Skip to main content

Innovation Strategies and Innovation Problems in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: An Empirical Study

  • Chapter
Innovation Policies, Business Creation and Economic Development

Part of the book series: International Studies In Entrepreneurship ((ISEN,volume 21))

Abstract

Innovation may become the basis of all competition in the future. Therefore, organizational theorists and managers alike have long shown more interest in the role of innovation in organizations, primarily due to the crucial role innovation plays in securing sustained competitive advantage. As organizations attempt to get competitive advantage, they develop and/or adopt new products, processes, techniques, or procedures. The aim of the study is to investigate the innovation activities in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs). The survey collected information about product and process innovation as well as organizational and marketing innovation. The research data were collected by the questionnaires applied in the cities of Gaziantep and Kahramanmaras. The data were analyzed by using the SPSS program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • AMA (2006). The Quest for Innovation, A Global Study of Innovation Management 2006–2016, American Management Association: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amit, R. and Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7), 493–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banbury, C. and Mitchell, W.(1995). The effect of introducing important incremental innovations on market share and business survival. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 161–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, I., Holroyd, P., and Poolton, J.,(1994). A Sphenomorphic Model for the Management of Innovation in a Complex Environment. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 15(7), 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BCG (2006). The Boston Consulting Group 2006 Senior Management Innovation Survey. Boston Consulting Group: Boston, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boer, H., Caffyn, S., Corso, M., Coughlan, P., Gieskes, J., Magnusson, M., Pavesi, S., and Ronchi, S.(2001). Knowledge and continuous innovation The CIMA methodology. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(4), 490–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, B.S.(1998). Innovation overview and future challenges. European Journal of Innovation Management, 1(1), 21–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daghfous, N., Petrof, J.V., and Pons, F.(1999). Values and adoption of innovations: a cross cultural study. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 16(4), 314–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte Research(2001). Creating Unique Customer Experiences: The Next Stage of Integrated Product Development. New York, NY: Deloitte Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte Research(2003). Move over Barcodes: Consumer Goods Firms Eye Radio Frequency ID. New York, NY: Deloitte Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECIS (2001). Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies, Research Design for the South African Innovation Survey. Working Paper 01.02.(L.A.G. Oerlemans, A.J. Buys and M.W. Pretorius) The Netherlands: Faculty of Technology Management, Eindhowen University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Innovation Scoreboard (2006). Comparative Analysis Of Innovation Performance, http://www.proinno-europe.eu/inno-metrics.html.

  • Glover, C. and Smethurst S. (2003). Great Ideas Wanted. People Management Online (April 8). Retrieved from www.peoplemanagement.co.uk.

  • Glynn, M.A.(1996). Innovative genius: a framework for relating individual and organizational intelligences to innovation. The Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1081–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G. (2006). The Why, What and How of Management Innovation. Harvard Business Review (February) 72–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S.(1996). New Product Development. London: Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbig, P., Golden, J.E., and Dunphy, S.(1994). The Relationship of Structure to Entrepreneurial and Innovative Success. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 12(9), 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M., Hoskisson, E., Johnson, R., Richard, A., and Moesel, D.D.(1996). The market for corporate control and firm innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1084–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innovation Survey (2000–2002). Statistical Service, 1444 Nicosia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jankowski, J.A. (2006). National and International Context for Innovation-Related Statistics. Arlington, Virginia: National Science Foundation Division of Science Resources Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johne, A.(1999). Successful market innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management 2(1), 6–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R.M.(1999). From spare change to real change: the social sector as Beta site for business innovation. Harvard Business Review, 77(3), 122–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koudal, P. and Coleman,G.C.(2005). Coordinating operations to enhance innovation in the global corporation. Strategy & Leadership, 33(4), 20–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee-Mortimer, A.(1995). Managing innovation and risk. World Class Design to Manufacture, 2(5), 38–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linder, J.C., Jarvenpaa, S., and Davenport, T.H.(2003). Towards an innovation sourcing strategy. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(4), 43–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEvily, S.K., Eisenhardt, K.M.M., and Prescott, J.E.(2004). The global acquisition, leverage, and protection of technological competencies. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8/9), 713–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MORI (2005). Innovation Survey 2005, Research Study Conducted for the CBI/Qinetiq, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, L.J.(1990). Management and Organizational Behavior (2nd. Edition). London: Pitman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • North Staffordshire UK DRIVE Partners(2006). SME Innovation Survey Analysis – North Staffordshire (UK) Partners, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Regan, N.(2004). Testing the homogeneity of SMEs. European Business Review, 16(1), 64–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Regan, N. and Ghobadian, A.(2005). Innovation in SMEs: the impact of strategic orientation and environmental perceptions. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 54(2), 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oerlemans, L.A.G., Buys, A.J., and Pretorius, M.W.(2001). Research Design for the South African Innovation Survey 2001, Working Paper 01.02, The Netherlands: Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, A.E.(2002). Tough-Minded Ways to Get Innovative. Harvard Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Permanent Innovation Survey (2007). Results of the Permanent Innovation Survey Summary Report, InnovationLabs in November/December 2007. www.innovationlabs.com

  • Peters, T.J. and Waterman, R.H.(1982). In Search of Excellence. Harper and Row: USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E.(1998). On Competition, Harvard Business School: Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C.K. and Ramaswamy, V.(2003). The new frontier of experience innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(4), 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P.W.(1999). Product innovation, product-market competition and persistent profitability in the US pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal, 20(7), 655–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, R.(1994). Towards the Fifth-generation Innovation Process. International Marketing Review, 11(1), 7–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumann, P. and Prestwood, D.(1994). Innovate!. USA: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P.M. and Carstedt, G.(2001). Innovating our way to the next industrial revolution. MIT Sloan Management Review, 42(2), 24–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • SGS Consulting (2002). SMEs: a national survey, March, SGS 5251/0302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoham, A. and Fieganbaum, A.(2002). Competitive determinants of organizational risk-taking attitude: the role of strategic reference points. Management Decision, 40(2), 127–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrader, C., Mulford, C. and Blackburn, V.(1989). Strategic and operational planning, uncertainty, and performance in small firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 27(4), 45–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • South African Innovation Survey (2005). South African Innovation Survey 2005 Highlights, Republic Of South Africa: Department Of Science And Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefik, M. and Stefik, P.(2004). Breakthrough Stories and Strategies of Radical Innovation. The MIT Press: London

    Google Scholar 

  • Strategic Direction(2004). Innovations: Innovation performance and the role of senior management. Strategic Direction, 20(5), 28–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terziovski, M.(2004). Assessment of Innovation Capability Models to Create Innovation Driven Companies, Australian Research Council Discovery Project, The University of Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Fourth Community Innovation Survey(CIS IV)(2004) Statistik Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M. and Jones, P.(1998). UK results from the 2nd Community Innovation Survey. Department of Trade and Industry: London

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. L.(2004). Innovation through people. Management Decision, 42(9), 1082–1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thunderbolt Thinking, Innovation Survey, www.thunderboltthinking.com, 15.09.2007.

  • Thomas M. and Jones P. UK 2nd Community Innovation Survey. Department of Trade and Industry, London, and Office For National Statistics:Newport.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau(2006). Measuring USA Innovative Activity, NSF/SRS Workshop on Advancing Measures of Innovations: Knowledge Flows, Business Metrics, and Measurement Strategies, Arlington, VA June 6–7, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, G.(1994). Innovate to Accumulate. World Class Design to Manufacture, 1(3), 11–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zott, C. (2003). Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intra industry differential firm performance: insights from a simulation study. Strategic Management Journal, 4(2), 97–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bakan, I., Yildiz, B. (2009). Innovation Strategies and Innovation Problems in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: An Empirical Study. In: Aydogan, N. (eds) Innovation Policies, Business Creation and Economic Development. International Studies In Entrepreneurship, vol 21. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79976-6_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics