Single Versus Multiple Sourcing: A Supply Risk Management Perspective

  • Constantin Blome
  • Michael Henke
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 124)

The general trend to focus more on core competencies and the ongoing shift of value creation to suppliers has caused the dependency of purchasing companies on their suppliers to grow (Ellram and Birou 1995; Boutellier and Corsten 2000). Together with this development, more and more cooperative relationships with suppliers have evolved, and as a consequence more single sourcing relationships have emerged: e.g., strategic supplier relationships, strategic partnerships, and strategic alliances. This leads to the fact that the purchasing companies are confronted with new risks involving the risk of supply disruption. These risks are often seen as a risk of single sourcing.

Single and multiple sourcing are the more frequently discussed approaches in Supply Risk Management (Khan et al. 2007). However the risk analysis of both these approaches follows stereotypes. Whether single or multiple sourcing reduces the risk, is disputed. Furthermore, one other important fact is often missing: in many cases, there is no opportunity to choose between these two alternatives. The discussion of these two approaches will be developed in the remainder of this chapter, employing a differentiated view of risk to develop the basis for a more contingency-based method for managing the associated risks. It is subsequently argued that it is necessary to integrate this method into the process model of Supply Risk Management to enable a sustainable and company-wide Risk Management approach.


Supply Chain Management Supply Management Supply Disruption Supply Relationship Supply Risk 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anonymous 1998 Supply failure won’t change Ford policy. Professional Engineering June 1998.Google Scholar
  2. Arnolds H, Heege F and Tussing W 2001 Materialwirtschaft und Einkauf. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  3. Atkinson W 2003 Supply chain risk management. Riding out global challenges. Purchasing 132 (14):43-47.Google Scholar
  4. Baily P 1994 Purchasing Principles and Management. London.Google Scholar
  5. Basler Ausschuss für Bankenaufsicht 1994 Richtlinien für das Risikomanagement im Derivativgeschäft. Basel.Google Scholar
  6. Boutellier R and Corsten D 2000 Basiswissen Beschaffung. Munich and Vienna.Google Scholar
  7. Büschemann KH 2005 Eine Dieselpumpe bringt Autohersteller in Verlegenheit. Süddeutsche Zeitung 04.02.2005:19.Google Scholar
  8. Christopher M and Peck H 2004 The five principles of supply chain resilience. Logistics Europe 12(1):16-21.Google Scholar
  9. Diederichs M, Form S and Reichmann T 2004 Controlling-Special, Standard zum Risikomanagement. Controlling 16:189-198Google Scholar
  10. Dobler DW and Burt DN 1984 Purchasing and Supply Management, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Ellram LM 1991 Supply chain management: the industrial organization perspective. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 21(1):13-22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellram LM and Birou LM 1995 Purchasing for bottom line impact: improving the organization through strategic procurement. Chicago.Google Scholar
  13. Gadde LE and Hakansson H 1993 Professional Purchasing. London, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Gleißner W 2005 Beschaffung und Einkauf. Das Management von Beschaffungsrisiken eine Einführung. In: Gleißner W (ed) Risikomanagement im Unternehmen, Praxisratgeber für die Einführung und Umsetzung. Augsburg pp 4-14.Google Scholar
  15. Henke M, Jahns C and Geisler P 2006 Das China-Risiko. In: Online-Portal forum gelb August 2006.Google Scholar
  16. Jahns C 2003 In interview: Vom Einkauf zum Supply Management. Es gibt nichts Gutes, außer man tut es. Beschaffung Aktuell 31(10):30.Google Scholar
  17. Jahns C 2004 Der Paradigmenwechsel vom Einkauf zum Supply Management (Teil 14). Es gibt ihn, es gibt ihn nicht, es gibt ihn, ... Beschaffung Aktuell 32(8):29.Google Scholar
  18. Khan O, Burnes B and Christopher M 2007 Risk and supply chain management - creating a research agenda. Currently in review, see http://www.som.cranfield groups/scrf/Articles.asp.
  19. Lonsdale C 1999 Effectively managing vertical supply relationships: a risk management model for outsourcing. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 4:176-83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Monczka R, Trent R and Handfield R 1998 Purchasing and Supply Chain Management. CincinattiGoogle Scholar
  21. Newman RG 1989 Single sourcing: Short-term savings versus long-term problems. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 25(2):20-25.Google Scholar
  22. Nishiguchi T and Beaudet A 1998 Case study: the Toyota Group and the Aisin Fire. Sloan Management Review 40(Fall):49-59.Google Scholar
  23. Pilling BK and Zhang L 1992 Cooperative exchange: rewards and risks. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 28(2):2-9.Google Scholar
  24. Rogler S 2001 Management von Beschaffungs- und Absatzrisiken. In: Götze U et al. (eds) Risikomanagement. Heidelberg pp 211-240.Google Scholar
  25. Smeltzer LR and Siferd SP 1998 Proactive supply management: the management of risk. International Journal of Purchasing and Material Management 34(1):38-45.Google Scholar
  26. The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, 2004 Enterprise Risk Management - Integrated Framework. Jersey City.Google Scholar
  27. Treleven, M and Schweikhart SB 1988 A risk/benefit analysis of sourcing strategies: single versus multiple sourcing. Journal of Operations Management 7(4):93-114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Weerd E 2003 Alles unter Kontrolle. Risikomanagement. Initiativbanking, 2003(3):21.Google Scholar
  29. Wildemann H 2006 Risikomanagement und Rating. Munich.Google Scholar
  30. Zsidisin GA 2003 Managerial perceptions of supply risk. The Journal of Supply Chain Management. A Global Review of Purchasing and Supply 39(1):14-25.Google Scholar
  31. Zsidisin GA 2005 Approaches for Managing Price Volatility. In: 5th International Research Seminar on Risk and the Supply Chain. Centre for Logistics and Supply Chain Management, School of Management, Cranfield University 12th September 2005.Google Scholar
  32. Zsidisin GA and Ellram LM 2003 An agency theory investigation of supply risk management. The Journal of Supply Chain Management 39(3):15-27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Constantin Blome
    • 1
  • Michael Henke
  1. 1.Supply Management Institute (SMI)European Business School EBSOestrich-WinkelGermany

Personalised recommendations