Meaningful Consideration of Competence to be Executed

  • Randy K. Otto


Mental Health Professional Response Style District Court Lower Court Formal Thought Disorder 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Atkins v. Virginia, 536 US 304 (2002).Google Scholar
  2. Barnard v. Collins, 13 F.3d 871 (5th Cir. 1994).Google Scholar
  3. Billiott v. State, 655 So.2d 1 (Miss. 1995).Google Scholar
  4. Bonnie, R. (2005). Mentally ill prisoners on death row: Unsolved puzzles for courts and legislatures. Catholic University Law Review, 54, 1169–1187.Google Scholar
  5. Brodsky, S. L., Zapf, P. A.,&Boccaccini, M. T. (1999, October). Post conviction relief: The assessment of competence for execution. Paper presented at Psychological Expertise and Criminal Justice: A conference for psychologists and lawyers jointly sponsored by the American Psychological Association and the Criminal Justice Section of the American Bar Association. Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
  6. Coe v. Bell, 209 F.3d 815 (6th Cir. 2000).Google Scholar
  7. Cunningham, M. D., & Vigen, M. P. (2002). Death row inmate characteristics, adjustment, and confinement: A critical review of the literature. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 20, 191–210.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fearance v. Scott, 56 F.3d 633 (5th Cir. 1995).Google Scholar
  9. Ford v. Wainright, 477 US 399 (1986).Google Scholar
  10. Garrett v. Collins, 951 F.2d 57 (5th Cir. 1992).Google Scholar
  11. Heilbrun, K., & McClaren, H. (1988). The assessment of competency for execution: An overview. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 5, 383–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lowenfield v. Butler, 843 F.2d 183 (5th Cir. 1987).Google Scholar
  13. Mello, M. (2007). Executing the mentally ill: When is someone sane enough to die? Criminal Justice, 22(3), 1–12.Google Scholar
  14. Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N., Slobogin, C., Lyons, P., & Otto, R. K. (2007). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professional and lawyers (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  15. Miller, K. S., & Radelet, M. S. (1993). Executing the mentally ill: The criminal justice system and the case of Alvin Ford. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Otto, R. K. (2008). Challenges and advances in assessment of response style. In R. Rogers. Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  17. Otto, R. K., Slobogin, C., & Greenberg, S. (2006). Utilizing and accessing third party information: Legal and ethical issues. In A. Goldstein (Ed.), Forensic psychology: Emerging topics and expanding roles (pp. 190–205). New York: John Wiley&SonsGoogle Scholar
  18. Small, M. A., & Otto, R. K. (1987). Evaluations of competency to be executed: Legal contours and implications for assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 18, 146–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Panetti v. Quarterman, 551 US; 127 S.Ct. 2842 (2007).Google Scholar
  20. Panetti v. Dretke, 448 F.3d 815 (2006).Google Scholar
  21. Rector v. Clark, 923 F.2d 570 (8th Cir. 1991).Google Scholar
  22. Rogers, R. (2008). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  23. Rogers, R., & Bender, S. D. (2003). Evaluation of malingering and deception. In A. M. Goldstein (Ed.), Forensic psychology (pp. 109–132). New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  24. Slobogin, C. (2007). The Supreme Court’s recent criminal mental health cases: Rulings of questionable competence. Criminal Justice, 22(3), 1–8.Google Scholar
  25. Van Tran v. State, 6 S.W.3d 257 (Supreme Court of Tennessee, 1999).Google Scholar
  26. Walter v. Angelone, 321 F.3d 422 (4th Cir. 2003).Google Scholar
  27. Walton v. Johnson, 306 F.Supp. 2d. 597 (W.D. Virginia, 2004).Google Scholar
  28. Walton v. Johnson, 407 F.3d 285 (Fourth Cir. 2005)Google Scholar
  29. Walton v. Johnson, 440 F.3d 160 (Fourth Cir. 2006).Google Scholar
  30. Whitmore v. Lockhart, 8. F.3d 614 (8th Cir. 1993).Google Scholar
  31. Zapf, P. A., Boccaccini, M. T., & Brodsky, S. L. (2002). Assessment of competency for execution: Professional guidelines and an evaluation checklist. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 21, 103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Randy K. Otto
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mental Health Law & PolicyFlorida Mental Health Institute University of South FloridaTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations