The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) introduced the “Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework” in 2004. COSO is an independent private sector initiative that is dedicated to improving the quality of financial reporting through business ethics, effective internal controls, and corporate governance. Since the publishing of the COSO report in 1992, its recommendations have become a guideline for the evaluation of internal control systems. During the past decade several companies such as Worldcom, Enron, and Parmalat have experienced significant financial breakdowns. In response, COSO codified the close relationship between monitoring and risk management and further developed the COSO report with the ERM framework. The reliability of reporting was therefore expanded from merely financial reporting to all internal and external company reports in order to improve monitoring. “Business reporting” thus replaces “financial reporting” to better supply shareholders and stakeholders with the information they need. This strategic orientation has been added to the framework as a target category (first dimension of the ERM model, please see Fig. 11.1). Furthermore, the framework now includes the necessary components for risk management (second dimension of the ERM model). As a result, the ERM model brings together the topics of both monitoring and risk management systems.
The purpose of this chapter is to introduce and describe the development of an ERM-compliant Supply Risk Management approach and how the respective processes can help companies better manage supply (chain) risks. This is also intended to help answer the question if ERM is a good point to start the further development of an integrated and process-oriented Supply Risk Management approach.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Büschemann, K.-H., 2005. Eine Dieselpumpe bringt Autohersteller in Verlegenheit.
Zulieferer Bosch auf Fehlersuche/Kosten bei BMW etwa 20 Millionen Euro/ “Individuelle Werkstatt-Termine” bei Mercedes. Süddeutsche Zeitung from February 4, 2005, 19.
Ebers, M., Gotsch, W., 2002. 7. Instiutionenökonomische Theorien der Organisation. In: Kieser, A. (Ed.), Organisationstheorien. 5th Edition. Stuttgart, 199-251.
Eichler, H., Bungartz, O., 2004. Enterprise Risk Management—aktuelle Entwicklungen im Bereich unternehmensinterner Risiko- und Überwachungssysteme. Zeitschrift Interne Revision 39 (3), 108-114.
Henke, M., Jahns, Chr., 2005. The Importance of Supplier Performance Measurement and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for the Systematic Management of Supply Risks. In: Proceedings. 16th Annual North American Research Symposium on Purchasing and Supply Management. Tempe, Arizona. March 17-19, 2005, 219-239.
Hermanson, H. M., 2003. COSO: More relevant than ever. Internal Auditing 18 (4), 3-6.
Institut der Wirtschaftsprüfer in Deutschland e.V. (IDW), 2004. Comment Letter on the Enterprise Risk Management Framework. IDW-Fachnachrichten, 49-60.
Jahns, C., 2005. Supply Controlling. Diskussionen über den Zustand einer Disziplin. Controlling 17 (6), 349-358.
Labbé, M., Langen, D., 2004. General Management: Eine prozessorientierte Perspektive. Der Betrieb, 720-723.
Lück, W., 1998. Controlling. Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung zum Controlling in der Brauwirtschaft. Krefeld.
Lück, W., Henke, M., 2003. Risiko-Controlling in Wachstumsunternehmen. In: Achleitner, A.-K., Bassen, A. (Ed.), Controlling von jungen Unternehmen. Stuttgart, 281-298.
Matzenbacher, J., 2003. Risikominimierung bei der Beschaffung von Maschinen und Neuanlagen. In: Biedermann, H. (Ed.), Risikominimierung im Anlagenmanagement— Risiken beim Planen, Errichten und Betreiben von Anlagen. 17. Instandhaltungs-Forum. Reihe Praxiswissen für Ingenieure—Instandhaltung. Köln, 105-122.
The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, 2004. Enterprise Risk Management—Integrated Framework. Jersey City.
The Institute of Internal Auditors, 2004. Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing. Performance Standard 2110—Risk Management. Altamonte Springs. Effective January 1, 2004.
Wildemann, H., 2006. Risikomanagement und Rating. München.
Zsidisin, G. A., Ragatz, G. L., Melnyk, S. A., 2005. The DARK SIDE of Supply Chain Management. Supply Chain Management Review 9 (2), 46-52.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Henke, M. (2009). Enterprise and Supply Risk Management. In: Zsidisin, G.A., Ritchie, B. (eds) Supply Chain Risk. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 124. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79934-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79934-6_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-79933-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-79934-6
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)