Innovation and Restructuring: The Conceptual Dilemma in the Continuous Process Improvement

  • UĞur Zel
Part of the International Studies In Entrepreneurship book series (ISEN, volume 21)


The relationship between “continuous improvement,” “reengineering,” and “innovation” has been a heavily debated topic in recent years. However, these concepts (approaches) have interlaced characteristics, but strongly differ in focus. Processes and systems have parts that perform the work of the system and relations among the parts that define how the work should be performed. In the frame of “System Theory,” changes in the relations of the system represent the largest potential for improvement as the relations provide the structure in which the system functions.

This chapter examines the differences between the meanings and applications of the concepts innovation and reengineering by using different researchers’ views. Articles and books written on these concepts are used to collect data to form the theoretical background of the chapter. As a conclusion, some evolutions are made to reveal the differences between the concepts in the frame of case studies.


Business Process Customer Satisfaction Continuous Improvement Total Quality Management Innovation Concept 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barker, J. A. (1992). The Future Edge, New York: William Morrow and Co.Google Scholar
  2. Boyd, J. (1998). The Middle Way, Computing Japan, Vol. 5, Issue 6, p. 48.Google Scholar
  3. Bushnell, R. (1995) When Do You Improve; When Do You Reengineer, Automatic I.D. News, Vol. 11, Issue 13, p. 49.Google Scholar
  4. Champy, J. (1995). Reengineering Management, Glasgow: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  5. Deming, E. (1993). The New Economics for Industry Government and Education, Cambridge: MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Deming, E. (1996). Out of Crises, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Hammer, M. (1995). Reengineering Revolution; A Handbook, New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  8. Hammer, M. Champy, J. (1995). Reengineering the Corporation, New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  9. Imai, M. (1986). Kaizen; The Key to Japan’s Competitive Success, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  10. Kavrakoglu, İ. (1998). Total Quality Management, İstanbul: Kalder Pub.Google Scholar
  11. King, I. (1996). The Road to Continuous Improvement: BPR and Project Management, IIE Solutions, Vol. 28, Issue 10, p. 22, October.Google Scholar
  12. MacDonald B. (1996). Successful Reengineering. Corporate Report, Vol. 27, Issue 5, p. 64, May.Google Scholar
  13. Martensen, A. (1999). Integrating Business Excellence and Innovation Management, Total Quality Management, July, p. 627.Google Scholar
  14. OECD Oslo Manual. (1998). Measuring Knowledge Management; A New Indicator Of Innovation In Enterprises, CPROST Report, June.Google Scholar
  15. Peppard, J. (1999). Benchmarking, Process Re-engineering and Strategy: Some Focusing Frameworks, Human Systems Management, Vol. 18, Issue 3/4, p. 297.Google Scholar
  16. Tsuchiya, S. (1998). Simulation/Gaming as an Essential Enabler of Organizational Change, Simulation and Gaming, Vol. 29, Issue 4, p. 400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tushman, M., Nadler, D. (1996). Organizing for Innovation, (Ed) K. Starkey, How Organizations Learn, London: International Thomson Business Press.Google Scholar
  18. Webber, R. (1975). Management, Basic Elements of Managing Organizations, Chicago, IL: Richard Irwin Inc.Google Scholar
  19. Yeomans, M. (1996). Achieving Breakthrough Improvement Through BPR, Armed Forces Comptroller, Vol. 41, Issue 1, p. 7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • UĞur Zel

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations