Using Simulation to Investigate Supply Chain Disruptions

  • Steven A. Melnyk
  • Alexander Rodrigues
  • Gary L. Ragatz
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 124)

Managers and researchers are coming to realize that Supply Chain Disruptions (SCDs) constitute a real and significant threat – a threat that has to be better understood. However, the challenge facing many researchers is that of developing an understanding of these disruptions, what causes them, what factors moderate or influence the disruptions, and of identifying, and comparing alternative strategies and policies for dealing with such disruptions.

This chapter introduces such an approach – computer-based discrete event simulation. Simulation has long been used in Operations Management, Logistics, and Supply Management to study problems such as scheduling (job sequencing, production scheduling, order release, delivery reliability), capacity planning, process design-service, cellular manufacturing, and resource allocation (Shafer and Smunt 2004). It is now being used as a vehicle for studying supply chain related problems (Bowersox and Closs 1989; Levy 1995; Parlar 1997; Ridall et al. 2000; van der Vorst et al. 2000; Holweg and Bicheno 2002; Shafer and Smunt 2004; Terzi and Cavalieri 2004; Venkateswaran and Son 2004; Allwood and Lee 2005).


Supply Chain Outlier Detection Discrete Event Simulation Bullwhip Effect Supply Risk 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allwood, J.M., and Lee, J.H. (2005). The design of an agent for modeling supply chain network dynamics. International Journal of Production Research, 43(22), 4875-4898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anonymous (2005). Business: When lightning strikes; business continuity planning. The Economist, 377(8450), 83.Google Scholar
  3. Anupindi, R., and Akella, R. (1993). Diversification under supply uncertainty. Management Science, 39(8), 944-963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berger, P.D., Gerstenfeld, A., and Zeng, A.Z. (2004). How many suppliers are best? A decision analysis approach. Omega, 32(1), 9-15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowersox, D.J., and Closs, D.J. (1989). Simulation in logistics: A review of present practice and a look to the future. Journal of Business Logistics, 10(1), 133-148.Google Scholar
  6. Box, G.E.P., and Tiao, G.C. (1965). A change in level of a non-stationary time series. Biometrika, 52, 181-192.Google Scholar
  7. Box, G.E.P., and Tiao, G.C. (1975). Intervention analysis with applications to economics and environmental problems. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 355-365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carter, C.R., and Jennings, M.M. (2004). The role of purchasing in corporate social responsibility: A structural equation analysis. Journal of Business Logistics, 25(1), 145-186.Google Scholar
  9. Carter, J.R., and Vickery, S.K. (1988). Managing volatile exchange rates in international purchasing. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 24(4), 13-20.Google Scholar
  10. Chatfield, D.C., Kim, J.G., Harrison, T.P., and Hayya, J.C. (2004). The bullwhip effect impact of stochastic lead time, information quality, and information sharing: A simulation study. Production and Operations Management, 13(4), 340-353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, C., and Liu, L.-M. (1993a). Joint estimation of model parameters and outlier effects in time series. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88(421), 284-297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen, C., and Liu, L.-M. (1993b). Forecasting time series with outliers. Journal of Forecasting, 12(1), 13-35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chopra, S., and Sodhi, M.S. (2004). Managing risk to avoid supply chain breakdown. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(1), 53-61.Google Scholar
  14. Crowe, T.J., Fong, P.M., Bauman, T.A., and Zayas-Castro, J.L. (2002). Quantitative risk level estimation of business process reengineering efforts. Business Process Management Journal, 8(5), 490-511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Demchak, C. (1996). Tailored precision armies in fully networked battlespace: High reliability organizational dilemmas in the information age. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 4(2), 93-103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fine, C.H. (1998). Clockspeed: Winning industry control in the age of temporary advantage. Reading, MA: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
  17. Flynn, B.B., Sakakibara, S., and Schroeder, R.G. (1995). Relationship between jit and tqm: Practices and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1325-1360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hallikas, J., Virolainen, V.-M., and Tuominen, M. (2002). Risk analysis and assessment in network environments: A dyadic case study. International Journal of Production Economics, 78(1), 45-55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hendricks, K.B., and Singhal, V.R. (2003). The effect of supply chain glitches on shareholder wealth. Journal of Operations Management, 21(5), 501-522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hendricks, K.B., and Singhal, V.R. (2005). Association between supply chain glitches and operating performance. Management Science, 51(5), 695-711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holweg, M., and Bicheno, J. (2002). Supply chain simulation a tool for education, enhancement and endeavour. International Journal of Production Economics, 78(2), 163-175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Imai, M. (1986). Kaizen: The key to Japanese competitive success. New York, NY: Random House Business Division.Google Scholar
  23. Imai, M. (1997). Gemba kaizen: A commonsense low-cost approach to management. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  24. Juttner, U. (2005). Supply chain risk management: Understanding the business requirements from a practitioner perspective. International Journal of Logistics Management, 16 (1), 120-141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kazantzis, C.I., and Tessaromatis, N.P. (2001). Volatility in currency markets. Managerial Finance, 27(6), 1-22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kelton, W.D., Sadowski, R.P., and Sturrock, D.T. (2004). Simulation with arena. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  27. Kleindorfer, P.R., and Saad, G.H. (2005). Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Production and Operations Management, 14(1), 53-68.Google Scholar
  28. Law, A.M., and Kelton, W.D. (2000). Simulation modeling and analysis. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  29. Lee, H.L., and Whang, S. (2005). Higher supply chain security with lower cost: Lessons from total quality management. International Journal of Production Economics, 96(3), 289-300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee, H.L., Padmanabhan, V., and Whang, S. (1997). Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Science, 43(4), 546-558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Levy, D.L. (1995). International sourcing and supply chain stability. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(2), 343-360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Levy, D.L. (1997). Lean production in an international supply chain. Sloan Management Review, 38(2), 94-102.Google Scholar
  33. Liker, J.K., ed., Becoming lean: Inside stories of U.S. Manufacturers (Portland, OR: Productivity Press, 1997).Google Scholar
  34. Liu, L. (2005). Time series analysis and forecasting. River Forest, IL: Scientific Computing Associate Corporation.Google Scholar
  35. Liu, L., and Hudak, G.B. (2004). Forecasting and time series analysis using the sca statistical system. River Forest, IL: Scientific Computing Associate Corporation.Google Scholar
  36. Magnan, G.M., and Fawcett, S.E. (2006). Supplier codes of conduct: Organizational and implementation challenges. Proceedings of the 17th Annual North American Research Symposium on Purchasing and Supply Management, San Diego, CA,Google Scholar
  37. Mitchell, V.-W. (1995). Organizational risk perception and reduction: A literature review. British Journal of Management, 6(2), 115-133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ohno, T. (1988). Toyota production system: Beyond large-scale production. Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press.Google Scholar
  39. Pankratz, A. (1991). Forecasting with dynamic regression models. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  40. Parlar, M. (1997). Continuous review inventory problem with random supply interruptions. European Journal of Operational Research, 99(2), 366-385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Peck, H. (2005). Drivers of supply chain vulnerability: An integrated framework. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 35(3/4), 210-232.Google Scholar
  42. Prokop, D. (2004). Smart and safe borders: The logistics of inbound cargo security. International Journal of Logistics Management, 15(2), 65. 122 Steven A. Melnyk et al.Google Scholar
  43. Ridall, C.E., Bennet, S., and Tipi, N.S. (2000). Modeling the dynamics of supply chains. International Journal of Systems Science, 31(8), 969-976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Seifert, R.W., Thonemann, U.W., and Hausman, W.H. (2004). Optimal procurement strategies for online spot markets. European Journal of Operational Research, 152(3), 781-799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shafer, S.M., and Smunt, T.L. (2004). Empirical simulation studies in operations management: Context, trends, and research opportunities. Journal of Operations Management, 22(4), 345-354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sheffi, Y. (2005). The resilient enterprise. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  47. Sodhi, M.S. (2005). Managing demand risk in tactical supply chain planning for a global consumer electronics company. Production and Operations Management, 14(1), 69-79.Google Scholar
  48. Terzi, S., and Cavalieri, S. (2004). Simulation in the supply chain context: A survey. Computers in Industry, 53(1), 3-16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tsay, R.S. (1988). Outliers, level shifts, and variance changes in time series. Journal of Forecasting, 7(1), 1-20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. van der Vorst, J.G.A.J., Beulens, A.J.M., and van Beek, P. (2000). Modeling and simulating multi echelon food systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 122(2), 354-366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. van der Zee, D.J., and van der Vorst, J.G.A.J. (2005). A modeling framework for supply chain simulation: Opportunities for improved decision making*. Decision Sciences, 36 (1), 65-95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Venkateswaran, J., and Son, Y.J. (2004). Impact of modeling approximations in supply chain analysis an experimental study. International Journal of Production Research, 42 (15), 2971-2992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wei, W.W.S. (1990). Time series analysis: Univariate and multivariate methods. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  54. Womack, J.P., and Jones, D.T. (2003). Lean thinking: Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  55. Zsidisin, G.A. (2003). Managerial perceptions of supply risk. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 39(1), 14-26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zsidisin, G.A. (2005). “Managing commodity spend in turbulent times,” CAPS Center for Strategic Supply Research.Google Scholar
  57. Zsidisin, G.A., and Ellram, L.M. (2003). An agency theory investigation of supply risk management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 39(3), 15-27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zsidisin, G.A., Ellram, L.M., Carter, J.R., and Cavinato, J.L. (2004). An analysis of supply risk assessment techniques. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 34(5), 397-413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zsidisin, G.A., Melnyk, S.A., and Ragatz, G.L. (2005). An institutional theory perspective of business continuity planning for purchasing and supply management. International Journal of Production Research, 43(16), 3401-3415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven A. Melnyk
    • 1
  • Alexander Rodrigues
  • Gary L. Ragatz
  1. 1.The Department of Supply Chain Management, The Eli Broad Graduate School of ManagementMichigan State UniversityEast Lansing

Personalised recommendations