Ankara Technology Development Zones Within the Context of Innovation Strategies in Turkey

  • Cigdem Varol
  • N. Aydan Sat
  • Asli Gurel Ucer
  • Gulsen Yilmaz
Part of the International Studies In Entrepreneurship book series (ISEN, volume 21)


Contemporary discussions on new economy have displayed that competitiveness of regions greatly depend on innovation regarded as a complex process involving many different functions, actors, and relationships. To improve the innovative performances of agents of production in the system and to promote interactions between them, national and regional innovation systems are developed. As a part of regional innovation systems, technology development zones (TDZs) appear as an environment that transforms innovative ideas to marketable products by utilizing collective learning processes among universities, innovative firms, and innovation support institutions. The aim of this study is to discuss the innovative strategies, thus the various instruments and institutional arrangements to encourage technology development in Turkey, and the efforts of building innovation capacity through the initiatives of TDZs in Ankara. Within this context, first of all, the innovation capability of Turkey in terms of R\&D activities, policies, actors, and spatial repercussions under the name of TDZs are discussed. Second, the three TDZs in Ankara are analyzed in details. At the end, with the comparison of the three TDZs, the innovative capacity of TDZs and the effects of government support in this process are evaluated briefly.


Venture Capital Innovation Policy Technology Policy Innovation Capability Sectoral Distribution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Cooke, P., Heidenreich, M. and Braczyk H.J. (2004). Regional innovation systems: the role of governance in a globalized world. London, 2nd edition, New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Cilingir, C. (2004). Technology development zones: tools for enhancing university industry relations, Knowledge Economic Forum. Barcelona: Unpublished Presentation.Google Scholar
  3. DPT (1985). Besinci bes yillik kalkinma plani 1985–1989. Ankara: Devlet Planlama Teskilati Mustesarligi, Yayin No: 1974. Cited 18 Nov 2006
  4. DPT (1990). Altinci bes yillik kalkinma plani 1990–1994. Ankara: Devlet Planlama Teskilati Mustesarligi, Yayin No: 2174. Cited 18 Nov 2006
  5. DPT (1996). Yedinci bes yillik kalkinma plani 1995–2000. Ankara: Devlet Planlama Teskilati Mustesarligi. Cited 18 Nov 2006
  6. Elci, S. (2003). Innovation policy in seven candidate countries: the challenges, innovation policy profile: Turkey. Final Report, Volume 2, ADE—SSEES—LOGOTECH.Google Scholar
  7. Galbraith, K. (2002). Technology parks become a force in Europe, Chronicle of Higher Education, 48(18), 120–35.Google Scholar
  8. Goker, A., and Akarsoy, T. (1996). Turkiye’nin bilim ve teknoloji politikasi. I. Turkiye Endustri Muhendisligi Ogrencileri Bulusmasi, Teknoloji Politikalari ve Teknoloji Yonetimi Semineri. Denizli.Google Scholar
  9. Karabulut, Z. (2006). Teknoloji gelistirme bolgeleri. 3. Teknoparklar Zirvesi. Istanbul: ITO Meclis Salonu Bogazici Universitesi. Cited 21 Feb 2007
  10. Lundvall, B.A. (ed.) (1992). National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  11. Nelson, R.R. (ed.) (1993). National systems of innovation: a comparative study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. OECD (2002a) The measurement of scientific and technological activities. Frascati Manual 2002: Proposed standard practice for surveys on research and experimental development. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  13. OECD (2002b). Benchmarking industry-science relationships. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  14. OECD (2005) Science, technology and industry: Scoreboard 2005. http://oberon. Cited 08 May 2006.
  15. Pakpese, O. (1996). Dunyada teknopark uygulamalari ve Turkiye’de serbest bolge statusunde teknopark modeli. Ankara: Basbakanlik Dis Ticaret Mustesarligi: Unpublished Document.Google Scholar
  16. Sanayi Bakanligi (2007). Kurulusu tamamlanan teknoloji gelistirme bolgeleri. http://www.sanayi. Cited 08 May 2007
  17. Soubbotina, T. P. (2006). Generic models of technological learning by developing countries. World Bank: draft papers prepared for WB science and technology program.Google Scholar
  18. TUBITAK (1997). Turkiye’nin bilim ve teknoloji politikasi, Bilim ve Teknoloji Strateji ve Politika Calismalari, Ankara: BTP 97/04.Google Scholar
  19. TUBITAK (2007). Vizyon 2023. Bilim, teknoloji ve yenilik politikalari daire baskanligi.\&sid=472\&pid=468. Cited 19 May 2007
  20. TUIK (2007). 2005 yili arastirma ve gelistirme faaliyetleri arastirmasi. Haber Bulteni, 129.Google Scholar
  21. Varol, C., Sat, N.A., Gurel Ucer, Z.A. & Yilmaz, G. (2007). Kuresel sisteme entegrasyonda yenilikci uretim kapasitesinin rolu: Turkiye teknoparklari uzerinden bir degerlendirme (The Role of Innovative Production Capacity in the Integration to the Global System: An Evaluation over Technoparks in Turkey). Ankara: Unpublished Research Report.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cigdem Varol
    • 1
  • N. Aydan Sat
    • 2
  • Asli Gurel Ucer
    • 2
  • Gulsen Yilmaz
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of City and Regional PlanningGazi University Celal Bayar Boulevard06570 Maltepe
  2. 2.Department of City and Regional PlanningGazi University Celal Bayar BoulevardAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations