Protein Interactions at Material Surfaces

  • Janice L. McKenzie
  • Thomas J. Webster


It is important to note that while this chapter will emphasize protein interactions essential for mediating cell functions on implants, the same fundamental principles apply for any application in which proteins interact with surfaces. Applications in which a firm understanding of protein–surface interactions are needed include biomaterials, tissue engineering materials, implants, bioseparations, biosensors, biochips, food science, and aquatics (to only name a few).


Atomic Force Microscopy Focal Adhesion Protein Adsorption Globular Protein Biomaterial Surface 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Kasemo B. Biological surface science. Surf Sci, 2002, 500: 656–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berg JM, Tymoczko JL, and Stryer L. Biochemistry, W. H. Freeman and Company: New York, 2002.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Garrett RH and Grisham CM. Biochemistry, Saunders College Publishing: Fort Worth, 1999.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lodish H, Berk A, Zipursky LS, Matsudaira P, Baltimore D, and Darnell J. Molecular Cell Biology, W. H. Freeman and Company: New York, 2000.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Taylor WR and Aszodi A. Protein Geometry, Classification, Topology and Symmetry, Institute of Physics Publishing: Bristol, 2005.MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Horton HR, Moran LA, Ochs RS, Rawn JD, and Scrimgeour KG. Principles of Biochemistry, Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, 1996.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goh C-S, Lan N, Douglas SM, Wu B, Echols N, Smith A, Milburn D, Montelione GT, Zhao H, and Gerstein M. Mining the structural genomics pipeline: identification of protein properties that affect high-throughput experimental analysis. J Mol Biol, 2004, 336: 115–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Asherie N. Protein crystallization and phase diagrams. Methods, 2004, 34: 266–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pollack GH. Cells, Gels and the Engines of Life, Ebner and Sons Publishers: Seattle, Washington, 2001.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ling GN. The physical state of water in living cell and model systems, Ann NY Acad Sci, 1965, 125: 401–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ling GN. In Search of the Physical Basis of Life, Plenum Publ. Co.: New York, 1984.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zheng JM and Pollack GH. Long range forces extending from polymer surfaces. Phys Rev E, 2003, 68: 1–7.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Takhistov P. Electrochemical synthesis and impedance characterization of nano-patterned biosensor substrate. Biosens Bioelectron, 2004, 19: 1445–1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang J, Chia Q, Albrecht T, Kuznetsov AM, Grubb M, Hansen LG, Wackerbarth H, Welinder AC, and Ulstrup J. Electrochemistry and bioelectrochemistry towards the single-molecule level: theoretical notions and systems. Electrochim Acta, 2005, 50: 3143–3159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Webster TJ. Advances in Chemical Engineering, Academic Press: New York, 2001, pp. 125–166.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Keselowsky BG, Collard DM, and Garcia AJ. Surface chemistry modulates fibronectin conformation and directs integrin binding and specificity to control cell adhesion. J Biomed Mater, 2003, 66A: 247–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Keselowsky BG, Collard DM, and Garcia AJ. Surface chemistry modulates focal adhesion composition and signaling through changes in integrin binding. Biomaterials, 2004, 25: 5947–5954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Elimelech M and Childress AE. Reverse Osmosis Membranes: Implications for Membrane Performance, U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation: Denver, 1996.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Saltzman W. Cell Interactions with Polymers, in Lanza R, Langer R, and Vacanti J, eds. Principles of Tissue Engineering, Academic Press: San Diego, CA, 2000.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Michael KE, Vernekar VN, Keselowsky BG, Meredith JC, Latour RA, and García AJ. Adsorption-induced conformational changes in fibronectin due to interactions with well-defined surface chemistries. Langmuir, 2003, 19: 8033–8040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kowalczynska HM, Nowak-Wyrzykowska M, Dobkowski J, Kolos R, Kaminski J, Makowska-Cynka A, and Marciniak E. Adsorption characteristics of human plasma fibronectin in relationship to cell adhesion. J Biomed Mater Res, 2002, 61: 260–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shen M and Horbett TA. The effects of surface chemistry and adsorbed proteins on monocyte/macrophage adhesion to chemically modified polystyrene surfaces. Mater Res, 2001, 57: 336–345.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Frazier R, Davies M, Matthijs G, Roberts C, Schacht E, Tasker S, and Tendler S. The self-assembly and inhibition of protein adsorption by thiolated dextran monolayers at hydrophobic metal surfaces, in Ratner BD and Castner D, eds. Surface Modification of Polymeric Biomaterials, Plenum Press: New York, 1996, pp. 117–127.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chinn JA and Slack SM. Biomaterials: Protein-surface interactions, in Palsson B, Hubbell JA, Plonsey R, and Bronzino JD, eds. Tissue Engineering, CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2003, pp. 10-11–10-13.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Webster TJ, Schadler LS, Siegel RW, and Bizios R. Mechanisms of enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase alumina involve vitronectin. Biomaterials, 2001, 22: 291–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, Siegel RW, and Bizios R. Specific proteins mediate enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res, 2000, 51: 475–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Price RL, Gutwein LG, Kaledin L, Tepper F, and Webster TJ. Osteoblast function on nanophase alumina materials: Influence of chemistry, phase, and topography. J Biomed Mater Res, 2003, 67A: 1284–1293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Slack S and Horbett T. Changes in the state of fibrinogen adsorbed to solid surfaces: An explanation of the influence of surface chemistry on the Vroman effect. J Colloid Interface Sci, 1989, 133: 148–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fang F and Szleifer I. Kinetics and thermodynamics of protein adsorption: A generalized molecular theoretical approach. Biophys J, 2001, 80: 2568–2589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Legleiter J and Kowalewski T. Atomic force microscopy of B-amyloid, in Ricci PCBAD, ed. Atomic Force Microscopy Biomedical Methods and Applications, Humana Press Inc.: Totowa, NJ, 2004, pp. 349–364.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ayad S, Boot-Hanford R, Kadler K, and Shuttleworth A. The Extracellular Matrix Facts-Book, Academic Press: San Diego, CA, 1994.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Olsen B. Matrix molecules and their ligands, in Vacanti J, ed. Principles of Tissue Engineering, Academic Press: San Diego, CA, 2000.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, and Walter P. Molecular biology of the cell. Garland Sci, 2002.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bellail AC, Hunter SB, Brat DJ, Tan C, and Meir EGV. Microregional extracellular matrix heterogeneity in brain modulates glioma cell invasion. Int J Biochem Cell B, 2004, 36: 1046–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yurchenco PD and Wadsworth WG. Assembly and tissue functions of early embryonic laminins and netrins. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 2004, 16: 572–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yamada KM. Fibronectin and other cell interactive proteins, in Hay ED, ed. Cell Biology of Extracellular Matrix, Plenum Press: New York, 1991.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ruoslahti E. Integrins as receptors for extracellular matrix, in Hay ED, ed. Cell Biology of the Extracellular Matrix, Plenum Press: New York, 1991.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Toole BP. Proteoglycans and hyaluronan in morphogenesis and differentiation, in Hay ED, ed. Cell Biology of Extracellular Matrix, Plenum Press: New York, 1991, pp. 305–341.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Geiger B, Bershadsky A, Pankov R, and Yamada KM. Transmembrane extracellular matrix-cytoskeleton crosstalk. Nat Rev, 2001, 2: 793–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Flemming RG, Murphy CJ, Abrams GA, Goodman SL, and Nealey PF. Effects of synthetic micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior. Biomaterials, 1999, 20: 573–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Suh CW, Kim MY, Choo JB, Kim JK, Kim HK, and Lee EK. Analysis of protein adsorption characteristics to term-pore silica particles by using confocal laser scanning microscopy. J Biotechnol, 2004, 112: 267–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Alexander H, Brunski JB, Cooper SL, Hench LL, Hergenrother RW, Hoffman AS, Kohn J, Langer R, Peppas NA, Ratner BD, Shalaby SW, Visser SA, and Yannas IV. Classes of materials used in medicine, in Buddy Ratner AH, Schoen F, and Lemons J, eds. Biomaterials Science, Academic Press, Inc.: San Diego, CA, 1996, pp. 37–130.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    McKenzie J, Shi R, and Webster T. Material Design for Neural Applications Using Carbon Nanofibers, American Society for Metals International Conference Proceedings: St. Paul, MN, 2004.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    McKenzie J, Waid M, Shi R, and Webster T. Cytocompatibility of astrocytes on carbon nanofibers. Biomaterials, 2004, 55: 1309–1317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Webster T, Waid M, McKenzie J, Price R, and Ejiofor J. Nano-biotechnology: Carbon nanofibres as improved neural and orthopaedic implants. Nanotechnology, 2004, 15: 48–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janice L. McKenzie
    • 1
  • Thomas J. Webster
    • 2
  1. 1.Nanovis, Inc.West LafayetteUSA
  2. 2.Division of EngineeringBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA

Personalised recommendations