Advertisement

Evaluating Cyclic Fatigue of Sealants During Outdoor Testing

  • R. Sam Williams
  • Steve Lacher
  • Corey Halpin
  • Christopher White

Keywords

Annual Book Outdoor Exposure Cyclic Fatigue Cyclic Movement Forest Product Laboratory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Referencse

  1. (1).
    White, C.C., Martin, J., Weber, S., Shultz, L., and Williams, R.S., “Reliability-Based Method for Service Life Prediction of Materials,” Proc. SPE/ANTEC National Meeting, 2002.Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    White, C.C., Hunston, D.L., and Williams, R.S., “Challenges in Characterizing Sealant,” Proc. ANTEC Conference from Society of Plastics Engineering, Nashville, TN, 2003.Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    White, C., Embree, N., Buch, C., and Williams, R.S., “Design, Development, and Testing of a Hybrid in situ Testing Device for Building Joint Sealant,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., 76, 045111 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    White, C.C. and Hunston, D.L, “Issues Related to the Mechanical Property Characterization of Sealants,” Durability of Building and Construction Sealants and Adhesives, ASTM Special Technical Publication 1453, p. 325-334, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    Williams, R.S., Sanandi, A., Halpin, C., and White, C., “Merging Weather Data with Materials Response Data during Outdoor Exposure,” Proc. Third International Woodcoatings Congress, The Hague, The Netherlands, 2002.Google Scholar
  6. (6).
    Williams R.S., Lacher, S., Halpin, C., and White, C., “Development of Test Apparatus for Service Life Prediction of Sealant Formulations and Evaluation of Data from 18 Months of Outdoor Weathering,” Proc. Fourth International Woodcoatings Congress, The Hague, The Netherlands, 2004.Google Scholar
  7. (7).
    Williams, R.S., Lacher, L., Halpin, C., and White, C., “Evaluating Weather Factors and Material Response during Outdoor Exposure to Determine Accelerated Test Protocols for Predicting Service Life,” in Service Life Prediction: Challenging the Status Quo, Martin, J.W., Ryntz, R.A., and Dickie, R.A. (Eds.), Federation of Societies for Coatings Technology, Blue Bell, PA,p. 171-185, 2005.Google Scholar
  8. (8).
    Williams, R.S., Lacher, S., Halpin, C., and White, C., “Evaluation of Materials During Outdoor Testing Using a Computer-Controlled Test Apparatus,” Proc. Fifth International Woodcoatings Congress, Prague, Czech Republic, 2006.Google Scholar
  9. (9).
    Martin, J.W. and Bauer, D.R. (Eds.), Service Life Prediction: Methodology and Metrologies, American Chemical Society Series 805, Oxford Press, New York, 2001.Google Scholar
  10. (10).
    D 822 96, Standard Practice of Conducting Tests on Paint and Related Coatings and Materials using Filtered Open-Flame Carbon-Arc Light and Water Exposure Apparatus, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 04.07, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2000.Google Scholar
  11. (11).
    D 5031 96, Standard Practice of Conducting Tests on Paint and Related Coatings and Materials using Enclosed Carbon-Arc Light and Water Exposure Apparatus, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 06.01, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2001.Google Scholar
  12. (12).
    G 26 96, Standard Practice for Operating Light-Exposure Apparatus (Xenon-Arc) With and Without Water for Exposure of Nonmetallic Materials, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 06.01, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2001.Google Scholar
  13. (13).
    G 53 96, Standard Practice for Operating Light- and Water-Exposure Apparatus (Fluorescent UVCondensing Type) for Exposure of Nonmetallic Materials, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 06.01, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2001.Google Scholar
  14. (14).
    D 4587 91, Standard Practice of Conducting Tests on Paint and Related Coatings and Materials using a Fluorescent UV-Condensation Light- and Water-Exposure Apparatus, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 06.01, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2001.Google Scholar
  15. (15).
    Martin, J.W., “ A Critical Review of the Role of Field-Exposure Experiments in Predicting the Service Life of Coatings,” Plastics and Coatings Durability, Stabilization, Testing, Ryntz, R.A. (Ed.), Ch. 2. Hanser Gardner Publications, Inc., Cincinnati, OH,p. 33, 2001.Google Scholar
  16. (16).
    Martin, J.W., “Repeatability and Repeatability of Field Exposure Results,” Service Life Prediction Methodologies and Metrologies, Martin, J.W. and Bauer, D.R. (Eds.), ACS Symposium Series 805, American Chemical Society, Oxford Press, NY, p. 1, 2001.Google Scholar
  17. (17).
    Nguyen, T., Rezig, A., Gu, X., Kidah, B., and Martin, J.W., “Degradation Kinetics and Mechanisms of Aliphatic Amine-Cured Epoxy Coatings Exposed to Xenon Arc UV and Outdoors,” Proc. Western Coatings Conference, Las Vegas, NV, 2005.Google Scholar
  18. (18).
    C 1442 99, Standard Practice for Conducting Tests on Sealants using Artificial Weathering Apparatus, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 04.07, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2000.Google Scholar
  19. (19).
    C 718 93, Standard Test Method for Ultraviolet (UV)-Cold Box Exposure of One-Part, Elastomeric, Solvent-Release Type Sealants, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 04.07, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2000.Google Scholar
  20. (20).
    C 732 95, Standard Test Method for Aging Effects of Artificial Weathering on Latex Sealants, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 04.07, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2000.Google Scholar
  21. (21).
    C 734 93, Standard Test Method for Low-Temperature Flexibility of Latex Sealants After Artificial Weathering, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 04.07, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2000.Google Scholar
  22. (22).
    C 793 97, Standard Test Method for Effects of Accelerated Weathering on Elastomeric Joint Sealants, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 04.07, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2000.Google Scholar
  23. (23).
    C 1257 94, Standard Test Method for Accelerated Weathering of Solvent-Release-Type Sealants, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 04.07, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2000.Google Scholar
  24. (24).
    D 2249 94, Standard Test Method for Predicting Effect of Weathering on Face Glazing and Bedding Compounds on Metal Sash, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 04.07, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2000.Google Scholar
  25. (25).
    ASTM C 719 93, Standard Test Method for Adhesion and Cohesion of Elastomeric Joint Sealants Under Cyclic Movement (Hockman Cycle), 2005.Google Scholar
  26. (26).
    Onuoha, U.O., “Durability of One-Part Polyurethane and Polyurethane Hybrid Sealants,” Durability of Building Sealants, Wolf, A.T. (Ed.), RILEM Pub., France, p. 235–251, 1999.Google Scholar
  27. (27).
    Brown, N.G., “Assessment of Joint Sealant by Outdoor Exposure in Cyclic Movement Testers,” Report No. 01.1-2, CSIRO Division of Building Research, Highett, Victoria, Australia, p. 16-22, 1965.Google Scholar
  28. (28).
    Burstrom, P.G., “Durability and Ageing of Sealants,” In Durability of Building Materials and Components, ASTM STP 691, Sereda, P.J. and Litvan, G.G. (Eds.), ASTM Pub., Philadelphia, PA, p. 643–657, 1980.Google Scholar
  29. (29).
    Karpati, K.K., Solvason, M.R., and Sereda,, P.J., “Weathering Rack for Sealants,” J. Coat. Technol., 49, No. 626, p. 44–47 (1977).Google Scholar
  30. (30).
    Karpati, K.K., “Device for Weathering Sealants Undergoing Cyclic Movements,” J. Coat. Technol., 50, No. 641, p. 27–30 (1978).Google Scholar
  31. (31).
    Lacasse, M.A., “Advances in Test Methods to Assess the Long Term Performance of Sealants,” Science and Technology of Building Seals, Sealants, Glazing and Waterproofing, Myers, J.C. (Ed.), Vol. III, ASTM STP 1254, ASTM International, Philadelphia, PA, 1994.Google Scholar
  32. (32).
    Lacasse, M.A., Giffin, G.B., and Margeson, J.C., “Evaluation of Cyclic Fatigue as a Means of Assessing the Performance of Construction Joint Sealants,” ASTM Special Technical Publication, n, 1271, Science and Technology of Building Seals, Sealants, Glazing, and Waterproofing, ASTM International, Philadelphia, PA, 1996; Proc. 5th Symposium on the Science and Technology of Building Seals, Sealants, Glazing, and Waterproofing, Phoenix, AZ, Vol. 5, p, 266-281, 1995.Google Scholar
  33. (33).
    Lacasse, M.A., Giffin, G.B., and Margeson, J.C., “Laboratory Cyclic Fatigue Test of Silicone Sealant Mini-Specimens, “ASTM Special Technical Publication, n. 1334, Proc. 7th Symposium on the Science and Technology of Building Seals, Sealants, Glazing, and Waterproofing, San Diego, CA, p. 51-65, 1998.Google Scholar
  34. (34).
    Lacasse, M.A. and Margeson, J.C., “Movement during Cure of Latex Building Joint Sealants,” Proc. 6th Annual Symposium on the Science and Technology of Building Seals, Sealants, Glazing, and Waterproofing, Fort Lauderdale, FL, Vol. 6, p. 129–145, 1999.Google Scholar
  35. (35).
    Bolte, H., Boettger, T., and Wolf, A.T., “Preliminary Report on the Ageing Behavior of Sealants Exposed to Dynamic Natural and Artificial Weathering,” RILEM Proceedings PRO 10 Durability of Building and Construction Sealants, p. 151–172, 2000.Google Scholar
  36. (36).
    Liu, X-X, and Wang, S.T., “Joint Sealant Fatigue Property of Airport Concrete Pavement,” J. Traffic Transport. Engineering, 6 (1), 44–47 (2006).Google Scholar
  37. (37).
    Al-Qadi, I.L., Abo-Qudais, S., and Khuri, R.E., “Method to Evaluate Rigid-Pavement Joint Sealant under Cyclic Shear and Constant Horizontal Deflection,” Transport. Res. Rec., 1680, p. 30–35 (1999).Google Scholar
  38. (38).
    Al-Qadi, I.L., and Abo-Qudais, S., ASTM Special Technical Publication, n. 1254, pt 3; Proc. 3rd Symposium on the Science and Technology of Building Seals and Sealants, Fort Myers, FL, p. 85–94, 1993.Google Scholar
  39. (39).
    Miyauchi, H., Enomoto, N., Sugiyama, S., and Tanaka, K., “Artificial Weathering and Cyclic Movement Test bResults Based on the RILEM TC 139-DBS Durability Test Method for Construction Sealants,” ASTM Special Technical Publication, n 1453, Durability of Building and Construction Sealants and Adhesives, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, p. 206–212, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. (40).
    Sharman, W.R., Fry, J.I., and Whitney, R.S., “Six Years Natural Weathering of Sealants,” Durability of Building Materials, 2 (1), 79-90 (1983).Google Scholar
  41. (41).
    Koike, M., Tanaka, K., and Oda, S-I., “Dynamic Properties of Polysulfide and Silicone Sealants in Cyclic Tests of Longer Periods,” Report of the Research Laboratory of Engineering Materials, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 7, 159-165 (1982).Google Scholar
  42. (42).
    Marechal, J.C., and Kalifa, P., “The Prediction of Long-Term Sealant Performance from Dynamic Accelerated Weathering,” Durability of Building Materials and Components 7, Proc. International Conference on Durability of Building Materials and Components, 7th, Stockholm, p. 54–64, 1996.Google Scholar
  43. (43).
    Beech, J.C., “Test Methods for the Movement Capability of Building Sealants: The State of the Art, Materials and Structures, 18 (108), 473–482 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. (44).
    Wolf, A.T., “Aging Resistance of Building and Construction Sealants, Part 1,” RILEM Proc. Durability of Building Sealants, p. 63–89 (1996).Google Scholar
  45. (45).
    Wolf, A.T., “Attempts at Correlating Accelerated Laboratory and Natural Outdoor Ageing Results,” Durability of Building Sealants, Wolf, A.T. (Ed.), RILEM Pub., France. p. 181–201, 1999.Google Scholar
  46. (46).
    Wolf, A.T. and Seneffe, B., “Development of RILEM Durability Test Methods for Curtainwall Sealants,” Proc. International Conference on Durability of Building Materials and Components, 9, Brisbane, Australia, p. 105/1-105/9, 2002.Google Scholar
  47. (47).
    Lacher, S., Williams, R.S., Halpin C., and White C., “Development of a Powered Outdoor Sealant Fatigue Test Apparatus,” In: Service Life Prediction, Challenging the Status Quo, Martin, J.W., Ryntz, R.A., and Dickie, R.A. (Eds.), Federation of Societies for Coatings Technology, Blue Bell, PA, p. 207–216, 2005.Google Scholar
  48. (48).
    Hunston, D.L., White, C.C., and Williams, R.S., “Viscoelastic Characterization of Sealant Materials,” Proc. 26th Annual Meeting Adhesion Society, Myrtle Beach, SC, 2003.Google Scholar
  49. (49).
    Hunston, D.L., White, C.C., and Williams R.S., “Mechanical Behavior of Caulks and Sealants,” Proc. 225th ACS National Meeting, New Orleans, LA, 2003.Google Scholar
  50. (50).
    Abraham, F., Alshuth, T., Jerrams, S., “The Dependence on Mean Stress and Stress Amplitude of the Fatigue Life of Elastomers,” Deutsches Institut fur Kautschuktechnologie e. V. Publikation, 134, 2001.Google Scholar
  51. (51).
    Bergström, J.S. and Boyce, M.C., “Time-Dependence of Elastomeric Materials: Experiments and Modeling,” 10th International Conference on Deformation, Yield and Fracture of Polymers, Cambridge, UK, April 1997.Google Scholar
  52. (52).
    Bergström, J.S., “Constitutive Modeling of Elastomers—Accuracy of Predictions and Numerical Efficiency,” PolymerFEM.com, 2005.Google Scholar
  53. (53).
    Wilkinson, G.N. and Rogers, C.E., “Symbolic Descriptions of Factorial Models for Analysis of Variance,” Applied Statistics,22:392-9 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. (54).
    Chambers, J.M., “Linear Models,” Chapter 4 of Statistical Models in S, Chambers, J.M. and Hastie, T.J. (Eds.), Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole, 1992.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Sam Williams
    • 1
  • Steve Lacher
    • 1
  • Corey Halpin
    • 1
  • Christopher White
    • 2
  1. 1.U.S. Department of AgricultureForest Service Forest Products LaboratoryMadison
  2. 2.National Institute of Standards and TechnologyGaithersburg

Personalised recommendations