Skip to main content

Corporate Governance in Transition Economies

  • Chapter

Corporate governance issues are especially important in transition economies, since these countries do not have the long-established financial institution infrastructure to deal with corporate governance issues. Before the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Soviet Union, there was no need to discuss corporate governance issues because all enterprises were owned by the state and there were no shareholders. All that has changed since 1989. This chapter discusses how transition economies are dealing with corporate governance issues and the extra obstacles they have to overcome due to a lack of established financial institution infrastructure.

Corporate governance has become an important topic in transition economies in recent years. Directors, owners and corporate managers have started to realize that there are benefits that can accrue from having a good corporate governance structure. Good corporate governance helps to increase share price and makes it easier to obtain capital. International investors are hesitant to lend money or buy shares in a corporation that does not subscribe to good corporate governance principles. Transparency, independent directors and a separate audit committee are especially important. Some international investors will not seriously consider investing in a company that does not have these things.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Accounting Principles Board. 1970. Basic Concepts and Accounting Principles Underlying Financial Statements of Business Enterprises – Statement No. 4. New York: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous. 2001a. Minority What? Economist, 24 February, 358(8210): 72

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous, (December 2000/January 2001b). S&P Devises Scoring System for Corporate Governance Risk. Central European 10(10): 20–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, R.H., Graul, P.R., & Newton, J.D. 1989. Audit Delay and the Timeliness of Corporate Reporting. Contemporary Accounting Research 5(2): 657–673

    Google Scholar 

  • Atiase, R.K., Bamber L.S., & Tse, S. 1989. Timeliness of Financial Reporting, the Firm Size Effect, and Stock Price Reactions to Annual Earnings Announcements. Contemporary Accounting Research 5(2): 526–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, S. 1997. The Conservatism Principle and the Asymmetric Timeliness of Earnings. Journal of Accounting & Economics 24: 3–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, B. 2000. Does Corporate Governance Matter? A Crude Test Using Russian Data. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 149(6): 2131–2150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • British Accounting Association Corporate Governance Special Interest Group Web site http://www.baacgsig.qub.ac.uk/

  • Buck, T. 2003. Modern Russian Corporate Governance: Convergent Forces or Product of Russia's History? Journal of World Business 38(4): 299–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadbury, A., et al. 1992. (The Cadbury Report) Report of the Committee on Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance, December 1. London: Gee Publishing Ltd. Available at http://www. worldbank.org/html/fpd/privatesector/cg/docs/cadbury.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for International Private Enterprise. 2002. Instituting Corporate Governance in Developing, Emerging and Transitional Economies: A Handbook. Washington, DC: The Center for International Private Enterprise.Available at http://www.cipe.org

  • Chai, M.L. & Tung, S. 2002. The Effect of Earnings-Announcement Timing on Earnings Management. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 29(9,10): 1337–1354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, A.E. & Penman, S.H. 1984. Timeliness of Reporting and the Stock Price Reaction to Earnings Announcements. Journal of Accounting Research 22(1): 21–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corporate Monitoring. http://www.corpmon.com/

  • Davies, B. & Whittred, G.P. 1980. The Association Between Selected Corporate Attributes and Timeliness in Corporate Reporting: Further Analysis. Abacus 16(1): 48–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis Global Advisors 2007. Leading Corporate Governance Indicators. Newton, MA: Davis Global Advisors. Annual publication. Available at http://www.davisglobal.com/publications/ lcgi/index.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, P.D. & Wilson, E.R. 1989. An Empirical Investigation of Factors Affecting the Timeliness of Reporting by Municipalities. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 8(1): 29–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Encyclopedia of Corporate Governance. http://www.encycogov.com/

  • European Corporate Governance Institute. Web site http://www.ecgi.org/

  • European Corporate Governance Institute link to Codes http://www.ecgi.org/codes/all_codes.htm

  • Feinberg, P. 2000. Historically Indifferent Russia Starts to Heed Corporate Governance Rules, Pensions & Investments 28(23): 18–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Filatotchev, I., Buck, T & Zhukov, V. 2000. Downsizing in Privatized Firms in Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus. Academy of Management Journal 43(3): 286–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filatotchev, I., Wright, M., Uhlenbruck, K, Tihanyi, L. & Hoskisson, R. 2003. Governance, Organizational Capabilities, and Restructuring in Transition Economies. Journal of World Business 38(4): 331–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Financial Accounting Standards Board. 1980. Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 2, Qualitative Characteristics of Accounting Information. Stamford, CT: Financial Accounting Standards Board

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigler, F.B. & Hemmer, T. 2001. Conservatism, Optimal Disclosure Policy, and the Timeliness of Financial Reports. The Accounting Review 76(4): 471–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Givoli, D. & Palmon, D. 1982. Timeliness of Annual Earnings Announcements: Some Empirical Evidence. The Accounting Review 57(3): 486–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Corporate Governance Forum. http://www.gcgf.org/

  • Greenbury, R. et al. 1995. (Greenbury Report). Directors' Remuneration: Report of a Study Group Chaired by Sir Richard Greenbury, 17 July. London: Gee Publishing Ltd. Available at http://www.baacgsig.qub.ac.uk/

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, H.L. 2000. International Comparison of Corporate Governance Guidelines and Codes of Best Practice: Investor Viewpoints. New York: Weil, Gotshal & Manges and Egon Zehnder International

    Google Scholar 

  • Haigh, A. 2001. We View Russia's Future with Optimism. Kommersant-Daily [http://www. pwcglobal.ru/]

  • Hampel Committee. 1998. Hampel Committee Report, January. London: Gee Publishing Ltd. Available at http://www.ecgi.org/codes/country_documents/uk/hampel_index.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, J.C.Y. & Wild, J.J. 1997. Timeliness of Reporting and Earnings Information Transfers. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 24(3,4): 527–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haw, In-Mu, Qi, D., & Wu, W. 2000. Timeliness of Annual Report Releases and Market Reaction to Earnings Announcements in an Emerging Capital Market: The Case of China. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting 11(2): 108–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Independent Directors Association. 2003. Independent Director Code, 15 April Draft. Moscow: Independent Directors Association. Available at http://www.independentdirector.ru. Institute of Corporate Law and Corporate Governance Web site http://www.iclg.ru

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Corporate Law and Corporate Governance. 2002. Managing Corporate Governance Risks in Russia, May. Moscow: Institute of Corporate Law and Corporate Governance

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of International Finance. 2002. Policies for Corporate Governance and Transparency in Emerging Markets (February). Available at http://www.iif.com/data/public/NEWEAG_ Report.pdf

  • International Corporate Governance Network Web site http://www.icgn.org/

  • International Finance Corporation, Russia Corporate Governance Project Web site http://www2.ifc.org/rcgp/english.htm

  • Iskyan, K. 2002. Clean-up Time in Russia. Global Finance, pp. 32–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Jindrichovska, I., & Mcleay, S. 2005. Accounting for Good News and Accounting for Bad News: Some Empirical Evidence from the Czech Republic. European Accounting Review 14(3): 635–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, W.Q., Naoumova, I. & Kutzevol, N. 2003. Corporate Governance in Russia: An Empirical Study of Russian Managers' Perception. Paper presented at the Gorbachev Foundation Conference on Corporate Governance in Transition Economies held at Northeastern University, Boston, April 2003 (published in Journal of World Business 38(4): 385–396 under the title Corporate Governance and Firm Performance in Russia: An Empirical Study)

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, S.B. 1986. Reporting Timeliness in the Presence of Subject to Audit Qualifications. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 13(1): 117–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, G.V. 2005. The Association between Big 6 Auditor Industry Expertise and the Asymmetric Timeliness of Earnings. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 20(3): 209–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Kross, W. & Schroeder, D.A. 1984. An Empirical Investigation of the Effect of Quarterly Earnings Announcement Timing on Stock Returns. Journal of Accounting Research 22(1): 153–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leventis, S. & Weetman, P. 2004. Timeliness of Financial Reporting: Applicability of Disclosure Theories in an Emerging Capital Market. Accounting and Business Research 34(1): 43–56

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, D.J. & Puffer, S.M. 2002. Corporate Governance in Russia: Towards a European, US, or Russian Model? European Management Journal 20(6): 630–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, D.J. & Puffer, S.M. 2003. Corporate Governance in Russia: A Framework for Analysis. Journal of World Business 38(4): 397–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGee, R.W. (2006). Timeliness of Financial Reporting in the Energy Sector. Russian/CIS Energy & Mining Law Journal 4(2): 6–10

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, R.W. (2007a). Corporate Governance in Russia: A Case Study of Timeliness of Financial Reporting in the Telecom Industry. International Finance Review 7: 365–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGee, R.W. (2007b). Corporate Governance and the Timeliness of Financial Reporting: A Case Study of the Russian Energy Sector. Fifth International Conference on Accounting and Finance in Transition, London, 12–14 July

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, R.W. (2007c). Transparency and Disclosure in Russia. In T.M. Mickiewicz (ed.), Corporate Governance and Finance in Poland and Russia. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 278–295

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, R.W. (ed.). (2008a). Insider Trading in Transition Economies.Corporate Governance in Transition Economies. New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, R.W. (ed.). (2008b). Some Thoughts on the Market for Corporate Control. Corporate Governance in Transition Economies. New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, R.W. (ed.). (2008c). Corporate Governance and the Timeliness of Financial Reporting: An Overview. Corporate Governance in Transition Economies. New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, R.W. (ed.). (2008d). The Timeliness of Corporate Governance in Russia: A Trend Analysis. Corporate Governance in Transition Economies. New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, R.W. & Gunn, R. (2008). The Timeliness of Financial Reporting: A Comparative Study of Russian and Non-Russian Companies in the Transportation Industry. In R.W. McGee (ed.), Corporate Governance in Transition Economies. New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, R.W. & Igoe, D.N. (2008). Corporate Governance and the Timeliness of Financial Reporting: A Comparative Study of Selected EU and Transition Countries. Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Western Regional Meeting of the American Accounting Association, San Francisco, 1–3 May, pp. 74–87 (Revised and reprinted in R.W. McGee (ed.), Corporate Governance in Transition Economies. New York: Springer)

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, R.W. & Preobragenskaya, G.G. (2005). Accounting and Financial System Reform in a Transition Economy: A Case Study of Russia. New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, R.W. & Preobragenskaya, G.G. (2006). Accounting and Financial System Reform in Eastern Europe and Asia. New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, R.W. & Tarangelo, T. (2008a). The Timeliness of Financial Reporting and the Russian Banking System: An Empirical Study. In R.W. McGee (ed), Accounting Reform in Transition and Developing Economies. New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, R.W. & Tarangelo, T. (2008b). The Timeliness of Financial Reporting: A Comparative Study of Russian and Non-Russian Banks. In R.W. McGee (ed.), Corporate Governance in Transition Economies. New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, R.W. & Tyler, M. (2008). The Timeliness of Financial Reporting: A Comparative Study of Russian and Non-Russian Companies. In R.W. McGee (ed.), Corporate Governance in Transition Economies. New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, R.W. & Yuan, X. (2008). Corporate Governance and the Timeliness of Financial Reporting: An Empirical Study of the People's Republic of China. International Journal of Business, Accounting and Finance, forthcoming

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, R.W., Tarangelo, T., & Tyler, M. (2008a). The Timeliness of Financial Reporting: A Comparative Study of Companies in Russia and the USA. In R.W. McGee (ed.), Corporate Governance in Transition Economies. New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, R.W., Tyler, M., TarangeloT., & Igoe, D.N. (2008b). The Timeliness of Financial Reporting: A Comparative Study of Companies in Russia and the European Union. In R.W. McGee (ed.), Corporate Governance in Transition Economies. New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, R.W., Yuan, X., Tarangelo, T., & Tyler, M. (2008c). The Timeliness of Financial Reporting: A Comparative Study of the People's Republic of China and Russia. In R.W. McGee (ed.), Corporate Governance in Transition Economies. New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzger, B., Dean, R.N. & Bloom, D. 2002. Russia's Code of Corporate Conduct: An Innovative Approach to Solving Shareholder Rights Abuses. The Corporate Governance Advisor 10(2): 12–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. 2002. Law and Order Makes its Mark. Banker 152(913): 44–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Monks, R.A.G. & Minow, N. (eds,). 2004. Corporate Governance, 3rd edn. London: Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Muravyev, A. 2001. Turnover of Top Executives in Russian Companies. Russian Economic Trends 10(1): 20–24

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association of Corporate Directors Web site http://www.nacdonline.org/

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Web site http://www.oecd.org/document/ 62/0,2340,en_2649_37439_1912830_1_1_1_37439,00.html

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2003. White Paper on Corporate Governance in South Eastern Europe. Paris: OECD. Available at http://www.oecd.org. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2003. Survey of Corporate Governance Developments in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2002. White Paper on Corporate Governance in Russia April 15, Paris: OECD. Available at http://www.oecd.org/ dataoecd/10/3/2789982.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. 1999. Principles of Corporate Governance. Paris: OECD. Available at http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/47/50/4347646.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2004. Principles of Corporate Governance. Paris: OECD. Available at http://www.oecd.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M., Buck, T., & Filatotchev, I. 2003. Do Outside Directors and New Managers Help Improve Firm Performance? An Exploratory Study in Russian Privatization. Journal of World Business 38(4): 348–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pistor, K., Raiser, M., & Gelfer, S. 2000. Law and Finance in Transition Economies. Economics of Transition 8(2): 325–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope, P.F. & Walker, M. 1999. International Differences in the Timeliness, Conservatism, and Classification of Earnings. Journal of Accounting Research 37: 53–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puffer, S.M. & McCarthy, D.J. 2003. The Emergence of Corporate Governance in Russia. Journal of World Business 38(4): 284–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees, W.P. & Giner, B. 2001. On the Asymmetric Recognition of Good and Bad News in France, Germany and the UK. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 28(9&10): 1285–1332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, C.J., Gilley, K.M., & Street, M.D. 2003. The Relationship between Ethics and Firm Practices in Russia and the United States. Journal of World Business 38(4): 375–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, K. & Kostova, T. 2003. Organizational Coping with Institutional Upheaval in Transition Economies. Journal of World Business 38(4): 314–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russian Corporate Governance Roundtable Web site http://www.corp-gov.org/

  • Russian Institute of Directors Web site http://www.rid.ru

  • Russian Institute of Directors. 2002. Corporate Governance Code, April 5. Moscow: Russian Institute of Directors. http://www.rid.ru

    Google Scholar 

  • Russian Institute of Directors. 2003. Structure and Activities of Boards of Directors of Russian Joint-Stock Companies. Moscow: Russian Institute of Directors. Available at http://www.rid.ru

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltani, B. 2002. Timeliness of Corporate and Audit Reports: Some Empirical Evidence in the French Context. The International Journal of Accounting 37: 215–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trueman, B. 1990. Theories of Earnings-Announcement Timing. Journal of Accounting & Economics 13: 285–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J., Stimpert, J., & Fubara, E. 1998. Board Composition and Organizational Performance: Two Studies of Insider/Outsider Effects. Journal of Management Studies 35(5): 655–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittred, G.P. 1980. Audit Qualification and the Timeliness of Corporate Annual Reports. The Accounting Review 55(4): 563–577

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittred, G. & Zimmer, I. 1984. Timeliness of Financial Reporting and Financial Distress. The Accounting Review 59(2): 287–295

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank Corporate Governance Web site http://www.worldbank.org/html/fpd/privatesector/cg/

  • World Bank. (2001). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Republic of Croatia, September. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2002). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Bulgaria, September. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2002). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Czech Republic, July. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2002). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Georgia, March. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2002). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Latvia, December. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2002). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Republic of Lithuania, July. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2002). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Mauritius, October. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2003). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Chile, May. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2003). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Colombia, August. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2003). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Republic of Korea, September. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2003). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Mexico, September. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2003). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Republic of South Africa, July. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2003). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Hungary, February. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2003). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Slovak Republic, October. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2004). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Moldova, May. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2004). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Romania, April. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2004). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Slovenia, May. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2004). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Egypt, March. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2004). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, India, April. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2004). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Republic of Indonesia, April. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2004). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Jordan, June. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2004). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Panama, June. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2004). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Republic of Peru, June. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2005). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Brazil, May. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2005). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Ghana, May. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2005). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Malaysia, June. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2005). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Nepal, April. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2005). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Pakistan, June. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2005). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Thailand, June. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2005). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Uruguay. September. Washington, DC: World Bank.http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2005). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Armenia, April. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2005). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Azerbaijan, July. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2005). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Macedonia, June. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2005). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Poland, June. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2006). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Bosnia and Herzegovina, June. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2006). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Ukraine, October. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2006). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Bhutan, December. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2006). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Philippines, May. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2006). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Senegal, June. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2006). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Vietnam, June. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (n.d.). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Turkey. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (n.d.). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Zimbabwe, Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www. worldbank.org

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McGee, R.W. (2008). Corporate Governance in Transition Economies. In: McGee, R.W. (eds) Corporate Governance in Transition Economies. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-84831-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics