Urban Water Recreation: Experiences, Place Meanings, and Future Issues

  • Ingrid E. Schneider

City sights … city smells … city sounds. In stark contrast to most urban images, water resources afford aesthetic relief among a variety of other individual and community benefits, including recreation. Water-based recreation experiences in urban environments contribute to citizen’s quality of life through opportunities for enhanced health and wellness, environmental protection, and stimulated economic development. Beyond the benefits afforded through recreation experiences, however, are the meanings urban dwellers and visitors attach to these recreation resources. Both the recreation experiences and the meanings attached to these recreation environments have short- and long-term implications for water resource managers, policy makers, and urban planners. These urban water-based recreation experiences and resources, their place meanings, and future issues associated with them are the subject of this chapter.


Urban Water Place Attachment Sustainable Tourism Outdoor Recreation Heritage Tourism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Anderson, D., I.E. Schneider, S. Wilhelm, and J. Leahy. 2008. Proximate and distant visitors: Differences in importance ratings of beneficial experiences. Journal of Park & Recreation Administration 26(4):47–65. Google Scholar
  2. Brown, P.J. 1984. Benefits of outdoor recreation and some ideas for valuing recreation opportunities. In: G.L. Peterson and A. Randall (eds.). Valuation of wildland resource benefits, pp. 209–220. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Google Scholar
  3. Budruk, M., S. Wilhelm, I.E. Schneider, and J. Heisey. 2008. Crowding and experience use history: A study of the moderating effect of place attachment among water-based recreationists. Environmental Management 41:528–537. Google Scholar
  4. Caltabiano, M.L. 1994. Measuring the similarity among leisure activities based on a perceived stress-reduction benefit. Leisure Studies 13:17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. CDC. 2001. Physical activity trends: 1990–1998. Centers for Disease Control, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 50:166–169.Google Scholar
  6. Center for City Park Excellence. 2007. City park facts. Trust for Public Lands.
  7. Coleman, D., and S.E. Iso-Ahola. 1993. Leisure and health: The role of social support and self-determination. Journal of Leisure Research 25:111–128.Google Scholar
  8. Cordell, H.K. 2000. National survey on recreation and the environment. Summary report #1. USDA Forest Service & NOAA, Washington, DC,
  9. Driver, B.L., D. Dustin, T. Baltic, G. Elsner, and G.L. Peterson. (eds.). 1996. Nature and the Human Spirit: Overview. Nature and the Human Spirit: Toward an Expanded Land Management Ethic. Venture Publishing, Inc., State College, PA.Google Scholar
  10. Ewing, R., T. Schmid, R. Killingsworth, A. Zlot, and S. Raudenbush, S. 2003. Relationship between urban sprawl and physical activity, obesity, and morbidity. American Journal of Health Promotion 18:47–57.Google Scholar
  11. Floyd, M. F., and L. Nicholas. 2008. Trends and research on race, ethnicity, and leisure: Implications for management. In M.T. Allison and I.E. Schneider (Eds). Diversity in the recreation profession: Organizational perspectives (revised ed.). pp. 189–209. State College, PA: Venture Publishing. Google Scholar
  12. Floyd, D.W., R. Germain, and K. Ter Horst. 1996. A Model for assessing negotiations and mediation in forest resource conflicts. Journal of Forestry 29–33.Google Scholar
  13. Frey, W.H. 2006. Diversity spreads out: metropolitan shifts in Hispanic, Asian, and black populations since 2000. Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  14. Goines, L., and L. Hagler. 2007. Noise pollution: A modern plague. Southern Medical Journal 100:287–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hammitt, W.E., and I.E. Schneider. 2000. Recreation conflict management, pp. 347–356. In: W.C. Gartner and D.W. Lime (eds.). Trends in Outdoor Recreation Leisure and Tourism. CABI Publishing, NewYork.Google Scholar
  16. Hedley, A.A., C.L. Ogden, C.L. Johnson, M.D. Carroll, L.R.Curtin, and K.M. Flegal. 2004. Overweight and obesity among US children, adolescents, and adults, 1999–2002. Journal of the American Medical Association 291:2847–2850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Humpel, N., N. Owen, and E. Leslie. 2002. Environmental factors associated with adults participation in physical activity: A review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 22: 188–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Iwasaki, Y., and R.C. Mannell. 2000. Hierarchical dimensions of leisure stress coping. Leisure Sciences 22:163–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Iwasaki, Y., and B.J.A. Smale. 1998. Longitudinal analyses of the relationships among life transitions, chronic health problems, leisure, and psychological well-being. Leisure Sciences 20: 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lindsey, G., J. Man, S. Payton, and K. Dickson. 2004. Property values, recreation values and urban greenways. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 22:69–90.Google Scholar
  21. Little, W. and F.P. Noe. 1984. A highly condensed description of the thought process used in developing visitor research for southeast parks. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Southeast Regional Office, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  22. Manning, R.E. 1999. Studies in outdoor recreation: Search and research for satisfaction. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, OR, 374 pp.Google Scholar
  23. Moore, R.L. and B.L. Driver. 2005. Introduction to outdoor recreation: providing and managing natural resource based opportunities. Venture Publishing, Inc., State College, PA.Google Scholar
  24. National Association of State Park Directors (2004) State Park Facts. accessed November 24, 2007
  25. NSRE. 2000–2002. National survey on recreation and the environment. The Interagency National Survey Consortium, Coordinated by the USDA Forest Service, Recreation, Wilderness, and Demographics Trends Research Group, Athens, GA and the Human Dimensions Research Laboratory, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.Google Scholar
  26. Nicholls, S., C. Vogt, and S.H. Jun. 2004. Heeding the call for heritage tourism. Parks and Recreation, 36–49.Google Scholar
  27. Proshansky, H.M. 1978. The city and self-identity. Environment and Behavior 10:147–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Relph, E. 1976. Place and placelessness. Pion Limited, London, 156 pp.Google Scholar
  29. Roggenbuck, J.W., R.J. Loomis, and J.V. Dagostino. 1991. The learning benefits of leisure. In: B.L. Driver, P.J. Brown, and G.L. Peterson (eds.). Benefits of Leisure, Venture Publishing, Inc., State College, PA.Google Scholar
  30. Roper ASW. 2004. Outdoor recreation in America 2003: Recreation’s benefits to society challenged by trends. Prepared for: The Recreation Roundtable. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  31. Sallis, J.F., A. Bauman, and M. Pratt. 1998. Environmental and policy interventions to promote physical activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 15:379–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sasidharan, V., F. Willits, and G. Godbey. 2005. Cultural differences in urban recreation patterns: an examination of park usage and activity participation across six population sub-groups. Managing Leisure 10:19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shafer, C.S., B.K. Lee, and S. Turner. 2000 A tale of three greenway trails: user perceptions related to quality of life. Landscape and Urban Planning 49:63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stein, T.V., D.H. Anderson, and D. Thompson. 1999. Identifying and managing for community benefits in Minnesota State Parks. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 17:1–19.Google Scholar
  35. Stokols, D., and S.A. Shumaker. 1981. People in places: A transactional view of settings. In: J. Harvey (ed.). Cognition, Social Behavior, and the Environment, pp. 441–488. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  36. Travel Industry of America. 2003. The Historic/Cultural Traveler, 2003 ed. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  37. Travelers Digest. 2007. Accessed November 24, 2007.
  38. Ulrich, R.S., U. Dimberg, and B.L. Driver. 1990. Psychophysiological indicators of leisure consequences. Journal of Leisure Research 22:154–166.Google Scholar
  39. USFWS. 2007. 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife Associated Recreation. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, US Department of the Interior, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  40. US Census Bureau. 2006. Nation’s population one-third minority. US Census Press Release. Retrieved January 21, 2007, from
  41. Warzecha, C.A., and D.W. Lime. 2001. Place attachment in Canyonlands National Park: Visitors’ Assessment of setting attributes on the Colorado and Green Rivers. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 19:59–78.Google Scholar
  42. Williams, D.R., and J.J. Vaske. 2003. The measurement of place attachment: Validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach. Forest Science 49:830–840.Google Scholar
  43. Williams, D.R. 2008. Pluralities of place: A user’s guide to place concepts, theories and philosophies in natural resource management. In: Kruger, L.E., Hall, T.E., Stiefel, M.C., tech. (eds.).  Understanding Concepts of Place in Recreation Research and Management.   Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-744. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, p. 204.Google Scholar
  44. WHO. 2007. World Health Organization, About WHO, 2007. Accessed May 15, 2007.
  45. WTO. 1996. What tourism managers need to know: a practical guide to the development and use of indicators of sustainable tourism. World Tourism Organization.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MinnesotaMinneapolis and Saint PaulUSA

Personalised recommendations