests a set of principles for generating logical operator semantics which are broadly drawn from classical logic. These lead directly to a paraconsistent logic, LM4, which significantly outperforms other systems and solves the problem for all practical purposes without giving rise to the difficulties inherent in other attempted solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    FN>1 I will not deal here with the issue of contracting knowledge bases as it has little bearing on the main issue I want to address.

  2. 2.

    LM3 is the subject of a separate paper.

References

  1. Quine WVO (1948) On what there is. The Review of Metaphysics 2:21–28, Reprint in: From a logical Point of View, Cambridge, Harvard University Press (1980), p 18

    Google Scholar 

  2. Priest G (1979) The logic of paradox. J Philos Logic, p 226

    Google Scholar 

  3. Priest G (1979) The logic of paradox. Journal Philos Logic, p 235

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lewis D (1982) A logic for equivocators. Noûs 16(3):431–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lenat DB, Feigenbaum EA (1991) On the thresholds of knowledge. Artif Int 47:217–222

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Copeland BJ (1993) Artificial intelligence: A philosophical introduction. Blackwell, Oxford, p 120

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lemmon EJ (1992) Beginning Logic. Hackett, pp 1–83

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Anderson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this paper

Cite this paper

Anderson, D. (2009). Handling Contradictions in Knowledge Discovery Applications. In: Mastorakis, N., Mladenov, V., Kontargyri, V. (eds) Proceedings of the European Computing Conference. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 28. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85437-3_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85437-3_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-84818-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-85437-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics