Innovation Ability of Small Firms in Turkish Industrial Clusters: Ankara-Ivedik Industrial Region Case

  • Özlem Özkanli
  • Erdal Akdeve
Part of the International Studies In Entrepreneurship book series (ISEN, volume 21)


Research and development activities (R\&D) of small firms forming innovation have to be improved because of the insufficiency of financial, technical, and human resources. Innovation ability, which would actually support firm activity, is uncommon by small firms. This fact evidently causes a disadvantage for the small firms to compete in comparison with middle and large-scale firms. However, the disadvantaged situation of small firms arising from their economies of scale can be converted to an advantageous situation by forming a network of organizations in clusters. According to the literature reviewed, small firms within clusters improve in the field of innovation by intensity of communication and interaction, relative ease of information flow, ability of creating collective learning effects, and mutual budget for R\&D studies. This study examines the existence of this interaction among firms, as in the case of Ankara-Ivedik Organized Industrial District by a survey depending upon questionnaire information.


Product Development Small Firm Development Activity Binomial Test Knowledge Spillover 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bapista, R., Swann, P. (1998). Do firms in clusters innovate more? Research Policy, 27, 525–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bessant, J. (1999). The rise and fall of ‘Supernet’: a case study of technology transfer policy for smaller firms. Research Policy, 28, 6, 601–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boari, C., Odorici, V., Zamarian, M. (2003). Clusters and rivalry: does localization really matter? Scandinavian Journal of Management, 19, 467–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brusco, S., Pezzini, M. (1990). Small-scale enterprise in the ideology of the Italian Left. In: F. Pyke, G. Becattini, W. Sengenberger (1992), Industrial Districts and Inter-firm Co-operation in Italy, International Institute for Labour Studies. Geneva (142–159).Google Scholar
  5. Ceglie, G., Dini, M. (1999). SME cluster and network development in developing countries: the experience of UNIDO. UNIDO Private Sector Development Branch: Vienna.Google Scholar
  6. Cooke, P. (2001). Strategies for Regional Innovation Systems: Learning Transfer and Applications. Prepared for UNIDO World Industrial Development Report (WIDR). Centre for Advanced Studies, Cardiff University: Cardiff CF10 3BB.Google Scholar
  7. EC (2003). European Commission, Third European Report on Science & Technology Indicators, Toward A Knowledge Based Economy. European Commission Directorate-General for Research Information and Communication Unit: BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  8. Fosfuri, A., Ronde, T. (2002). High-tech clusters, technology spillovers, and trade secret laws. Scandinavian Working Papers in Economics, No: 07-2002, Copenhagen Business School: Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  9. Hsien-Ta Wang et al. (2003)A survey for technological innovation in Taiwan. Journal of Data Science, 1, 337–360.Google Scholar
  10. Hoen, A. (2001). Clusters: determinants and effects. CPB Memorandum 17, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis. Available via http://www.
  11. KOSGEB (2007). Tekmer’ler ve Ar-Ge Destekleri, Available via www.teknokent. org.trGoogle Scholar
  12. Krugman, P. (1991). Geography and Trade. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Nadvi, K. (1995). Industrial Clusters and Networks: Case Studies of SME Growth and Innovation, Paper commissioned by the Small and Medium Industries Branch, UNIDO.Google Scholar
  14. OECD (2004). Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Turkey: Issues and Politics. OECD Publications. Available via
  15. Porter, M. (1998). Clusters and new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76 (6), 77–90.Google Scholar
  16. TOBB-KOSGEB (1997). KOBI Rehberi. Ankara: TOBB Genel Yayini.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Özlem Özkanli
    • 1
  • Erdal Akdeve
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ManagementAnkara UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations