Advertisement

Corporate Governance in Developing Economies

  • Robert W. McGee

Keywords

European Union Corporate Governance Transition Economy Audit Committee Minority Shareholder 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Accounting Principles Board. (1970). Basic concepts and accounting principles underlying financial statements of business enterprises – statement no. 4. New York: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous. (2001a, February 24). Minority what? Economist., 358(8210), 72.Google Scholar
  3. Anonymous, (December 2000/January 2001b). S&P devises scoring system for corporate governance risk. Central European., 10(10), 20–21.Google Scholar
  4. Apreda, R. (2001). Corporate Governance in Argentina: the outcome of economic freedom (1991–2000). Corporate Governance, 9(4), 298–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashton, R. H., Graul, P. R., & Newton J. D. (1989). Audit delay and the timeliness of corporate reporting. Contemporary Accounting Research, 5(2), 657–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Atiase, R. K., Bamber, L. S., & Tse S. (1989). Timeliness of financial reporting, the firm size effect, and stock price reactions to annual earnings announcements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 5(2), 526–552.Google Scholar
  7. Basu, S. (1997). The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting & Economics 24, 3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Black, B. (2000, June). Does corporate governance matter? A crude test using Russian data. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 149(6), 2131–2150.Google Scholar
  9. Black, B. S., de Carvalho, A. G., & Gorga, E. (2008). An overview of Brazilian corporate governance. Cornell Law School Research Paper No. 08–014. Available at www.ssrn.com.Google Scholar
  10. British Accounting Association Corporate Governance Special Interest Group website retrieved from http://www.baacgsig.qub.ac.uk/
  11. Buck, T. (2003). Modern Russian corporate governance: Convergent forces or product of Russia’s history? Journal of World Business, 38(4), 299–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cadbury Report. (1992). Report of the Committee on Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance, December 1, London: Gee Publishing Ltd. Available at http://www.worldbank.org/html/fpd/ privatesector/cg/docs/cadbury.pdf.Google Scholar
  13. Center for International Private Enterprise. (2002). Instituting corporate governance in developing, emerging and transitional economies: A handbook.Washington, DC: Author. retrieved from www.cipe.org.Google Scholar
  14. Chai, M. L., & Tung, S. (2002). The effect of earnings-announcement timing on earnings management. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 29(9&10), 1337–1354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chambers, A. E., & Penman, S. H. (1984). Timeliness of reporting and the stock price reaction to earnings announcements. Journal of Accounting Research, 22(1), 21–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cheung, S. Y. L., & Chan, B. Y. (2004). Corporate governance in Asia. Asia-Pacific Development Journal, 11(2), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cheung, S. Y. L., & Jang, H. (2006). Scorecard on corporate governance in East Asia. Working Paper No. 13. Waterloo, Ontario, Canada: The Centre for International Governance Innovation.Google Scholar
  18. Clarke, T. (2000). Haemorrhaging tigers: the power of international financial markets and the weakness of Asian modes of corporate governance. Corporate Governance, 8(2), 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Corporate Monitoring retrieved from http://www.corpmon.com/
  20. Cruces, J. J., & Kawamura, E. (2006). Insider trading and corporate governance in Latin America: A sequential grade model approach. Available at www.ssrn.com.Google Scholar
  21. Da Silva, W. M., & de Lira Alves, L. A. (2004). The voluntary disclosure of financial information on the internet and the firm value effect in companies across Latin America. Available at www.ssrn.com.Google Scholar
  22. Davies, B., & Whittred, G. P. (1980). The association between selected corporate attributes and timeliness in corporate reporting: Further analysis. Abacus, 16(1), 48–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Davis Global Advisors. (2007). Leading corporate governance indicators, Newton, MA: Author. Annual publication. retrieved from http://www.davisglobal.com/publications/lcgi/index.html
  24. Dwyer, P. D., & Wilson, E. R. (1989). An empirical investigation of factors affecting the timeliness of reporting by municipalities. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 8(1), 29–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Encyclopedia of Corporate Governanceretrieved from http://www.encycogov.com/
  26. European Corporate Governance Institute website retrieved from http://www.ecgi.org/
  27. European Corporate Governance Institute link to Codes retrieved from http://www.ecgi.org/codes/ all_codes.htm
  28. Feinberg, P. (2000, November 13). Historically indifferent Russia starts to heed corporate governance rules, Pensions & Investments, 28(23), 18–19.Google Scholar
  29. Filatotchev, I., Buck, T., & Zhukov, V. (2000). Downsizing in privatized firms in Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 286–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Filatotchev, I., Wright, M., Uhlenbruck, K., Tihanyi, L., & Hoskisson, R. (2003). Governance, organizational capabilities, and restructuring in transition economies. Journal of World Business, 38(4), 331–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Financial Accounting Standards Board. (1980). Statement of financial accounting concepts no. 2, qualitative characteristics of accounting information.Stamford, CT: Author.Google Scholar
  32. Gatamah, K. (2004). The corporate enterprise in Africa: Governance, citizenship and social responsibility. Corporate Ownership & Control, 1(3), 139–144.Google Scholar
  33. Gigler, F. B., & Hemmer, T. (2001). Conservatism, optimal disclosure policy, and the timeliness of financial reports. The Accounting Review, 76(4), 471–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Givoli, D., & Palmon D. (1982). Timeliness of annual earnings announcements: Some empirical evidence. The Accounting Review, 57(3), 486–508.Google Scholar
  35. Global Corporate Governance Forum retrieved from http://www.gcgf.org/
  36. Greenbury Report. (1995). Directors’ remuneration: report of a study group chaired by Sir Richard Greenbury.London: Gee Publishing Ltd. Retrieved July 17, from http://www.baacgsig.qub. ac.uk/
  37. Gregory, H. L. (2000). International comparison of corporate governance guidelines and codes of best practice: Investor viewpoints.New York: Weil, Gotshal & Manges and Egon Zehnder International.Google Scholar
  38. Haigh, A. (2001). We view Russia’s future with optimism. Kommersant-Daily, January 26 retrieved from www.pwcglobal.ru/.Google Scholar
  39. Hampel Committee. (1998). Hampel Committee report, London: Gee Publishing Ltd., January. Available at http://www.ecgi.org/codes/country_documents/uk/hampel_index.htm
  40. Han, J. C. Y., & Wild, J. J. (1997). Timeliness of reporting and earnings information transfers. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 24(3&4), 527–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Haw, I.-M., Qi, D., & Wu, W. (2000). Timeliness of annual report releases and market reaction to earnings announcements in an emerging capital market: The case of China. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 11(2), 108–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hussain, S. H., & Mallin, C. (2002). Corporate Governance in Bahrain. Corporate Governance, 10(3), 197–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hussain, S. H., & Mallin, C. (2003). The dynamics of corporate governance in Bahrain: Structure, responsibilities and operation of corporate boards. Corporate Governance, 11(3), 249–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Independent Directors Association website retrieved from www.independentdirector.ruGoogle Scholar
  45. Independent Directors Association. (2003). Independent director code(April 15 Draft), Moscow: Independent Directors Association. Available at www.independentdirector.ru.Google Scholar
  46. Institute of Corporate Law and Corporate Governance website retrieved from www.iclg.ruGoogle Scholar
  47. Institute of Corporate Law and Corporate Governance. (2002). Managing corporate governance risks in Russia.Moscow: Institute of Corporate Law and Corporate Governance, May.Google Scholar
  48. Institute of International Finance. (2002). Policies for corporate governance and transparency in emerging markets. Retrieved February from www.iif.com/data/public/NEWEAG_Report.pdf.Google Scholar
  49. Instituto Brasileiro de Governanca Corporativa. (2004). Code of Best Practice of Corporate Governance.Google Scholar
  50. International Corporate Governance Network website retrieved from http://www.icgn.org/
  51. International Finance Corporation, Russia Corporate Governance Project website retrieved from http://www2.ifc.org/rcgp/english.htm
  52. Iskyan, K. (2002). Clean-up time in Russia. Global Finance, February, 32–35.Google Scholar
  53. Jindrichovska, I., & Mcleay, S. (2005). Accounting for good news and accounting for bad news: Some empirical evidence from the Czech Republic. European Accounting Review, 14(3), 635–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Judge, W. Q., Naoumova, I., & Kutzevol, N. (2003). Corporate governance in Russia: An empirical study of Russian managers’ perception. Paper presented at the Gorbachev Foundation Conference on Corporate Governance in Transition Economies held at Northeastern University, Boston, April 2003. Published in Journal of World Business, November, 2003, 38(4), 385–396 under the title Corporate Governance and Firm Performance in Russia: An Empirical Study.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Keller, S. B. (1986). Reporting timeliness in the presence of subject to audit qualifications. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 13(1), 117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Krishnan, G. V. (2005). The association between big 6 auditor industry expertise and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 20(3), 209–228.Google Scholar
  57. Kross, W., & Schroeder, D. A. (1984). An empirical investigation of the effect of quarterly earnings announcement timing on stock returns. Journal of Accounting Research, 22(1), 153–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Leventis, S., & Weetman, P. (2004). Timeliness of financial reporting: Applicability of disclosure theories in an emerging capital market. Accounting and Business Research, 34(1), 43–56.Google Scholar
  59. McCarthy, D. J., & Puffer, S. M. (2002). Corporate governance in Russia: Towards a European, US, or Russian model? European Management Journal, 20(6), 630–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. McCarthy, D. J., & Puffer, S. M. (2003). Corporate governance in Russia: A framework for analysis. Journal of World Business, 38(4), 397–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. McGee, R. W. (2006). Timeliness of financial reporting in the energy sector. Russian/CIS Energy & Mining Law Journal, 4(2), 6–10.Google Scholar
  62. McGee, R. W. (2007a). Corporate governance in Russia: A case study of timeliness of financial reporting in the telecom industry. International Finance Review, 7, 365–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. McGee, R. W. (2007b). Corporate governance and the timeliness of financial reporting: A case study of the Russian energy sector. Fifth International Conference on Accounting and Finance in Transition. London, July 12–14.Google Scholar
  64. McGee, R. W. (2007c). Transparency and disclosure in Russia, in T. M. Mickiewicz (ed.), Corporate governance and finance in Poland and Russia(pp. 278–295). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  65. McGee, R. W. (2008a). Insider trading in transition economies. In R. W. McGee (ed.), Corporate governance in transition economies. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  66. McGee, R. W. (2008b). Some thoughts on the market for corporate control. In R. W. McGee (ed.), Corporate governance in transition economies.New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  67. McGee, R. W. (2008c). Corporate governance and the timeliness of financial reporting: An overview. In R. W. McGee (ed.), Corporate governance in transition economies.New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  68. McGee, R. W. (2008d). The timeliness of corporate governance in Russia: A trend analysis. In R. W. McGee (ed.), Corporate governance in transition economies.New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  69. McGee, R. W., & Gunn, R. (2008). The timeliness of financial reporting: A comparative study of Russian and Non-Russian companies in the transportation industry. In R. W. McGee (ed.), Corporate governance in transition economies.New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  70. McGee, R, W., & Igoe, D. N. (2008). Corporate governance and the timeliness of financial reporting: A comparative study of selected EU and transition countries. Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Western Regional Meeting of the American Accounting Association, San Francisco, May 1–3, 2008, 74–87. Revised and reprinted in R. W. McGee (ed.), Corporate governance in transition economies.New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  71. McGee, R. W., & Preobragenskaya, G. G. (2005). Accounting and financial system reform in a transition economy: A case study of Russia. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  72. McGee, R. W., Preobragenskaya, G. G. (2006). Accounting and financial system reform in Eastern Europe and Asia. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  73. McGee, R. W., & Tarangelo, T. (2008a). The timeliness of financial reporting: A comparative study of Russian and Non-Russian banks. In R. W. McGee (ed.), Corporate governance in transition economies. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  74. McGee, R. W., & Tarangelo, T. (2008b). The timeliness of financial reporting and the Russian banking system: An empirical study. In R. W. McGee (ed), Accounting reform in transition and developing economies, New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  75. McGee, R. W., Tarangelo, T., & Tyler, M. (2008). The timeliness of financial reporting: A comparative study of companies in Russia and the USA. In R. W. McGee (ed.), Corporate governance in transition economies.New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  76. McGee, R. W., & Tyler, M. (2008). The timeliness of financial reporting: A comparative study of Russian and Non-Russian companies. In R. W. McGee (ed.), Corporate governance in transition economies.New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  77. McGee, R. W., Tyler, M., Tarangelo, T., & Igoe, D. N. (2008). The timeliness of financial reporting: A comparative study of companies in Russia and the European Union. In R. W. McGee (ed.), Corporate governance in transition economies.New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  78. McGee, R. W., & Yuan, X. (2008). Corporate governance and the timeliness of financial reporting: An empirical study of the People’s Republic of China. International Journal of Business, Accounting and Finance, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  79. McGee, R. W., Yuan, X., Tarangelo, T., & Tyler, M. (2008). The timeliness of financial reporting: A comparative study of the People’s Republic of China and Russia. In R. W. McGee (ed.), Corporate governance in transition economies.New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  80. Metzger, B., Dean, R. N., & Bloom, D. (2002, March/April). Russia’s code of corporate conduct: An innovative approach to solving shareholder rights abuses. The Corporate Governance Advisor, 10(2), 12–17.Google Scholar
  81. Miller, S. (2002, March). Law and order makes its mark. Banker, 152(913), 44–45.Google Scholar
  82. Monks, R.A.G., & Minow, N. (Eds.) (2004). Corporate governance (3rd ed.), London: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  83. Muravyev, A. (2001). Turnover of top executives in Russian companies. Russian Economic Trends, 10(1), 20–24.Google Scholar
  84. National Association of Corporate Directors website retrieved from http://www.nacdonline.org/
  85. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (1999). Principles of Corporate Governance. Paris: Author. Available at www.oecd.org/dataoecd/47/50/4347646.pdf.Google Scholar
  86. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2002). White Paper on Corporate Governance in Russia.Paris: Author, Retrieved April 15, from http://www.oecd.org/ dataoecd/10/3/2789982.pdf.
  87. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2003a). White Paper on Corporate Governance in Asia.Paris: Author.Google Scholar
  88. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2003b). White Paper on Corporate Governance in South Eastern Europe.Paris: Author. Retrieved from www.oecd.org.Google Scholar
  89. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2003c). Survey of Corporate Governance Developments in OECD Countries.Paris: Author.Google Scholar
  90. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2003d). White Paper on Corporate Governance in Latin America.Paris: Author.Google Scholar
  91. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2004). Principles of Corporate Governance. Paris: Author. Available at www.oecd.org.Google Scholar
  92. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2006a). Policy Brief on Corporate Governance of Banks in Asia.Paris: Author.Google Scholar
  93. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2006b). Case Studies of Good Corporate Governance Practices.Paris: Author. Also available in Spanish and Portuguese.Google Scholar
  94. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2007). Asia: Overview of Corporate Governance Frameworks in 2007.Paris: Author.Google Scholar
  95. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development website retrieved from http://www. oecd.org/document/62/0,2340,en_2649_37439_1912830_1_1_1_37439,00.html
  96. Peng, M., Buck, T., & Filatotchev, I. (2003). Do outside directors and new managers help improve firm performance? An exploratory study in Russian privatization. Journal of World Business, 38(4), 348–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Pistor, K., Raiser, M., & Gelfer, S. (2000). Law and finance in transition economies. Economics of Transition, 8(2), 325–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Pope, P. F., & Walker, M. (1999). International differences in the timeliness, conservatism, and classification of earnings. Journal of Accounting Research, 37(Supp.), 53–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Puffer, S. M., & McCarthy, D. J. (2003). The emergence of corporate governance in Russia. Journal of World Business, 38(4), 284–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Rees, W. P., & Giner, B. (2001). On the asymmetric recognition of good and bad news in France, Germany and the UK. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 28(9&10): 1285–1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Reyes, F. (2008). Corporate governance in Latin America. Inter-American Law Review, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  102. Robertson, C. J., Gilley, K. M., & Street, M. D. (2003). The relationship between ethics and firm practices in Russia and the United States. Journal of World Business, 38(4), 375–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Roth, K., & Kostova, T. (2003). Organizational coping with institutional upheaval in transition economies. Journal of World Business, 38(4), 314–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Russian Corporate Governance Roundtable website retrieved from http://www.corp-gov.org/
  105. Russian Institute of Directors website retrieved from www.rid.ruGoogle Scholar
  106. Russian Institute of Directors. (2002). Corporate governance code, Moscow: Author, Retrieved April 5, from www.rid.ru.Google Scholar
  107. Russian Institute of Directors. (2003). Structure and activities of boards of directors of Russian joint-stock companies.Moscow: Author. Retrieved from www.rid.ruGoogle Scholar
  108. Rwegasira, K. (2000). Corporate governance in emerging capital markets: Whither Africa? Corporate Governance 8(3), 258–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Soltani, B. (2002). Timeliness of corporate and audit reports: Some empirical evidence in the French context. The International Journal of Accounting, 37, 215–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Standard & Poor’s. (2004). Country Governance Study: Brazil.Google Scholar
  111. Trueman, B. (1990). Theories of earnings-announcement timing. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 13: 285–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Wagner, J., Stimpert, J., & Fubara, E. (1998). Board composition and organizational performance: Two studies of insider/outsider effects. Journal of Management Studies, 35(5), 655–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Whittred, G., & Zimmer, I. (1984). Timeliness of financial reporting and financial distress. The Accounting Review, 59(2), 287–295.Google Scholar
  114. Whittred, G.P. (1980). Audit qualification and the timeliness of corporate annual reports. The Accounting Review, 55(4): 563–577.Google Scholar
  115. World Bank Corporate Governance website retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org/html/fpd/ privatesector/cg/
  116. World Bank. (2001), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Republic of Croatia, September.Author. Retrieved from www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  117. World Bank. (2002a), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Bulgaria, September.Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  118. World Bank. (2002b), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Czech Republic, July.Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  119. World Bank. (2002c), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Georgia, March.Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  120. World Bank. (2002d), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Latvia, December.Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  121. World Bank. (2002e), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Republic of Lithuania, July.Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  122. World Bank. (2002f), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Mauritius, October.World Bank: Author, Retrieved from www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  123. World Bank. (2003a), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Chile, May.World Bank: Author, Retrieved from www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  124. World Bank. (2003b), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Colombia, August.World Bank. Retrieved from www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  125. World Bank. (2003c), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Republic of Korea, September.World Bank:. Retrieved from www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  126. World Bank. (2003d), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Mexico, September. World Bank: Retrieved from www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  127. World Bank. (2003e), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Republic of South Africa, July.World Bank. Retrieved from www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  128. World Bank. (2003f), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Hungary, February.Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  129. World Bank. (2003g), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Slovak Republic, October.Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  130. World Bank. (2004a), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Moldova, May.Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved from www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  131. World Bank. (2004b), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Romania, April.Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  132. World Bank. (2004c), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Slovenia, May.Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  133. World Bank. (2004d), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Egypt, March.World Bank. Retrieved from www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  134. World Bank. (2004e), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, India, April.World Bank. Retrieved from www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  135. World Bank. (2004f), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Republic of Indonesia, April.World Bank. Retrieved from Retrieved from www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  136. World Bank. (2004g), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Jordan, June.World Bank. Retrieved from www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  137. World Bank. (2004h), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Panama, June.World Bank. Retrieved from www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  138. World Bank. (2004i), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Republic of Peru, June.World Bank. Retrieved from www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  139. World Bank. (2005a), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Brazil, May.World Bank. Retrieved from www. worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  140. World Bank. (2005b), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Ghana, May.World Bank. Retrieved from www. worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  141. World Bank. (2005c), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Gover nance Country Assessment, Malaysia, June.World Bank. Retrieved from www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  142. World Bank. (2005d), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Nepal, April.World Bank. Retrieved from www. worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  143. World Bank. (2005e), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Pakistan, June.World Bank. Retrieved from www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  144. World Bank. (2005f), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Thailand, June.World Bank. Retrieved from www. worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  145. World Bank. (2005g), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Uruguay. September.World Bank. Retrieved from www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  146. World Bank. (2005h), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Armenia, April.Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from www. worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  147. World Bank. (2005i), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Azerbaijan, July.Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  148. World Bank. (2005j), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Macedonia, June.Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from www. worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  149. World Bank. (2005k), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Poland, June.Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  150. World Bank. (2006a), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Bosnia and Herzegovina, June.Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  151. World Bank. (2006b), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Ukraine, October.Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  152. World Bank. (2006c), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Bhutan, December.World Bank. Retrieved from www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  153. World Bank. (2006d), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Philippines, May.World Bank. Retrieved from www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  154. World Bank. (2006e), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Senegal, June.World Bank. Retrieved from www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  155. World Bank. (2006f), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Vietnam, June.World Bank. Retrieved from www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  156. World Bank. (n.d.), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Turkey.World Bank. Retrieved from www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  157. World Bank. (n.d.), Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Zimbabwe.World Bank. Retrieved from www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science +Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert W. McGee
    • 1
  1. 1.Florida International UniversityMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations