Skip to main content

Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Bedside Procedures for the Intensivist
  • 1143 Accesses

Abstract

Malnutrition is a common problem in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Enteral nutrition has been shown to be superior to improve morbidity and mortality rates compared to parenteral nutrition.1 Enteral feeding prevents gut atrophy and bacterial translocation, thereby reducing infectious complications, such as pneumonias and intra-abdominal abscesses.1 Traditionally, long-term enteral access for nutrition was provided via surgically placed feeding gastrostomy or feeding jejunostomy tubes. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement, as described by Gauder and Ponsky in 1980, is now the method of long-term enteral access for nutrition.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Khaodhiar L, Blackburn G. Enteral nutrition. In: Fischer JE, ed. Mastery of Surgery. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2006:45.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gauderer MW, Ponsky JL, Izant RJ. Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Pediatr Surg. 1980;15:872–875.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Loser C, Aschl G, Hebuterne X, et al. ESPEN guidelines on artificial enteral nutrition – percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Clin Nutr. 2005;24:848–861.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Erdil A, Saka M, Ates Y, et al. Enteral nutrition via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and nutritional status of patients: five year prospective study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;20:1002–1007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mincheff T. Metastatic spread to a percutaneous gastrostomy site from head and neck cancer: case report and literature review. JSLS. 2005;9:466–471.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lin HS, Ibrahim HZ, Kheng JW, Fee WE, Terris DJ. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: Strategies for prevention and management of complications. Laryngoscope. 2001;111:1847–1852.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Park R, Allison M, Lang J, et al. Randomised comparison of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and nasogastric tube feeding in patients with persisting neurological dysphagia. BMJ. 1992;304:1406–1409.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Loser C, Wolters S, Folsch U. Enteral long-term nutrition via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in 210 patients: a four year prospective study. Dig Dis Sci. 1998;43:2549–2557.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Suzuki Y, Urashima M, Ishibashi Y. Covering the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube prevents peristomal infection. World J Surg. 2006;30:1450–1458.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sharma V, Howden C. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of antibiotic prophylaxis before percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95(11):3133–3136.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schrag S, Sharma R, Jaik N, et al. Complications related to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes. A comprehensive clinical review. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2007;16:407–418.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Foutch P, Talbert G, Waring J, Sanowski RA. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with prior abdominal surgery: virtues of the safe tract. Am J Gastroenterol. 1988;83:147–150.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Russell T, Brotman M, Norris F. Percutaneous gastrostomy: a new simplified and cost-effective technique. Am J Surg. 1984;148:132–137.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sabnis A, Liu R, Chand B, Ponsky J. SLiC Technique: a novel approach to percutaneous gastrostomy. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:256–262.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Choudhry U, Barde C, Markert R, Gopalswamy N. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a randomized prospective comparison of early and delayed feeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;44:164–167.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Stein J, Schulte-Bockholt A, Sabin M, Keymling M. A randomized prospective trial of immediate vs. next day feeding after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in intensive care patients. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28:1656–1660.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kozarek R, Ball T, Ryan J Jr. When push comes to shove: a comparison between two methods of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Am J Gastroenterol. 1986;81:642–646.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Alley J, Corneille M, Stewart R, Dent D. Pneumoperitoneum after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients in the intensive care unit. Am Surg. 2007;73:765–768.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wiesen A, Sideridis K, Fernandes A, et al. True incidence and clinical significance of pneumoperitoneum after PEG placement: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:886–889.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shahid Shafi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lang, J., Shafi, S. (2010). Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy. In: Frankel, H., deBoisblanc, B. (eds) Bedside Procedures for the Intensivist. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79830-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79830-1_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-79829-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-79830-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics