Advertisement

The Phenomenology of Creativity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship

  • Lance B. Kurke
Part of the International Studies In Entrepreneurship book series (ISEN, volume 21)

Abstract

In our social world, we find extreme variations in the patterns of creati\-vity, innovation, and success at the entrepreneurial activities derived from those patterns. It is the author’s assertion that greater rates of creativity can be achieved by joining the sociological study of phenomenology to that of the entrepreneurial and economic disciplines. In particular, this paper considers the culmination of 100~years of sociological theorizing that has not penetrated various other social disciplines and practical applications, like entrepreneurship, leadership, and strategic planning. Phenomenology is discussed using six assumptions: People have a stock knowledge that is their reality; this stock knowledge bestows a taken-for-granted sense of reality; we learn this stock knowledge from each other; we assume that others share our stock knowledge; there is nothing intrinsic about what we believe to be real in our social world; and there is a presumption\break that the world is the same for all other people that we inhabit a common social world. Three kinds of examples are provided—political, organizational/economic, and historical/military. In all three examples, the author applies phenomenology to show how creativity is unbounded by applying the concepts of phenomenology and thereby breaking the presumed constraints of our social beliefs.

Keywords

Social World Stock Knowledge Unique Component Important Country Social Belief 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Garfinkel, Harold. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Gladwell, Malcolm. (2005). Blink. New York, NY: Little Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  3. Handel, Warren. (1982). Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Husserl, Edmund. (1965, originally published 1936). Phenomenology and the Crisis of Western Philosophy. New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  5. Husserl, Edmund. (1969, originally published in 1913). Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. London: Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Kurke, Lance B. (2004). The Wisdom of Alexander the Great. NY: AMACOM.Google Scholar
  7. Lave, Charles A. and March, James G. (1975). An Introduction to Models in the Social Sciences. New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  8. Mead, George Herbert (1934). Mind, Self, and Society. Edited by Charles W. Morris. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Natonson, Maurice. (1968). Philosophy and Social Science. In Literature, Philosophy and Social Science. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  10. Peters, Tom. (2003). Re-imagine!. London: Doring Kindserley.Google Scholar
  11. Schutz, Alfred. (1967, originally published in 1932). The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Shaver, Kelly G. (1975). An Introduction to Attribution Processes. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.Google Scholar
  13. Simmel, Georg. (1955, originally published in 1922). Conflict and the Web of Group Affiliations. Glencoe, IL: Free PressGoogle Scholar
  14. Stryker, Sheldon. (1980). Symbolic Interactionism. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/ Cummings.Google Scholar
  15. Turner, Jonathan. (1978). The Structure of Sociological Theory, revised edition. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.Google Scholar
  16. Weber, Max. (1947). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lance B. Kurke
    • 1
  1. 1.Carnegie Mellon UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations