Request Mechanisms to Reduce the Contention Period in 802.16: A Comparison

  • Jesús Delicado
  • Francisco M. Delicado
  • Luis Orozco–Barbosa
Part of the IFIP International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 284)

Nowadays, a large number of applications characterized by stringent end—to—end requirements are on high demand. The development of Broadband Wireless Access (BWA) should enable the ubiquitous and cost-effective deployment of such applications. The IEEE 802.16 standard is currently one of the promising BWA technology under development. The IEEE 802.16 defines the principles of the Physical and Medium Access Control mechanisms to be implemented by the standard. Under the proposed MAC protocol, the Base Station (BS) is responsible of allocating the bandwidth required by the Subscriber Stations (SS). A SS issues its bandwidth request during a pre–defined contention period. Since the user data and signalling data are transmitted over the same band, the design of efficient signalling mechanism aiming to reduce the time and space length of the contention period is nowadays the main focus of a large number of studies. In this paper, we introduce and evaluate two novel bandwidth request mechanisms and compare their performance with the signalling mechanisms proposed by the standard.


Medium Access Control Medium Access Control Protocol Subscriber Station Bandwidth Request Contention Period 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Cho, D.H., Song, J.H., Kim, M.S., Han, K.J.: Performance Analysis of the IEEE 802.16 Wireless Metropolitan Area Network. In: 1st International Conference on Distributed Frameworks for Multimedia Applications (DFMA’05), pp. 130-137 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Delicado, J., Delicado, F.M., Orozco-Barbosa, L.: Study of the IEEE 802.16 Contention-based Request Mechanism. In: Personal Wireless Communications (PWC’07), vol. 245, pp. 87-98 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Doha, A., Hassanein, H., Takahara, G.: Performance Evaluation of Reservation Medium Access Control in IEEE 802.16 Networks. In: IEEE International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications, pp. 369-374 (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eklund, C., Marks, R.B., Stanwood, K.L., Wang, S.: IEEE Standard 802.16: A Technical Overview of the WirelessMANTM Air Interface for Broadband Wireless Access. IEEE Communications Magazine 40(6), 98-107 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hawa, M., Petr, D.W.: Quality of Service Scheduling in Cable and Broadband Wireless Access Systems. 10th IEEE International Workshop on Quality of Service pp. 247-255 (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    IEEE: IEEE 802.16 Standard—Local and Metropolitan Area Networks—Part 16: Air Interface for Fixed Broadband Wireless Access Systems (IEEE Std 802.16-2001) (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    IEEE: IEEE 802.16 Standard—Local and Metropolitan Area Networks—Part 16: Air Interface for Fixed Broadband Wireless Access Systems (IEEE Std 802.16-2004) (2004). Revision of IEEE Std 802.16-2001Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    IEEE: IEEE 802.16 Standard—Local and Metropolitan Area Networks—Part 16: Air Interface for Fixed Broadband Wireless Access Systems—Amendment 2: Physical and Medium Access Control Layers for Combined Fixed and Mobile Operation in Licensed Bands and Corrigendum 1 (IEEE Std 802.16e-2005) (2006). Amendment and Corrigendum to IEEE Std 802.16-2004Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Inc., W.C.: Can WiMAX Address Your Applications? WiMAX Forum (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Karam, A., Tobagi, F.: On the Traffic and Service Classes in the Internet. In: In Proc. of IEEE GLOBECOM’00 (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kobliakov, V.A., Turlikov, A.M., Vinel, A.V.: Distributed Queue Random Multiple Access Algorithm for Centralized Data Networks. In: 10th International Symposium on Consumer Electronics (ISCE’06), pp. 1-6 (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oh, S.M., Kim, J.H.: The Analysis of the Optimal Contention Period for Broadband Wireless Access Network. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom’05 Workshops), pp. 215-219 (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    OPNET Technologies, I.: OPNET Modeler 11.5 (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vinel, A., Zhang, Y., Lott, M., Tiurlikov, A.: Performance Analysis of the Random Access in IEEE 802.16. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC’05), vol. 3, pp. 1596-1600 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vinel, A., Zhang, Y., Ni, Q., Lyakhov, A.: Efficient Request Mechanism Usage in IEEE 802.16. In: Proccedings of the IEEE GLOBECOM’06 (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yan, J., Kuo, G.S.: Cross-layer Design of Optimal Contention Period for IEEE 802.16 BWA Systems. In: IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC’06), vol. 4, pp. 1807-1812 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jesús Delicado
    • 1
  • Francisco M. Delicado
    • 1
  • Luis Orozco–Barbosa
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto de Investigación en Informática de Albacete (IA)Universidad de Castilla–La Mancha (UCLM)Spain

Personalised recommendations