Advertisement

Assessing Risks in Projects and Processes

  • Barbara Gaudenzi
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 124)

The environment of today’s organizations is characterized by continuous changes at an ever-increasing speed. Competition rules change all the time and organizations need to be more flexible as they rise to the challenge of becoming “better, faster and cheaper”. This increasingly more dynamic environment is characterized by a huge number of risks, which exist both inside the company, throughout its processes and projects, and at the network level. For this reason, managers should focus their attention on the achievement of the specific objectives of each process and project, depending on the priority that the top management assigns to all of them. However, a best practice gap still exists for analysing risks in projects and processes utilising a systemic perspective.

The purpose of this chapter is to explain and evaluate the new challenges faced by supply chain management in adopting such a process- and project-based orientation within the supply chain. The intended outcome is to offer some suggestions on how to assess and manage supply chain risks that otherwise might jeopardize the achievement of supply chain goals whilst, also ensuring profitable supply chain management. First, the chapter will describe the drivers for success in projects and processes. These drivers are: the focus on the objectives, the implementation of change management, the definition of the responsibilities and finally the measurement of performance and risk. These drivers might represent the starting point for the definition of the risk assessment method. It means that the assessment of risks in processes and projects might comprise in its steps these drivers for success. Finally, the chapter will describe the steps comprising the assessment of risks in processes and projects.

Keywords

Supply Chain Supply Chain Management Risk Indicator Risk Assessment Method Supply Chain Member 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asbjørnslett BE (2003) Project Supply Chain Management: From Agile to Lean. Oslo, Norway. (Proceedings of the Conference Project Management: Dreams, Nightmares and Realities.)Google Scholar
  2. Bonaccorsi A, Lipparini A (1994) Strategic Partnership in New Product Development: An Italian Case Study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11: 134-145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowersox DJ, Closs DJ, Cooper MB (2002) Supply Chain Logistics Management. McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Chapman C, Ward S (1997) Project Risk Management. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
  5. Christopher M (1998) Logistics and Supply Chain Management: Strategies for Reducing Cost and Improving Services. Financial Time Prentice Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Christopher M, Juettner U, Peck H (2003) Supply Chain Risk Management: Outlining an Agenda for Future Research. International Journal of Logistics: Research & Applications, 6: 197-210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Debenham J (2001) Agent-Based Process Management. Melbourne, Australia. (Proceedings of the 11th Annual Symposium INCOSE.)Google Scholar
  8. Flannes SW, Levin G (2001) People Skills for Project Managers. Management Concepts. The United States of America.Google Scholar
  9. Gaudenzi B, Borghesi A (2006) Managing Risks in the Supply Chain Using the AHP Method. International Journal of Logistics Management, 17: 114-136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gaudenzi B, Gentile I (2006) L’analisi dei Rischi di Progetto Nella Supply Chain: 3D Long Range Early Warning Radar. Roma, Italy (Proceedings of the Project Risk & Opportunity Management forum).Google Scholar
  11. Gregory IC, Rawling, SB (2003) Profit From Time: Speed Up Business Improvement by Implementing Time Compression. New York, Palgrave.Google Scholar
  12. Lereim J (2002) Leadership Challenges in Projects with Moving Targets (Proceedings IRNOP 5 International Research Network of Organising Projects, Renesse, Zeeland, The Netherlands, 28-31 May 2002).Google Scholar
  13. Lundin RA, Söderholm A, Wilson T (2001) On the Conceptualization of Time in Projects. Uppsala, Sweden. (Proceedings of the 16th Nordic Conference).Google Scholar
  14. Marsh and McLennan Companies (2005) MMC Reports 2005 Results. www.mmc.com.
  15. Mentzer JT (2001). Supply Chain Management. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
  16. Nelson D, Mayo R, Moody P (1998) Powered by Honda: Developing Excellence in the Global Enterprise. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Obeng E (1996) All is Change, Financial Times. Prentice Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Omli LE, Svendsen EK, Karlsen JT (2003) Aiming for Higher Value Creation of Projects How to Secure Return on. Oslo, Norway. (Proceedings of the Conference Project Management: Dreams, Nightmares and Realities.)Google Scholar
  19. Otto A (2003) Supply Chain Event Management: Three Perspectives. International Journal of Logistics Management, 14: 1-15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Saaty T (1994) How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Interfaces, 24: 19-43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara Gaudenzi
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Business EconomicsUniversity of VeronaItaly

Personalised recommendations