Monitoring, Modelling and Mapping

  • Ron Hamilton
  • Helen Crabbe
  • Stephan Fitz
  • Terje Grøntoft

Chapter one discussed the role of air pollution in damaging our cultural heritage and showed that, in general, emissions have reduced but also that the pollution is changing in its nature with the evolution of a new pollutant environment. The dominance of SO2 pollution has fallen and traffic derived pollutants have increased, creating a new multi-pollutant situation.


European Union Geographic Information System Cultural Heritage PM10 Concentration European Environment Agency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We are grateful to Thomas Gauger for his contributions to this chapter, and in particular for the mapping studies which he undertook as part of the CULT-STRAT project. We would like to acknowledge the enormous contribution of Jan Henriksen, formerly of NILU, Norway. David Dajnak and Sean Beevers (Environment Research Group, King’s College London) also made valuable contributions with their studies on pollution and soiling maps for London.



  1. Aksu R, Horvath H, Kaller W, Lahounik S, Pesava P and Toprak S (1996) Measurements of the deposition velocity of particulate matter to building surfaces in the atmosphere. J. Aerosol. Sci. 27, S675–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Briggs DJ, Collins S, Pryl K, Smallbone K and van der Veen A (1997) Mapping urban air pollution using GIS: a regression-based approach. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 11(7), 699–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chock DP and Carmichael GR (2002) Atmospheric Modelling, Springer, ISBN 9780387954974.Google Scholar
  4. Cyrys J, Hochadel M, Gehring U, Hoek G, Diegmann V, Brunekreef B and Heinrich J (2005) GIS-based estimation of exposure to particulate matter and NO2 in an urban area: stochastic versus dispersion modelling. Environ. Health. Perspect. 113(7), 987–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. EIONET (2008) European Environment Information and Observation Network.
  6. EMEP (2008) Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution Steering Body to the Cooperative Programme for Monitoring and Evaluation of the Long-range Transmission of Air Pollutants in Europe.
  7. ERG (2008) Environment Research Group, King’s College London, 3-D map of air pollution in London.
  8. Ferm M, Watt J, O’Hanlon S, De Santis F and Varotsos C (2006) Deposition measurement of particulate matter in connection with corrosion studies. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 384, 1320–1330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Finstad A, Flugsrud K, Haakonsen G and Aasestad K (2004) Consumption of firewood, pattern of consumption and particulate matter. Oslo-Kongsvinger (SSB-rapport 2004/5) (available in Norwegian only).Google Scholar
  10. Foster F, Walker H, Duckworth G, Taylor A and Sugiyama G (1995). User’s guide to the CG-MATHEW/Adpic models, Version 3.0. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Report UCRL-MA-103581 Rev. 3).Google Scholar
  11. Goodchild MF, Steyaert LT, Parks BO, Johnston C, Maidment D, Crane M and Glendinning S, editors (1996) GIS and Environmental Modelling: Progress and Research Issues. Wiley, ISBN 978-0-470-23677-2.Google Scholar
  12. Lipfert FW (1989) Dry deposition velocity as an indicator for SO2 damage to materials. JAPCA 39, 446–452.Google Scholar
  13. Matt DR, McMillen RT, Womack JD and Hicks BB (1987) A comparison of estimated and measured SO2 deposition velocities. Water Air Soil Pollut. 36, 331–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McMahon TA and Denison PJ (1979) Empirical atmospheric deposition parameters – a survey. Atmos. Env. 13, 571–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nicholson KW (1988) The dry deposition of small particles: a review of experimental measurements. Atmos. Env. 22(12), 2653–2666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nicholson KW (1989) The deposition, resuspension and weathering of Chernobyl derived material in the UK. J. Radiol. Prot. 9(2), 113–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nuckols JR, Ward MH and Jarup L (2004). Using geographic information systems for exposure assessment in environmental epidemiology studies. Environ. Health. Perspect. 112(9), 1007–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Patnaik P (1997) Handbook of Environmental Analysis. Lewis, ISBN 9780873719896.Google Scholar
  19. Petersen WB (1980) User’s guide for Hiway-2: A highway air pollution model. Research Triangle Park, NC., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA-600/8-80-018).Google Scholar
  20. Reeve RN (2002) Introduction to Environmental Analysis, Wiley ISBN 9780471492955.Google Scholar
  21. Robinson R (2003) Atmospheric Monitoring Techniques. In Hewitt CN and Jackson A (editors), Handbook of Atmospheric Science. Wiley, ISBN 9780632052868.Google Scholar
  22. Sherman CA (1978) A mass consistent model for wind fields over complex terrain. J. Appl. Meteorol. 17, 312–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Slørdal LH, Walker SE and Solberg S (2003) The urban air dispersion model EPISODE applied in AirQUIS2003. Technical description. Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Kjeller (NILU TR 12/03).Google Scholar
  24. UK National Air Quality Information Archive (2008)
  25. Vawda Y (2003) Pollutant Dispersion Modelling. In Hewitt CN and Jackson A (editors), Handbook of Atmospheric Science. Wiley, ISBN 9780632052868.Google Scholar
  26. Vine MF, Degran D and Hanchette C (1997) Geographic information systems: their use in environmental epidemiological research, Environ. Health. Perspect. 105(6), 598–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sources of additional information

  1. US Environmental Protection Agency, Air Quality
  2. The London Air Quality Network, LAQN,
  3. THE EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENT, STATE AND OUTLOOK 2005 European Environment Agency, Kongens Nytorv 6,1050 Copenhagen K Denmark.
  4. European Topic Centre on Air and Climate Change

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ron Hamilton
    • 1
  • Helen Crabbe
    • 1
  • Stephan Fitz
    • 2
  • Terje Grøntoft
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre for Decision Analysis and Risk Management, School of Health and Social SciencesMiddlesex UniversityThe BurroughsUK
  2. 2.Umweltbundesamt06844 DessauGermany
  3. 3.NILU – Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Urban Environment and IndustryKjellerNorway

Personalised recommendations