• Lawrence A. Baker

Few of us, even among professionals who think about specific aspects of water every day, have ever thought about the “water environment of cities”. What does this mean, and why is it important? Some aspects may be familiar, whereas others are out of sight, and others are conceptual constructs. Parts of the urban water environment are obvious. Water features are often the heart and soul of many cities. Chicago’s Lake Michigan shoreline, the Chain of Lakes park system and the Mississippi riverfront in Minneapolis (Fig. 1.1), and Boston’s “Emerald Necklace” define these cities and make them uniquely livable. These water features renew the soul.


Urban Water Impervious Surface Water Footprint Urban Stream Urban Stormwater 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Development of this chapter was supported by NSF Grant 0739952.


  1. Boone, C. G. 2003. Obstacles to infrastructure provision: the struggle to build comprehensive sewer works in Baltimore. Historical Geography 31:151–168.Google Scholar
  2. Booth, D., D. Hartley, and R. Jackson. 2002. Forest cover, impervious-surface area, and the mitigation of stormwater impacts. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 38:835–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyer, T., and S. Polaksy. 2004. Valuing urban wetlands: a review of non-market economic studies. Wetlands 24:744–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Browne, A. 2000. Beijing scoops the last ladles of nightsoil. Reuters News Service, December 23, 2000.Google Scholar
  5. CBO. 2002. Future Investment in Drinking Water and Wastewater Infrastructure. Congressional Budget Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  6. Chandler, T. 1987. Four Thousand Years of Urban Growth: An Historical Census. Edwin Mellen.Google Scholar
  7. Cronan, W. 1991. Nature's Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West. W.W. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Culter, D., and G. Miller. 2005. The role of public health improvements in health advances: the twentieth century United States. Demograpy 42:1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Freese, B. 2003. Coal: A Human History. Penguin Books, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Halliday. 2001. The Great Stink of Paris and the Nineteenth-Century Struggle Against Filth and Germs. Stroud Publisher, Sutton, England.Google Scholar
  11. Konrad, C. P. 2003. Effects of Urban Development on Floods. U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 076-03. U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  12. Marshall, R. 2001. Waterfronts in Post-Industrial Cities. Spoon Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. McHarg, I. 1971. Design with Nature. The American Museum of Natural History, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Ogle, M. 1999. Water supply, waste disposal and culture of privatism in the mid-nineteenth century. J. Urban History 25:321–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Reisner, M. 1993. Cadillac Desert. Viking Penguin, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Smil, V. 1994. Energy in World History. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  17. Smil, V. 2001. Enriching the Earth: Fritz Haber, Carl Bosch and the Transformation of World Food Production. MIT Press, Boston.Google Scholar
  18. Tarr, J. A. 1996. The Search for the Ultimate Sink: Urban Pollution in Historical Perspective. University of Akron Press, Akron, OH.Google Scholar
  19. U.N. 1987. Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment, United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development, New York.Google Scholar
  20. U.N. 2006. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2005 Revision. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Ulrich, R. S. 1993. Biophilia, biophobia and natural landscapes. In S. E. Kellert and E. O. Wilson, editors. Biophilia, Biophobia, and Natural Landscapes. Island Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  22. USEPA. 2000. Progress in Water Quality: An Evaluation of the National Investment in Municipal Wastewater Treatment. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Minnesota Water Resources Center, University of Minnesota, and WaterThink, LLC, St. PaulUSA

Personalised recommendations