Advertisement

Risk Assessment and Management Strategies at Local Level

  • Tim Yates
  • Miloš Drdácký
  • Stanislav Pospíšil
  • Terje Grøntoft
Chapter

This chapter looks at ways that the techniques and procedures described in the previous chapters can serve as tools for owners and managers including local authorities responsible for objects of cultural heritage. All of them have their benefits and usually a combined use of some of them can be an efficient tool in the efforts of reducing the risk and consequently the maintenance cost. The chapter examines ways that mapping and modelling can be used to build extra layers onto the earlier maps and extrapolations presented for pollution. Pollution maps are developed into corrosion and soiling maps by application of the dose-response functions presented in Chapters 3 and 4. This chapter returns to the theme of scale and shows how broad patterns may be transformed by local influences.

Keywords

Cultural Heritage Deposition Velocity Indoor Concentration Historical Monument Indoor Source 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to all the members of CULT-STRAT and other co-operative projects for their help with this chapter. We are grateful to Petr Měchura, ITAM and Petr Chotěbor from the Czech President’s Office.

References

References

  1. Bacci, M., Cucci, C., Dupont, A.-L., Lavédrine, B., Picollo, M. and Porcinai, S. (2003) Disposable indicators for monitoring lighting conditions in museums. Environmental Science and Technology, 37, 5687–5694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blades, N., Oreszczyn, T., Bordass B. and Cassar, M. (2000) Guidelines on pollution control in museum buildings. Published by the Museums Association and distributed with MUSEUM PRACTICE, 15, Nov. London.Google Scholar
  3. Blades, N., Grøntoft, T., Dahlin, E., Taylor, J. and Rentmeister, S. (2006) Chap. 2.2.3. Advantages of dosimetry as an environmental monitoring strategy. In Dahlin, E. (Ed.) EU project MASTER (EVK-CT-2002-00093) Publishable Final Report “The MASTER Early Warning System and Preventive Conservation Strategy”.Google Scholar
  4. Brimblecombe, P., Blades, N., Camuffo, D., Sturado, G., Valentino, A., Gysels, K., Van Grieten, R., Busse, H.-J., Kim, O., Ulrych, U. and Wieser, M. (1999) The Indoor Environment of a Modern Museum Building, the Sainsbury Centre for Visual Arts, Norwich, UK. Indoor Air, 9, 146–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brimblecombe, P. (1990) The composition of museum atmospheres. Atmospheric Environment, 24B, 1–8.Google Scholar
  6. Brimblecombe, P., (1988) The composition of museum atmospheres. Atmospheric Environment 24B(1), pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
  7. Brimblecombe, P. (2006). Composition and Chemistry of Museum Air. Plenary Presentation to the 7th Indoor Air Quality 2006 Meeting (IAQ2006). Braunschweig, Germany, 15–17 November 2006.Google Scholar
  8. Bullock, L. and Saunders, D. (1999) Measurement of cumulative exposure using Blue Wool standards. In: ICOM-CC 12th Triennial, Lyon. Ed. by: J. Bridgland. London, James and James. pp. 21–26.Google Scholar
  9. Camuffo, D., Van Grieken, R., Busse, H.-J., Sturaro, G., Valentino, A., Bernardi, A., Blades, N., Shooter, D., Gysels, K., Deutsch, F., Wieser, M., Kim, O. and Ulrych, U. (2001) Environmental monitoring in four European museums. Atmospheric Environment, 35, Supplement No. 1, pp. S127–S140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cano-Ruiz, J.A., Kong, D., Balas, R.B., Nazaroff, W.W. (1993) Removal of reactive gases at indoor surfaces. Combining mass transport and surface kinetics. Atmospheric Environment, 27 A(13): 2039–2050.Google Scholar
  11. Cass, R.G., Nazaroff, W.W., Tiller, C. and Whitmore, P.M. (1991) Protection of works of art from damage due to atmospheric ozone. Atmospheric Environment, 25A, 441–451.Google Scholar
  12. Chaloulakou, A. and Mavroidis, I. (2002) Comparison of indoor and outdoor concentrations of CO at a public school. Evaluation of an indoor air quality model. Atmospheric Environment, 36, 1769–1781.Google Scholar
  13. Chen, F., Yu, S.C.M. and Lai, A.C.K. (2006) Modelling particle distribution and deposition in indoor environments with a new drift–flux model. Atmospheric Environment, 40, 357–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Czop, J. (2002). Air Pollution Deposition in Museums. Proceedings of the 5th EC Conference, May 16–18 2002, Krakow Poland.Google Scholar
  15. Dahlin, E. (Ed.). (2006) EU project MASTER (EVK-CT-2002-00093) Publishable Final Report “The MASTER Early Warning System and Preventive Conservation Strategy”.Google Scholar
  16. Dahlin, E., Grøntoft, T., Rentmeister, S, Calnan, C., Czop, J., Hallet, K., Howell, D., Pitzen, C. and Sommer Larsen, A. (2005) Development of an early warning sensor for assessing deterioration of organic materials indoor in museums, historic buildings and archives. In: 14th Triennial Meeting The Hague, 12–16 September 2005, Preprints, Volume II, 617–624.Google Scholar
  17. Gegisian, I. (2007) Assessing the contribution of local air quality management to environmental justice in Eng-land and Wales. Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol.Google Scholar
  18. Dimitropoulou, C., Ashmore, M.R., Byrne, M.A. and Kinnersley, R.P. (2001) Modelling of indoor exposure to nitrogen dioxide in UK. Atmospheric Environment, 35, 269–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Druzik, J.R., Adams, M.S., Tiller, C. and Cass, G.R. (1990) The measurement and model predictions of indoor ozone concentrations in museums. Atmospheric Environment, 24A, 1813–1823.Google Scholar
  20. Ekberg, L.E. (1994) Outdoor Air Contaminants and Indoor Air Quality under Transient Conditions. Indoor Air, 4, 189–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fan, Y. (1995) CFD modelling of the air and contaminant distribution in rooms. Energy and Buildings, 23, 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fuchs, D.R., Roemich, H. and Schmidt, H. (1991) Glass-Sensors: Assessment of complex corrosive stresses in conservation research, Materials Research Society symposia proceedings, 185, 239–251.Google Scholar
  23. Grøntoft, T. (2004) Deposition of Gaseous pollutants to indoor material surfaces. Time, humidity and temperature dependent deposition of O3, NO2 and SO2. Measurement and modelling. Thesis for the degree of dr. scient. Department of Chemistry. Series of dissertations submitted to the Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences. University of Oslo. No. 324. Unipub AS, Oslo.Google Scholar
  24. Grøntoft, T., Henriksen J. F., Dahlin, E., Lazaridis, M., Czop, J., Sommer-Larsen, A., Hallett, K., Calnan, C., Pitzen, C. and Cassar, J.A. (2005 a) Sensor and environmental data from the field test programme. EU project MASTER (EVK-CT-2002-00093) Deliverable no. D. 3.1, WP 3. Restricted data file report to the European Commission.Google Scholar
  25. Grøntoft, T. and Raychaudhuri M. R. (2004) Compilation of tables of surface deposition velocities for O3, NO2 and SO2 to a range of indoor surfaces. Atmospheric Environment, 38(4), 533–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gysels, K., Delalieux, F., Deutsch, F., Van Grieken, R., Camuffo, D., Bernardi, A., Sturaro, G., Busee, H-J. and Wieser, M., (2004) Indoor environment and conservation in the Royal Museum of Fine Arts, Antwerp, Belgium. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 5, 221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hayes, S.R. (1989) Estimating the effect of being indoors on total personal exposure to outdoor air pollution. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association, 39, 1453–1461.Google Scholar
  28. Hayes, S.R. (1991) Use of an indoor air quality model (IAQM) to estimate indoor ozone levels. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 41, 161–170.Google Scholar
  29. IMPACT, 2006. EU project IMPACT EVK-CT-2000-00031. Innovative Modelling of Museum Pollution and Conservation Thresholds. www.ucl.ac.uk/sustainableheritage/impact
  30. ISO 11 844 Corrosion of metals and alloys — Classification of low corrosivity of indoor atmospheres — Part 1: Determination and estimation of indoor corrosivity.Google Scholar
  31. Jones, A.P. (1999) Indoor air quality and health. Atmospheric Environment, 33, 4535–4564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kucera, V. (2005) EU project MULTI-ASSESS. Model for multi pollutant impact and assessment of threshold levels for cultural heritage. EVK4-CT-2001-00044. Final Publishable Report.Google Scholar
  33. Larsen, R. (Ed.) (1996) Deterioration and conservation of vegetable tanned leather, European Commission, Environment Leather Project, Research report no. 6.Google Scholar
  34. Lazaridis M., Glytsos, T., Aleksandropoulou V. and Kopanakis I. (2006) Chap. 2.2.4, Indoor/outdoor modelling. In Dahlin, E. (Ed.) EU project MASTER (EVK-CT-2002-00093) Publishable Final Report “The MASTER Early Warning System and Preventive Conservation Strategy”.Google Scholar
  35. Lazaridis, M., Glytsos, T., Grøntoft, T., Blades, N., Aleksandropoulou, V. and Kopanakis, I. (2006) Chap. 2.5. The use of Indoor/outdoor modelling for cultural heritage sites. In Dahlin, E. (Ed.) EU project MASTER (EVK-CT-2002-00093) Publishable Final Report “The MASTER Early Warning System and Preventive Conservation Strategy”.Google Scholar
  36. Leißner, J. and Fuchs, D.R. (1992) Glass sensors: A European study to estimate the effectiveness of protective glazing at different cathedrals. Proceedings of Congreso Internacional de Rehabilitacion del Patrimonio Arquitectonico y Edificacion, Islas Canarias, 285–290.Google Scholar
  37. Liu, De-Ling and Nazaroff, W.W. (2001) Modelling pollutant penetration across building envelopes. Atmospheric Environment, 35, 4451–4462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. MASTER (2006) (EVK-CT-2002-00093) www.nilu.no/master/
  39. Matthews, G. (2006). Safeguarding heritage at risk: disaster management in United Kingdom archives, libraries and museums. UK survey results – summary. www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/dis/disresearch/heritage%20 at%20risk/Uksurveyresults.pdf Validated 31/08/07.
  40. Mitchell G and Dorling D (2003) An environmental justice analysis of British air quality. Environment and Planning A, 35, 909–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Muller, C., Corel, R. and van Dijke, R. (2006). Air Quality Monitoring in European Museums 2000 – present. Plenary Presentation to the 7th Indoor Air Quality 2006 Meeting (IAQ2006). Braunschweig, Germany, 15–17 November 2006.Google Scholar
  42. Nazaroff, W.W. and Liu, De-Ling (2001) Modelling pollutant penetration across building envelopes. Atmospheric Environment, 35, 4451–4462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nazaroff, W.W. and Cass, G.R. (1986) Mathematical modelling of chemically reactive pollutants to indoor air. Environmental Science and Technology, 20, 924–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Oddy, W.A. (1973) An unsuspected danger in display. Museums Journal, 73, 27–28.Google Scholar
  45. Odlyha, M., Wade, N., Wang, Q. et al., (2005) “Microclimate Monitoring: damage assessment for cultural heritage preservation “ Preprints Vol. 2 (p. 670–677) 14th Triennial Meeting The Hague 12–16 September 2005.Google Scholar
  46. Papakonstantinou, K.A., Kiranoudis, C.T. and Markatos, N.C. (2000) Mathematical modelling of environmental conditions inside historical buildings. The case of the archaeological museum of Athens. Energy and Buildings 31, 211–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sebera, D. K. (1994) Isoperms: An environmental Management Tool. Commission of Preservation and Access, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  48. Salmon, L.G., Cass, G.R. and Bruckman, J.H. (2000) Ozone exposure in the historic central district of Krakow, Poland (2000). Atmospheric Environment, 34, 3823–3832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Spengler, J.D. and Sexton, K. (1983) Indoor air pollution: a public health perspective. Science, 221, 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Taylor, J., Blades, N., Cassar, M., Grøntoft, T., Dahlin, E., Rentmeister, S., Hanko, H. and Heinze, J. (2006) Chap. 2.7. Preventive Conservation Strategy. In: Dahlin, E. (Ed.) EU project MASTER (EVK-CT-2002-00093) Publishable Final Report “The MASTER Early Warning System and Preventive Conservation Strategy”.Google Scholar
  51. Tetreault, J. (2003) Airborne Pollutants in Museums, Galleries, and Archives: Risk Assessment, Control Strategies, and Preservation Management. Canadian Conservation Institute, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  52. Thatcher, T.L. and Layton, D.W. (1994) Deposition, resuspension, and penetration of particles within a residence. Atmospheric Environment, 29, 1487–1497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Weschler, S. J. and Shields, H.C. (1997) Potential reactions among indoor pollutants. Atmospheric Environment, 31(21): 3487–3495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zinn, E., Reilly, J. M., Adelstein, P. Z. and Nishimura, D. W. (1994) Air pollution effects on library microforms. In: Preventive Conservation Practice, Theory and Research. Preprints on the Contributions to the Ottawa Congress, 12–16 September 1994. Ed. by: Roy, A. and Smith, P. London, IIC, pp. 195–201.Google Scholar

Sources of Additional Information

  1. Further information on the Rapid Assessment kits for damage assessment and their availability can be found on the homepage of the CULT-STRAT project at http://www.swereakimab.se/web/page.aspx?pageid=8529
  2. IAQ, Indoor Air Quality in museums and archives, http://iaq.dk/index.html – index
  3. (This page gives links to other indoor air quality and conservation resources)Google Scholar
  4. NIST Multizone Modelling Website, (www.bfrl.nist.gov/IAQanalysis/)
  5. CHAM – PHOENICS homepage. Pioneering CFD Software for Education & Industry, http://www.cham.co.uk/
  6. EMITS Project (“Environmental Monitoring of Integrated Transport Strategies- (EMITS)”, Oxford – United Kingdom LIFE95 ENV/UK/000595).Google Scholar
  7. Winkler, E.M. (1994) Stone in architecture – properties, durability. Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tim Yates
    • 1
  • Miloš Drdácký
    • 2
  • Stanislav Pospíšil
    • 2
  • Terje Grøntoft
    • 3
  1. 1.BRE-Building Research Establishment, Ltd.GarstonUK
  2. 2.Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics (ITAM)Czech Republic
  3. 3.NILU – Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Urban Environment and IndustryKjellerNorway

Personalised recommendations