Advertisement

Environmental Monitoring Aware Routing in Wireless Sensor Networks

  • Bernd-Ludwig Wenning
  • Dirk Pesch
  • Andreas Timm-Giel
  • Carmelita Görg
Part of the IFIP International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 284)

Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) are designed for many monitoring and surveillance tasks. A typical scenario category is the use of WSNs for disaster detection in environmental scenarios. In disasters such as forest fires, volcano outbreaks or flood disasters, the monitored events have the potential to destroy the sensor devices themselves. This has implications for the network lifetime, performance and robustness. While a fairly large body of work addressing routing in WSNs exists, little attention has been paid to the aspect of node failures caused by the sensed phenomenon itself. This contribution presents a routing method that is aware of the node's destruction threat and adapts the routes accordingly, before node failure results in broken routes, delay and power consuming route re-discovery. The performance of the presented routing scheme is evaluated and compared to AODV based routing in the same scenario.

Keywords

Sensor Network Sensor Node Wireless Sensor Network Mobile Networking Network Lifetime 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    C. Perkins, E. Belding-Royer, S. Das, Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing, IETF RFC 3561, July 2003.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Open-ZB, OpenSource Toolset for IEEE 802.15.4 and ZigBee, http://open-zb.net, 2007.
  3. 3.
    OPNET, OPNET Modeler, http://opnet.com/solutions/network rd/modeler.html, 2007.
  4. 4.
    W.B. Heinzelman, A.P. Chandrakasan, H. Balakrishnan, An application-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , 1(4): 660-670, October 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Lindsey, C.S. Raghavendra, PEGASIS: power efficient gathering in sensor information systems, in: Proc. IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, Montana, March 2002.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Manjeshwar and D.P. Agrawal, TEEN: A Protocol For Enhanced Eficiency in Wireless Sensor Networks, in Proceedings of the 1International Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Computing Issues in Wireless Networks and Mobile Computing, San Francisco, CA April 2001.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Kulik, W. Heinzelman, H. Balakrishnan, Negotiation based protocols for disseminating information in wireless sensor networks, ACM Wireless Networks, Vol. 8, Mar-May 2002, pp.169-185.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. Intanagonwiwat, R. Govindan, D. Estrin, J. Heidemann, F. Silva, Directed diffusion for wireless sensor networking, IEEE/ACM Transactions on NetworkingIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 11, February 2003.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. Pandana, K.J.R. Liu, Maximum connectivity and maximum lifetime energy-aware routing for wireless sensor networks, in Proc. of Global Telecommunications Conference GLOBECOM 2005.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. Kalpakis, K. Dasgupta, P. Namjoshi, Maximum Lifetime Data Gathering and Aggregation in Wireless Sensor Networks, in Proc. of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Networking (ICN’02), Atlanta, Georgia, August 26-29, 2002.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    C. Mascolo, M. Musolesi, SCAR: Context-Aware Adaptive Routing in Delay Tolerant Mobile Sensor Networks, in Proc. of the 2006 International Conference on Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2006, pp. 533-538.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Musolesi, S. Hailes, C. Mascolo, Adaptive Routing for Intermittently Connected Mobile Ad Hoc Networks, in Proc. of the Sixth IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM) 2005, pp. 183-189.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Q. Liang, Q. Ren, Energy and Mobility Aware Geographical Multipath Routing for Wireless Sensor Networks, in Poc. of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference 2005, pp. 1867-1871.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernd-Ludwig Wenning
    • 1
  • Dirk Pesch
    • 2
  • Andreas Timm-Giel
    • 1
  • Carmelita Görg
    • 1
  1. 1.Communication NetworksUniversity of BremenGermany
  2. 2.Centre for Adaptive Wireless SystemsCork Institute of TechnologyIreland

Personalised recommendations