Advertisement

E-Health Service in Taiwan–The Role of Organizational Innovativeness

  • Hsieh-Hua Yang
  • Jui-Chen Yu
  • Hung-Jen Yang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 27)

Abstract

In Taiwan, the electronic information and online services provided by the health bureaus and the district health centers are still in their infancy. We argue that the inclusion of personal innovativeness and organizational innovativeness with respect to information technology would help us to further understand how perceptions are formed and the subsequent role they play in the formation of usage attitude. In this study, two comparable research models are tested. Findings reveal that compatibility has an effect on both perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use; and that personal innovativeness has a direct effect on perceived ease of use, but not on perceived usefulness; while organizational innovativeness has a direct effect on attitude. Some theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Keywords

Technology Acceptance Model External Variable Usage Attitude Health Bureau Innovative Service 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Adams DA, Nelson RR, Todd PA (1992) Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication. MIS Q 16(2):227–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Agarwal R., Prasad J (1998) A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Inform Syst Res 9(2):204–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Agarwal R, Sambamurthy V, Stair RM (2000) Research report: the evolving relationship between general and specific computer self-efficacy—an empirical assessment. Inform Syst Res 11(4):418–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burton-Jones A, Hubona GS (2006) The mediation of external variables in the technology acceptance model. Inform Manag 43:706–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chau PYK, Hu PJH (2001) Information technology acceptance. Decis Sci 32(4):699–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cheng B-S (1990) A quantitive assessment of value in organizational culture. Chin J Psychol 32:31–49Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Damanpour F (1987) The adoption of technological, administrative, and ancillary innovations: impact of organizational factors. J Manag 13(4):673–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag Sci 35(8):982–1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Davis FD (1993) User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. Int J Man-Mach Studies 38:475–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Health Department Online Public Service Plan—2004 Report. Retrieved from www.doh.gov.tw
  11. 11.
    2005Health_Information_Report.pdf. Retrieved from www.doh.gov.tw
  12. 12.
    Hung S-Y, Chang C-M, Yu T-J (2006) Determinants of user acceptance of the e-government services: the case of online TAC filing and payment system. Gov Inform Q 23:97–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Karahanna E, Straub DW, Chervany NL (1999) Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Q 23(2):183–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    King WR, He J (2006) A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Inform Manag 43:740–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Legris P, Ingham J, Collerette P (2003) Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Inform Manag 40(3):191–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lewis W, Agarwal R, Sambamurthy V (2003) Sources of influence on beliefs about information technology use: an empirical study of knowledge workers. MIS Q 27(4):657–678Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Health Care AdministrationOriental Institute of TechnologyBanciao CityTaiwan
  2. 2.National Science and Technology MuseumKaohsiungROC
  3. 3.Department of Health Care AdministrationOriental Institute of TechnologyBanciao CityTaiwan

Personalised recommendations