Advertisement

Ultrasound-Guided Drainage Procedures for the Intensivist

  • Kathryn M. Tchorz
Chapter

Abstract

Ultrasound-guided procedures in the ICU have increased due to critical-care providers’ interest and expertise, the portability of newer ultrasound machines, and the availability of user-friendly percutaneous catheter kits. In addition, with the increasing demands for proper documentation – both for patient safety and financial reimbursement – ultrasound has emerged as an ideal imaging modality for several reasons. First, ultrasound is a portable imaging modality; with the advent of compact, hand-held machines, ultrasound is user-friendly and readily available, especially when caring for critically ill and injured patients. Second, ultrasound provides safe and painless imaging that may be readily utilized in pediatric and pregnant patients. Third, ultrasound imaging is easily repeatable; for example, residents, fellows, and nonphysician health-care providers (physician assistants and advanced practice nurses) within an academic environment can image, record, and submit copies for operator critique. The same idea holds true for a physician practicing in the private sector. Given our commitment to life-long learning in medicine, educational alliances with identified, local ultrasound experts may prove to be extremely rewarding.

Keywords

Cardiac Tamponade Pigtail Catheter Piezoelectric Crystal Pulseless Electrical Activity Bedside Ultrasound 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Nicolaou S, Talsky A, Khashoggi K, Venu V. Ultrasound-guided interventional radiology in critical care [review]. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(suppl 5):S186–S197.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Habib FA, McKenney MG. Surgeon-performed ultrasound in the ICU setting. Surg Clin N Am. 2004;84:1151–1179.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vignon P, Chastagner C, Berkane V, et al. Quantitative assessment of pleural effusion in critically ill patients by means of ultrasonography. Crit Care Med. 2005;33(8):1757–1763.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Roch A, Bojan M, Michelet P. Usefulness of ultrasonography in predicting pleural effusions >500 mls in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Chest. 2005;127:224–232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sisley AC, Rozycki GS, Ballard RB, Namias N, Salomone JP, Feliciano DV. Rapid detection of traumatic effusion using surgeon-performed ultrasonography. J Trauma. 1998;44:291–296.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rozycki GS, Pennington SD, Feliciano DV. Surgeon-performed ultrasound in the critical care setting: its use as an extension of the physical examination to detect pleural effusion. J Trauma. 2001;50:636–642.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pihlajamaa K, Bode MK, Puumalainen T, Lehtimäki A, Marjelund S, Tikkakoski T. Pneumothorax and the value of chest radiography after ultrasound-guided thoracocentesis. Acta Radiol. 2004;45(8):828–832.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mynarek G, Brabrand K, Jakobsen JA, Kolbenstvedt A. Complications following ultrasound-guided thoracocentesis. Acta Radiol. 2004;45(5):519–522.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tu C-Y, Hsu W-H, Hsia T-C, et al. Pleural effusions in febrile medical ICU patients: chest ultrasound study. Chest. 2004;126:1274–1280.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mayo PM, Goltz HR, Tafreshi M, Doelken P. Safety of ultrasound-guided thoracentesis in patient receiving mechanical ventilation. Chest. 2004;125:1059–1062.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Beck C. Two cardiac compression triads. JAMA. 1935;104:714–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Spodocl DH. Acute cardiac tamponade. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:648–690.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Seferovic PM, Ristic AD, Imazio M, et al. Management strategies in pericardial emergencies. Herz. 2006;31:891–900.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rozycki GS, Feliciano DV, Schmidt JA, Cushman JG, Sisley AC, Ingram W. The role of surgeon-performed ultrasound in patients with possible cardiac wounds. Ann Surg. 1996;223:737–746.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tayal VS, Kline JA. Emergency echocardiography to detect pericardial effusion in patients in PEA and near-PEA states. Resuscitation. 2003;59(3):315–318.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tsang TS. Rescue echocardiography guided pericardiocentesis for cardiac performation complications catheter-based procedures: the Mayo Clinic Experience. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:1345–1350.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tsang TS, Enriquez-Sarano M, Freeman WK, et al. Consecutive 1127 therapeutic echocardiographically guided pericardiocentesis: clinical profile, practice patterns, and outcomes spanning 21 years. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77:429–436.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Price S, Via G, Sloth E, World Interactive Network Focused on Critical UltraSound ECHO-ICU Group, et al. Echocardiography practice, training and accreditation in the intensive care: document for the World Interactive Network Focused on Critical Ultrasound (WINFOCUS). Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2008;6:49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hanbidge AE, Lynch D, Wilson SR. US of the peritoneum. Radiographics. 2003;23:663–685.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mallory A, Schaefer JF. Complications of diagnostic paracentesis in patients with liver diseases. JAMA. 1978;239:628–630.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryWright State University – Boonshoft School of MedicineDaytonUSA

Personalised recommendations