Constitutional Health Care and Incompetency to Face Execution

  • Michael R. Quattrocchi


Mental Health Condition Restorative Treatment Forensic Psychology Forensic Assessment Forced Treatment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ackerson, K. S., Brodsky, S. L., & Zapf, P. A. (2005). Judges’ and psychologists’ assessments of legal and clinical factors in competence for execution. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 164–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.), text revision. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  3. American Psychiatric Association (2000). Psychiatric services in jails and prisons: A task force report of the American Psychiatric Association (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  4. American Psychological Association, American Psychiatric Association, and National Alliance on Mental Illness (2007). Brief for Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioner. Panetti v. Quarterman (No. 06–6407). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  5. Balla v. Idaho State Board of Corrections, 595 F. Supp. 1558 (1984)Google Scholar
  6. Bonnie, R. J. (1990). Dilemmas in administering the death penalty: Conscientious abstention, professional ethics, and the needs of the legal system. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 67–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowring v. Godwin, 551 F. 2d 44 (1977).Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, F. (1998). The mentally disordered inmate and the law. Kingston, N.J: Civic Research Institute.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, F., & Gerbasi, J. B. (2005). Legal issues regarding the provision of mental health care in correctional settings. In C. L. Scott & J. B. Gerbasi (Eds.), Handbook of correctional mental health (pp. 259–283). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Committee on Ethical Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists (1991). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychologists [Electronic version]. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 655–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Committee on the Revision of the Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychology (2008). Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychology, Proposed Third Draft 2/27/08, retrieved May 4, 2008 from
  12. Cunningham, M. D. (2006). Informed consent in capital sentencing Evaluations: Targets and content. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 37, 452–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cunningham, M. D. & Vigen, M. P. (2002). Death row inmate characteristics, adjustment, and confinement: A critical review of the literature. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 20, 191–210.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U. S. 97 (1976).Google Scholar
  15. Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U. S. 825 (1994).Google Scholar
  16. Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U. S. 399 (1986).Google Scholar
  17. Gannon, J. (February 2005). Mental health in corrections: The continuing Dilemma [Electronic version]. Corrections Today, 2 pages.Google Scholar
  18. Grubbs v. Bradley, 552 F. Supp. 1052 (1982).Google Scholar
  19. Heilbrun, K. S. (1987). The assessment of competency for execution: An overview. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 5, 383–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heilbrun, K. S., & McClaren, H. A. (1988). Assessment of competency for Execution? A guide for mental health professionals. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 16, 205–216.Google Scholar
  21. Heilbrun, K., Radelet, M. L., & Dvoskin, J. (1992). The debate on treating individuals incompetent for execution. American Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 596–605.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Human Rights Watch. (2003). Ill-equipped: U.S. prisons and offenders with mental illness. New York: Author.Google Scholar
  23. Knapp, S., & VandeCreek, L. (2001). Ethical issues in personality assessment in forensic psychology [Electronic version]. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77, 242–254.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Langley v. Coughlin, 715 F.Supp. 522 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)Google Scholar
  25. Latzer, B. (2003). Between madness and death: The medicate-to-execute controversy. Criminal Justice Ethics, Summer/Fall, 3–14.Google Scholar
  26. Maue, F. R. (July 2006). Management of the mentally ill in administrative segregation: Legal and management challenges. Corrections Today, 46–50.Google Scholar
  27. McGuckin v. Smith, 974 F. 2d 1050 (1992).Google Scholar
  28. Metzner, J. L., Cohen, F., Grossman, L. S., & Wettstein, R. M. (1998). Treatment in jails and prisons. In R. H. Wettstein (Ed.), Treatment of offenders with mental disorders (pp. 211–264). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  29. Mushlin, M. B. (2002). Rights of prisoners: Third edition. (Vol. 1).Google Scholar
  30. Thomson West. National Commission on Correctional Health Care (NCCHC, 2003). Standards for health services in prisons. Chicago: AuthorGoogle Scholar
  31. New Mexico Corrections Department Policy, (Revised 01/30/08). Outpatient Mental Health Treatment, Retrieved May 17, 2008 from
  32. Panetti v. Quarterman, 127 S.Ct. 2842 (2007).Posner, M. J. (1992). The Estelle medical professional judgment standard: The right of those in state custody to receive high-cost medical treatments. American Journal of Law and Medicine, XVIII, 347–368.Google Scholar
  33. Singleton v. Norris, 319 F.3d 1018 (8th Cir. 2003) [Electronic version].Google Scholar
  34. Small, M. A., & Otto, R. K. (1991). Evaluations of competency to be executed: Legal contours and implications for assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 18, 146–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. State v. Perry (1992), 610 So.2d 746.Google Scholar
  36. Ward, B. A. (1986). Competency for execution: Problems in law and Psychiatry. Florida State University Law Review, 14, 35–100.Google Scholar
  37. Wilson v. Seiter, 111 S. Ct. 2321 (1991).Google Scholar
  38. Zapf, P. A., Boccaccini, M. T., & Brodsky, S. L. (2003). Assessment of competency for execution: Professional guidelines and an evaluation checklist. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 21, 103–120.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael R. Quattrocchi
    • 1
  1. 1.Independent PracticeFishersUSA

Personalised recommendations