3D Reconstruction: Estimating Depth of Hole from 2D Camera Perspectives

  • Muhammad Abuzar Fahiem
  • Shaiq A. Haq
  • Farhat Saleemi
  • Huma Tauseef
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 27)


In this paper we have implemented a novel approach called perception-based vision (PBV) to retrieve depth information of a hole from a single camera perspective. Three dimensional modeling of real world objects is always of great concern for scientists and engineers. Different approaches are used for this purpose, e.g., 3D scanners, CAD modeling, and contour tracing by coordinate measuring machines (CMMs). This paper does not deal with 3D modeling as a whole but specifically addresses the issue of depth information retrieval of a hole. This is a cost effective, efficient, and accurate solution and requires just a single 2D camera perspective under ambient conditions.


Depth Information Coordinate Measuring Machine Structure Light Real World Object Constructive Solid Geometry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Scott WR, Roth G, Rivest JF (2003) View planning for automated three-dimensional object reconstruction and inspection. ACM Comput Surv 35(1):64–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bernardini F, Rushmeier H (2002) The 3D model acquisition pipeline. Comput Graph Forum 21(2):149–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carbone V, Carocci M, Savio E, Sansoni G, De-Chiffre L (2001) Combination of a vision system and a coordinate measuring machine for the reverse engineering of freeform surfaces. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 17:263–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blais F, Beraldin JA, El-Hakim S, Godin G (2003) New developments in 3D laser scanners: from static to dynamic multi-modal systems. In: 6th Conference on Optical 3-D Measurement TechniquesGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xu Y, Xu C, Tian Y, Ma S, Luo M (1998) 3-D face image acquisition and reconstruction system. IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dipanda A, Woo S (2004) Structured light system configuration determination for efficient 3D surface reconstruction. International Conference on Image ProcessingGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Skydan OA, Lalor MJ, Burton DR (2002) Technique for phase measurement and surface reconstruction by use of colored structured light. Appl Opt 41(29):6104–6117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li H, Straub R, Prautzsch H (2004) Fast subpixel accurate reconstruction using color structured light. In: Proceedings of the Fourth IASTED International Conference on Visualization, Imaging, and Image ProcessingGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gledhill D, Tian GY, Taylor D, Clarke D (2004) 3D reconstruction of a region of interest using structured light and stereo panoramic images. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Information VisualisationGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fofi D, Salvi J, Mouaddib EM (2003) Uncalibrated reconstruction: an adaptation to structured light vision. Patt Recogn 36:1631–1644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang W, Grinstein GG (1993) A survey of 3D solid reconstruction from 2D projection line drawings. Comput Graph Forum 12(2):137–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Company P, Piquer A, Contero M, Naya F (2005) A survey on geometrical reconstruction as a core technology to sketch-based modeling. Comput Graph 29:892–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muhammad Abuzar Fahiem
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shaiq A. Haq
    • 1
  • Farhat Saleemi
    • 2
  • Huma Tauseef
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Engineering and TechnologyLahorePakistan
  2. 2.Lahore College for Women UniversityLahorePakistan

Personalised recommendations