Institutional Structures for Water Management in the Eastern United States

  • Cliff Aichinger

Cities are faced with numerous and difficult tasks related to the management, treatment and disposal of water. Institutional structures (agencies, organizations, utilities, and departments) are needed to address these water issues. The choice of institutional arrangement is varied across the country and affected by local factors such as politics, history, geography, resources, water management issues and individuals involved in water issues.


Watershed Management Stormwater Management Colorado River Basin Watershed Group Watershed Approach 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Cobourn, J. 1999. Integrated Watershed Management on the Truckee River in Nevada. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 35:623–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. CTIC. 2007 Know Your Watershed Web Site, Conservation Technology Information Center Purdue University, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.
  3. Goldstein, J. and A. Huber-Lee. 2004. Global Lessons for Watershed Management in the United States. Water Environment Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA. Project number 00-WSM-5.Google Scholar
  4. Kenney, D.S. 1999. Historical and Sociopolitical context of the Western Watersheds Movement. JAWRA. 35(3). Google Scholar
  5. Lubell, M., M. Schneider, J. T. Scholz, and M. Mete. 2002. Watershed Partnerships and the Emergence of Collective Action Institutions. Am. J. Political Sci. 46:148–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Minnesota Planning. 2002. Charting a Course for the Future: Report of the State Water Program Reorganization Project. Minnesota Planning, St. Paul.Google Scholar
  7. Mullen, M. and B. Allison. 1999. Stakeholder Involvement and Social Capital: Keys to Watershed Management Success in Alabama. JAWRA. 35(3).Google Scholar
  8. NPCC. 2002. Watershed Solutions: Collaborative Problem Solving for States and Communities. National Policy Consensus Center, Portland, OR.Google Scholar
  9. NRC. 2007. Mississippi River Water Quality and the Clean Water Act: Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities. Committee on the Mississippi River and the Clean Water Act, National Research Council, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  10. NRC. 1999. New Strategies for America’s Watersheds.. Committee on Watershed Management, National Research Council Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  11. Walesh S. G. 1999. Dad Is Out, Pop Is In. J. Am Water Resources Assoc. 35:535–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Webster. 1994. Merriam Webster Collegiate Dictionary. Merriam-Webster, Inc., Springfield, MA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cliff Aichinger
    • 1
  1. 1.Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed DistrictSt. Paul, MinnesotaUSA

Personalised recommendations