Advertisement

Demand Management, Privatization, Water Markets, and Efficient Water Allocation in Our Cities

  • K. William Easter
Chapter

When water is plentiful, we tend to take it for granted and overuse it. Once water becomes scarce, our neglect changes to pleas for new supplies. In other words, when water demands exceed the supply at existing low prices, shortages emerge and we appeal for an increase in supply. Yet expanding domestic water supplies has become much more difficult and expensive. This is because we have already developed the low cost sources of supply and face growing environmental constraints due, in part, to our increased awareness of the many instream services undeveloped water resources provide. The cost of developing new sources includes both the explicit financial cost of infrastructure and the opportunity cost of using water consumptively, rather than for instream or nonconsumptive services. Although nonconsumptive uses, by definition, do not involve water consumption, they can change the timing and location of water flows (hydropower), increase water temperature (cooling), or pollute (boating) the water. In addition, these instream (or nonconsumptive services) such as sewage dilution, recreation, and a healthy aquatic habitat may require increased water supplies. Balancing all these demands is a challenge and requires us to recognize that our supplies of clean, fresh water resources are quite limited. Simply increasing the supply is no longer the easy option. We must now emphasize using the water we have more wisely.

Keywords

Nonpoint Source Water User Private Firm Urban Water Water Utility 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Larry Baker and Frances Homans for their very helpful comments on an earlier draft of this chapter.

References

  1. Beecher, Janice, Richard G. Dreese and John P. Stanford. Regulatory Implications of Water and Waste Water Utility Privatization. Columbus, Ohio: National Regulatory Research Institute, 1995. Google Scholar
  2. Brewer, Jedidiah, Robert Glennon, Alan Ker and Gary Libecap. “2006 Presidential Address, Water Markets in the West: Prices, Trading and Contractual Forms.” Economic Inquiry 46(2)(April 2008):91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Callahan, Neil V. 2000. “Once Monopolistic Water Utilities Are Becoming Competitive: Is Yours?” Water Online wysiwyg://211/http.www.wateronline.com
  4. Colby, Connie C. and Katharine L. Jacobs.Arizona Water Policy, Management Innovations in an Urbanizing Arid Region. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, 2007.Google Scholar
  5. Dosi, Cesare and K. William Easter. “Water Scarcity: Market Failure and the Implications for Markets and Privatization.” International Journal of Public Administration 26(3)(2003): 265–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Easter, K. William, Mark W. Rosegrant and Ariel Dinar, eds. Markets for Water: Potential and Performance. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.Google Scholar
  7. Easter, K. William and Yang Liu. “Who Pays for Irrigation: Cost Recovery and Water Pricing.” Water Policy 9(2007):285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fang, Feng, P. L. Brezonik and K. William Easter. “Point-Nonpoint Source Water Quality Trading: A Case Study in the Minnesota River.” Journal of American Water Resources Association (June 2005):645–658.Google Scholar
  9. Haddad, Brent M. “Economic Incentive for Water Conservation on the Monterey Peninsula: The Market Proposal.” Journal of the American Water Resources Association 36(1)(2000):1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hall, Darwin. “Public Choice and Water Rate Design.” In The Political Economy of Water Pricing Reforms, ed. by Ariel Dinar. Published by Oxford University Press for World Bank, 2000, pp. 191–206.Google Scholar
  11. Hall, Lynda and Eric Raffini. “Water Quality Trading: Where Do We Go from Here?”Natural Resources and Environment 20(summer)(2005):38–42.Google Scholar
  12. Jacobs, Jeffrey W. and Charles W. Howe. “Key Issues and Experience in U.S. Water Services Privatization.” Water Resources Development 21(1)(2005):89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Renwick, Mary E. and Richard D. Green. Do Residential Water Demand Side Management Policies Measure Up? An Analysis of Eight California Water Agencies.”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 40(1)(2000):37–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Renwick, Mary E. and Sandra O. Archibald. “Demand Side Management Policies of Residential Water Use: Who Bears the Conservation Burden?” Land Economics 74(1998):343–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Siedenstat, Paul, Michael Nadal and Simon Ha Kim.America’s Water and Wastewater Industries: From Regulation to Privatization. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.Google Scholar
  16. Wolff, Gary and Eric Hallstein. Beyond Privatization: Restructuring Water Systems to Improve Performance. Pacific Institute, 2005.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. William Easter
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MinnesotaMinneapolis and Saint PaulUSA

Personalised recommendations