Financing for Turkish Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: SMEs Restructuring, Business Plans, and Value-Adding Chains as Tools

  • Klaus Jurgens
Part of the International Studies In Entrepreneurship book series (ISEN, volume 21)


Before debating the financing for Turkish small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), we must understand SMEs. Likewise, Turkish SMEs must learn to understand the concept behind “technical readiness.” Their obstacles may be linked to not having enough money as reserve, not being able to offer collateral, not producing anything that has a “high value,” not having a turnover or balance sheet that is convincing to the local bank manager, or in the case of start-ups, not having a product idea or the required own investment to get going. When talking about innovation, financing is the key obstacle. First, SMEs need to be trained about how to obtain funding and from where; the need for training about how to develop a sound and profitable product or service idea; and training about how to prepare a professional business plan.

The originality of this contribution is to link SMEs financing with company restructuring, as I argue that without a streamlined organization, even SMEs will not be able to make good use of the financing once obtained. I argue further that without the promise of restructuring, many lenders will be hesitant to give the funds. On top of that, every start-up must consider their venture as an organization, too. However, SME restructuring differs greatly from that of larger companies as will be explored in detail.


European Union Family Business Business Plan Breakeven Point Exit Strategy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. ABGS (2006), Screening Chapter 20: Enterprise and Industrial Policy, Agenda Item III: SME and Enterprise Policies, Country Session: The Republic of Turkey, May 4–5, 2006, p. 32.Google Scholar
  2. ABGS (2007), EU Accession Negotiations, Screening Process (as published on the ABGS website, English version, Turkey – EU Relations, Screening Process), March 13, 2007.
  3. Arrow, K. J. (1996) The Ten Arrow Principles, in: Kovacsy, Z., and Orban, K., Regulatory Impact Analysis – A Comprehensive Approach – Summary, (November 18, 2005), Ministry of Justice, Department of Impact Analysis, Deregulation and Registration of Law, Republic of Hungary, p. 4.Google Scholar
  4. Clark, G. L., Feldman, M. P., Gertler, M. S. (2000). The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  5. CBI (2005), Center for the promotion of imports from developing countries of The Netherlands, EU Market Survey 2005, Organic Food Products, p. 111.Google Scholar
  6. Cheng K. F., Chen, L.C. (2006), Fitting logistic regression models with contaminated case–control data, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 136(12), 4147–4160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Courtney, J. (2006), Introduction to Business Plan Drafting, Beer and Partners,
  8. DTI (Department of Trade and Industry), Small Business Service, NOP Social & Political, Household Survey of Entrepreneurship 2003, Executive Summary.Google Scholar
  9. European Commission (1985), White Paper: Completing the Internal Market, COM (85)310.Google Scholar
  10. European Commission (2002), Descriptive Report on the simplification and modernization of VAT obligations for the European Commission, PriceWaterhouseCoopers.Google Scholar
  11. European Commission (2005a), The new SME definition – User Guide and model declaration, Enterprise and Industry Publications, European Commission,, in effect as from January 1, 2005.
  12. European Commission (2005b), Commission Staff Working Paper, The activities of the European Union for small and medium-sized enterprises: SME Envoy Report, SEC(2005)170, February 8, 2005, p. 8.Google Scholar
  13. European Commission (2006), VAT Rates applied in the Member States of the European Community, Situation February 1, 2006, DOC/1803/2006-EN, DG Taxation and Customs Union, Tax Policy, VAT and other turnover taxes.Google Scholar
  14. Işik, S. (2007), Guest Lecture at Bilkent University (MAN 473), April 19, 2007.Google Scholar
  15. Jurgens, K. (2006), Why Regulatory Impact Analysis can Overcome Obstacles Turkey Faces on her Way to Europe?, Insight Turkey 8(3), 121–125.Google Scholar
  16. OECD (2005), OECD Conference on Global Tourism Growth, Korea, September 6–7, 2005.Google Scholar
  17. Pereira, F. (2006), Analytical examination of the Acquis Communautaire, Working Time Directive, DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities, Unit D2 – Labor Law and Work Organization, European Commission.Google Scholar
  18. Porter, M. E. (1998), Clusters and the New Economics of Competition, Harvard Business Review, November–December.Google Scholar
  19. Porter, M. E. (2000), Location, Competition and Economic Development: Local Clusters in a Global Economy, Economic Development Quarterly, Vol 14(1), 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Verachtert, B., Niehoff, J. (2007), Research for the benefit of SME, EU Commission Brussels, as presented at a KOBI Workshop organized by TUBITAK at ITO, Istanbul on February 14, 2007.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Klaus Jurgens
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Business AdministrationBilkent UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations