Abstract
The ability to innovate has become a crucial prerequisite of strong organizations as well as economies. Theoretical and empirical evidence demonstrates that developing countries with effective innovation policies and well-functioning national innovation systems are better positioned to close the development gap and improve their competitiveness. Turkey started discussing the innovation subject from the policy perspective in the mid-1990s, during the same time as the EU, where—at that time—a wide-ranging debate was stimulated by the “Green Paper on Innovation,” and the government defined its main objective in this topic as “the establishment of the National Innovation System that would enable systematic operation of the whole institutions and mechanisms required to carry out scientific and technological research and development activities and to transform the results of those activities into economic and social benefit.” However, until today, this goal has not been fully achieved and the innovation performance remained below the desired level. Although innovation performance is low, demand for innovative products/services, one of the prime drivers of innovation, is very high in Turkey. Departing from this paradox, this chapter discusses how to increase the innovative capabilities of the Turkish firms in favor of a competitive economy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Schumpeter J. A. (1990) The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle. In: Casson M. (ed) Entrepreneurship, Edward Elgar Publishing, Hants.
Drucker P. F. (1985) Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc., New York.
Amabile T. M. (1983) The Social Psychology of Creativity. Springer-Verlag, New York.
World Bank (2006) Turkey Country Economic Memorandum Promoting Sustained Growth and Convergence with the European Union http://www.worldbank.org.tr/ cem2006 Cited 10 Sep 2007.
OECD (2001) A New Economy? The Changing Role of Innovation and Information Technology in Growth. OECD, Paris http://www.oecd.org/document/ 62/0,3343,en_2649_33703_2675198 _1_1_1_1,00.html.
Lundvall B. A. (2000) Systems of Innovation: Growth, Competitiveness and Employment. In: Edquist C and M McKelvey (Eds), Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.
World Bank (1993) The making of the East Asia miracle http://www.worldbank.org/ html/dec/Publications/Bulletins/PRBvol4no4.html. Cited 10 Sep 2007.
Hobday M. (1995) Innovation in East Asia: The Challenge to Japan. Edward Elgar Publishing, Hants.
Stiglitz J. (1996) Some Lessons from the East Asian Miracle. http://wbro.\break oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/11/2/151 Cited 10 Sep 2007.
Cakmakci U. M. (2005) The context of innovation and the role of the state. In: Trott P. (ed) Innovation Management and New Product Development, 3rd edn. Pearson Education Limited, England.
OECD (2004) Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Turkey: Issues and Policies. Small and Medium Enterprises Outlook, OECD, Paris. http://www.oecd.org/ dataoecd/5/11/31932173.pdf. Cited 10 Sep 2007.
Gurel E., Gumuşluoglu L., Guney S. (2003) An Analysis of Entrepreneurship by Demographics and Sectoral Composition in Turkey and A Comparison with the European Union. Boğaziçi Journal 17(1): 75–104.
Elci, S. (2004) European Trend Chart on Innovation: Annual Innovation Policy for Turkey, September 2003-August 2004. European Commission. http://www. proinno-europe.eu/docs/reports/documents/Country_Report_Turkey_2006.pdf Cited 10 Sep 2007.
The Economist, June 7, 2007 http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm? story_id=9302662. Cited 5 August 2007.
Niosi, J. (2002) National systems of innovations are “x-efficient” (and x-effective): Why some are slow learners. Research Policy 31: 291–302.
Elci, S. (Forthcoming report) INNO-Policy TrendChart - Policy Trends and Appraisal Report: Turkey, 2007. European Commission http://www.proinno-europe.eu/index.cfm?fuseaction=country.showCountry&topicID=263&parent ID=52&ID=41.
Porter M. E. (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations. The Free Press, New York.
EC (2005) Population Innovation Readiness Study: Innobarometer http://www. eurosfaire.prd.fr/7pc/doc/1125061030_innovation_readiness_final_2005.pdf. Cited 10 August 2007.
Turkish Daily News, October 13, 2007 http://www.turkishdailynews.com.tr. Cited 16 Oct 2007.
Turkey Financial News, April 13, 2007 http://www.turkeyfinancial.com/news/2007. Cited 20 Sep 2007.
UN (2006) Information Economy Report. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/sdteecb20061_en.pdf. Cited 11 Oct 2007.
Lemoine F., Ünal-Kesenci D (2003) Trade and Technology Transfers: A Comparative Study of Turkey, India and China. CEPII, Working Paper, No. 2003 – 16 http://www.cepii.fr/anglaisgraph/workpap/pdf/2003/wp03-16.pdf. Cited 9 Sep 2007.
EC (2007) Key Figures 2007 On Science, Technology and Innovation: Towards A European Knowledge Area. http://ec.europa.eu/invest-in-research/ pdf/kf_2007_prepub_en.pdf. Cited 15 Sep 2007.
OECD (2005) Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2005. OECD, Paris. http://www.oecd.org/sti/scoreboard. Cited 12 Sep 2007.
EC (2006) European Innovation Scoreboard 2006: Comparative Analysis of Innovation Performance Pro Inno Europe Inno Metrics. http://www.proinno-europe.eu/doc/EIS2006_final.pdf. Cited 1 Sep 2007.
World Bank (2007) Knowledge Assessment Methodology (KAM). http://www. worldbank.org/kam. Cited 10 Sep 2007.
Goldberg I., Trajtenberg M., Jaffe A. et al (2006) Public Financial Support For Commercial Innovation: Europe and Central Asia Knowledge Economy Study Part I. Europe and Central Asia Chief Economist’s Regional Working Paper Series vol 1, no.1 http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTECA/Resources/ KE_Study_Final.pdf. Cited 3 Sep 2007.
WEF (2006–2007) Global Competitiveness Index, 2006–2007, World Economic Forum http://www.weforum.org/en/initiatives/gcp/Global%20Competitiveness %20Report/PastReports /index.htm.
8th Five Year Development Plan of Turkey. The State Planning Organization, June 2000 http://ekutup.dpt.gov.tr/plan/viii/plan8.pdf. Cited 5 Oct 2007.
Oral G. (2006) Creativity of Turkish Prospective Teachers. Creativity Research Journal 18(1): 65–73.
TrendChart Newsletter, June 2006, European Commission http://www.proinno- europe.eu/index.cfm?fuseaction=wiw.informations&page=detail&ID=1646 Cited 10 Oct 2007.
EC (2006) 2006 Innobarometer on clusters’ role in facilitating innovation in Europe: Analytical Report. http://cordis.europa.eu/innovation-policy/studies/ gen_study17.htm. Cited 8 August 2007.
Elci S. (2007) Assessment of Venture Capital Environment in Turkey. Report to the World Bank.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gumusluoglu, L., Elçi, Ş. (2009). How to Address the Turkish Paradox of Innovation to Build a Competitive Economy?. In: Aydogan, N. (eds) Innovation Policies, Business Creation and Economic Development. International Studies In Entrepreneurship, vol 21. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79976-6_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79976-6_15
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-79975-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-79976-6
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)