Advertisement

Insider Trading in Developing Economies

  • Robert W. McGee

Keywords

Corporate Governance Inside Trading Inside Information Hostile Takeover Utilitarian Ethic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aquinas, St. Thomas. (1920). Summa Theologica, II-II, Q.77. Available at http://www.newadvent.org/ summa.
  2. Bandow, D. (1988). Curbing raiders is bad for business. The New York Times, February 7.Google Scholar
  3. Barath, D. (1960). The just price and the costs of production according to St. Thomas Aquinas. New Scholasticism, 34, 420.Google Scholar
  4. Bartell, E. (1962). Value, price, and St. Thomas. The Thomist, 25(3), 359–360.Google Scholar
  5. Bubb, F. W. (1986). Hostile acquisitions and the restructuring of corporate America. The Freeman, 36(5), 166–176.Google Scholar
  6. Buttarazzi, J. E. (1987). Corporate takeovers: What is the federal role? Backgrounder 606, The Heritage Foundation, September 29.Google Scholar
  7. Carlton, D. W., & Fischel, D. R. (1983). The regulation of insider trading. Stanford Law Review, 35: 857–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chiarella v. United States, 445 U.S. 222 (1980).Google Scholar
  9. Coffee, J. C., Jr., Grundfest, J. A., Romano, R., & Weidenbaum, M. L. (1988). Corporate takeovers: Who wins; who loses; who should regulate? Regulation, 88(1), 23–29, 47–51.Google Scholar
  10. Crisp, R. (1997). Mill on utilitarianism.London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Dalcourt, G. J. (1965). The philosophy and writings of St. Thomas Aquinas(p. 105). New York: Simon and Schuster/Monarch Press.Google Scholar
  12. Demsetz, H. (1969). Perfect competition, regulation, and the stock market, in Henry G. M. (ed.), Economic policy and the regulation of corporate securities.Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
  13. Dirks v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 463 U.S. 646 (1983).Google Scholar
  14. Easterbrook, F. H. (1981). Insider trading, secret agents, evidentiary privileges, and the production of information. Supreme Court Review, 1981, 309–365.Google Scholar
  15. Finnerty, J. E. (1976). Insiders and market efficiency. The Journal of Finance, 31(4), 1141–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frey, R.G. (ed.) (1984). Utility and rights.Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  17. Goodin, R.E. (1995). Utilitarianism as a public philosophy. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Herzel, L., & Katz, L. (1987). Insider trading: who loses? Lloyds Bank Review, July, 15–26.Google Scholar
  19. Hetherington, J. A. C. (1967). Insider trading and the logic of the law. Wisconsin Law Review, 1967: 720–737.Google Scholar
  20. Jarell, G. A., Brickley, J. A., & Netter, J. M. (1988). The market for corporate control: The empirical evidence since 1980. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Winter, 49–68.Google Scholar
  21. Jensen, M. C. (1984). Takeovers: Folklore and science. Harvard Business Review,November– December, 109–121.Google Scholar
  22. Johnson, J. A. (1986–87). Antitakeover legislation: Not necessary, not wise. Cleveland State Law Review, 35, 303–348.Google Scholar
  23. Kelly, W. A., Jr., Nardinelli, C., & Wallace, M. S. (1987). Regulation of insider trading: rethinking SEC policy rules. The Cato Journal, 7(2), 441–448.Google Scholar
  24. Macey, J. R. (1988). The SEC’s insider trading proposal: Good politics, bad policy.Policy Analysis No. 101. Washington, DC: Cato Institute, March 31, 2.Google Scholar
  25. Manne, H. G. (1966a) Insider trading and the stock market.JSD dissertation, Yale University, New Heaven, CT.Google Scholar
  26. Manne, H. G. (1966b). Insider trading and the stock market.New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  27. Manne, H. G. (1966c). In defense of insider trading. Harvard Business Review,November/ December, 113–122.Google Scholar
  28. Manne, H. G. (1970). Insider trading and the law professors. Vanderbilt Law Review, 23: 547–590.Google Scholar
  29. Manne, H. G. (1985). Insider trading and property rights in new information. The Cato Journal, 4(3), 933–943, reprinted in J. A. Dorn & H. G. Manne (eds.), Economic liberties and the judiciary. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Press, 1987, 317–327.Google Scholar
  30. Manne, H. G. (1986). The real Boesky-case issue. The New York Times, November 25, A-27, column 1.Google Scholar
  31. Martin, J. K. (1986). Insider trading and the misappropriation theory: Has the second circuit gone too far? St. John’s Law Review, 16(1), 78–112.Google Scholar
  32. McGee, R. W. (1994). The fatal flaw in NAFTA, GATT and All other trade agreements. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 14(3), 549–565.Google Scholar
  33. McMenamin, M. (1988, October). Witchhunt. Reason, 20(5), 34–40.Google Scholar
  34. Morgan, R. J. (1987). Insider trading and the infringement of property rights. Ohio State Law Journal, 48, 79–116.Google Scholar
  35. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2004). Principles of Corporate Governance. Paris: Author.Google Scholar
  36. Padilla, A. (2002). Can agency theory justify the regulation of insider trading? The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 5(1), 3–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Prychitko, D. L. (1987).Corporate takeovers and shareholder interests.Issue Alert No. 13, Washington, DC: Citizens for a Sound Economy, April 16.Google Scholar
  38. Rider, B. A., & Ffrench, L. (1979). The regulation of insider trading.Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana.Google Scholar
  39. Romano, R. (1987). The political economy of takeover statutes. Virginia Law Review, 73: 111–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rothbard, M. N. (1970). Man, economy and state.Los Angeles, Nash Publishing.Google Scholar
  41. Schotland, R. A. (1967). Unsafe at any price: A reply to manne, insider trading and the stock market. Virginia Law Review, 53, 1425–1478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Scott, K. E. (1980, December). Insider trading: rule 10b-5, disclosure and corporate privacy. Journal of Legal Studies, 9, 801–818.Google Scholar
  43. Shaw, W. H. (1999). Contemporary ethics: Taking account of utilitarianism.Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  44. Webster (1964). Webster’s new world dictionary of the American Language (College ed.). Cleveland and New York: World Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  45. Woodward, S. E. (1988). How much Indiana’s anti-takeover law cost shareholders. The Wall Street Journal, May 5.Google Scholar
  46. World Bank. (2002). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Mauritius, October.World Bank. Retrieved from http://www. worldbank.org.
  47. World Bank. (2003). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Chile, May.World Bank. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org.
  48. World Bank. (2003). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Colombia, August.World Bank. Retrieved from http://www. worldbank.org.
  49. World Bank. (2003). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Republic of Korea, September.World Bank. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org.
  50. World Bank. (2003). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Mexico, September. World Bank. Retrieved from http://www. worldbank.org.
  51. World Bank. (2003). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Republic of South Africa, July.World Bank. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org.
  52. World Bank. (2004). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Egypt, March.World Bank. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org.
  53. World Bank. (2004). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, India, April.World Bank. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org.
  54. World Bank. (2004). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Republic of Indonesia, April.World Bank. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org.
  55. World Bank. (2004). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Jordan, June.World Bank. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org.
  56. World Bank. (2004). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Panama, June.World Bank. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org.
  57. World Bank. (2004). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Republic of Peru, June.World Bank. Retrieved from http://www. worldbank.org.
  58. World Bank. (2005). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Brazil, May.World Bank. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org.
  59. World Bank. (2005). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Ghana, May.World Bank. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org.
  60. World Bank. (2005). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Malaysia, June.World Bank. Retrieved from http://www. worldbank.org.
  61. World Bank. (2005). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Nepal, April.World Bank. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org.
  62. World Bank. (2005). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Pakistan, June.World Bank. Retrieved from http://www. worldbank.org.
  63. World Bank. (2005). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Thailand, June.World Bank. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org.
  64. World Bank. (2005). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Uruguay. September.World Bank. Retrieved from http://www. worldbank.org.
  65. World Bank. (2006). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Bhutan, December.World Bank. Retrieved from http://www. worldbank.org.
  66. World Bank. (2006). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Philippines, May.World Bank. Retrieved from http://www. worldbank.org.
  67. World Bank. (2006). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Senegal, June.World Bank. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org.
  68. World Bank. (2006). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Vietnam, June.World Bank. Retrieved from http://www. worldbank.org.
  69. World Bank. (n.d.). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Turkey.World Bank. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org.
  70. World Bank. (n.d.). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Zimbabwe.World Bank. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org.
  71. Wu, H.K. (1968, February). An economist looks at section 16 of the securities exchange act of 1934. Columbia Law Review, 68: 260–269Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science +Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert W. McGee
    • 1
  1. 1.Florida International UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations