Skip to main content

General Considerations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1142 Accesses

Abstract

As ICU patient volume and acuity increase, there has been a parallel growth in the use of technology to assist in management. Several issues must be considered when determining where and how to perform certain procedures in critically ill and injured patients. Much forethought and planning are required to establish a successful intensive care unit (ICU)-based procedural environment – from concerns regarding the availability and reliability of pertinent equipment to more complex issues of acquiring competency and pursuing credentialing. It is essential to pay adequate attention to these general ­considerations to ensure that ICU-based procedures are accomplished with equivalent safety and results as those performed in more traditional settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Grover A, Robbins J, Bendick P, et al. Open versus percutaneous ­dilational tracheostomy: efficacy and cost analysis. Am Surg. 2001;67(4):297–301.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Upadhyay A, Maurer J, Turner J, et al. Elective bedside tracheostomy in the intensive care unit. J Am Coll Surg. 1996;183(1):51–55.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jones PW, Moyers J, Rogers J, et al. Ultrasound guided thoracentesis: is it a safer method? Chest. 2003;123(2):418–423.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hind D, Calvert N, McWilliams R, et al. Ultrasonic devices for central venous cannulations: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2003;327(7411):361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Society of Critical Care Medicine. Guidelines for granting privileges for the performance of procedures in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 1993;19(2):275–278.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Martin LD, Howell R, Ziegelstein R, et al. Hospitalist performance of cardiac hand-carried ultrasound after focused training. Am J Med. 2007;120(11):1000–1004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gunst M, Sperry J, Ghaemmaghami V, et al. Accuracy of cardiac function and volume status estimates using the bedside echocardiographic assessment in trauma / critical care: the BEAT exam. J Trauma. 2007;63(6):1432.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mazareshahi RM, Farmer JC, Porembka D, et al. A suggested curriculum in echocardiography for critical care physicians. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(8 Supp):S431–S433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Alexander JH, Peterson E, Chen A, et al. Feasibility of point-of-care echocardiography by internal medicine house staff. Am Heart H. 2004;147(3):476–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Langlois SLP, FRANZCR. Focused ultrasound training for clinicians. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(5 suppl):S138–S143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gardiner Q, White PS, Carson A, et al. Technique training: endoscopic percutaneous tracheostomy. Br J Anaesth. 1998;81(3):401–403.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Indeck M, Peterson S, Smith J, et al. Risk, cost and benefit of transporting ICU patients for special studies. J Trauma. 1988;28(7):1020–1025.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Damm C, Vandelet P, Petit J, et al. Complications [Complications during the intrahospital transport in critically ill patients. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2005;24(1):24–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jaramillo EJ, Trevino JM, Berghoff KR, et al. Bedside diagnostic ­laparoscopy in the intensive care unit: a 13-year experience. J Soc ­Laparoendoscopic Surg. 2006;10(2):155–159.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Simpson, Day, Jewkes, et al. The impact of percutaneous tracheostomy on intensive care unit practice and training. Anaesthesia 1999;54(2):186–189.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hunter M. Peripherally inserted central catheter placement at the speed of sound. Nutr Clin Pract. 2007;22(4):406–411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Carr BG, Dean A, Everett W, et al. Intensivist bedside ultrasound (INBU) for volume assessment in the intensive care unit: a pilot study. J Trauma. 2007;63(3):495–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nicolaou S, Talsky A, Khashoggi K, et al. Ultrasound-guided interventional radiology in critical care. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(5 Suppl):S186–S197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Berenholtz SM, Pronovost P, Lipsett P, et al. Eliminating catheter-related bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(10):2014–2020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sing RF, Smith C, Miles W, et al. Preliminary results of bedside inferior vena cava filter placement: safe and cost-effective. Chest. 1998;114(1):315–316.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nussbaum MS. Invited lecture: American Board of Surgery Maintenance of Certification explained. Am J Surg. 2008;195:284–287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Neri L, Storti E, Lichtensetein D, et al. Toward an ultrasound curriculum for critical care medicine. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(5 suppl):S290–S304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Powner DJ. Credentialing for critical care in small hospitals. Crit Care Med. 2001;29(8):1630–1632.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sloan FA, Conover C, Provenzale D, et al. Hospital credentialing and quality of care. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50(1):77–88.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kovacs G. Procedural skills in medicine: Linking theory to practice. J Emerg Med. 1997;15(3):387–391.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Eisen DM, Baron T, Dominitz J, et al. Methods of granting hospital privileges to perform gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55(7):780–783.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sharma VK, Coppola A, Raufman J, et al. A survey of credentialing practices of gastrointestinal endoscopy centers in the United States. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2005;39(6):501–507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Sedation and ­Analgesia by Non-Anesthesiologists. Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology. 2002;96(4):1004–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Soifer BE. Procedural Anesthesia at the bedside. Crit Care Clin. 2000;16(1):7–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Brady M, Kinn S, O’Rourke K, Stuart P. Preoperative fasting for adults to prevent perioperative complications. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD004423. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004423

    Google Scholar 

  31. Brady M, Kinn S, O’Rourke K, Randhawa N, Stuart P. Preoperative fasting for preventing perioperative complications in children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD005285. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005285

    Google Scholar 

  32. Davis N, Pohlman A, Gehlbach B, et al. Improving the process of informed consent in the critically ill. JAMA. 2003;289(15):1963-1968.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Fan E, Shahid S, Kondreddi V, et al. Informed consent in the critically ill: a two-step approach incorporation delirium screening. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(1):94–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Universal Protocol for Preventing Wrong Site, Wrong Procedure, Wrong Person Surgery. http://www.jointcommission.org/PatientSafety/UniversalProtocol as accessed on 4/23/08

  35. Michaels RK, Makary M, Dahab Y, et al. Achieving the National Quality Forum’s “Never Events”: prevention of wrong site, wrong procedure, and wrong patient operations. Ann Surg. 2007;245(4):526–532.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Clarke JR, Johnston J, Finley E, et al. Getting surgery right. Ann Surg. 2007;246(3):395–403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Egorova NN, Moskowitz A, Gelijns A, et al. Managing the prevention of retained surgical instruments – what is the value of counting? Ann Surg. 2008;247(1):13–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ponrartana S, Coakley F, Yeh B, et al. Accuracy of plain abdominal radiographs in the detection of retained surgical needles in the peritoneal cavity. Ann Surg. 2008;247(1):8–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Greenberg CC, Diaz-Flores R, Lipsitz S, et al. Bar-coding surgical sponges to improve safety: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2008;247(4):612–616.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Dellinger EP, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter related infections. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2002;51(RR-10):1–29

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Edwards PS, Lipp A, Holmes A. Preoperative skin antiseptics for preventing surgical wound infections after clean surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;3:CD003949

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Moylan JA, Fitzpatrick KT, Davenport KE. Reducing wound infections. Improved gown and drape barrier performance. Arch Surg. 1987;122(2):152–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Webster J, Alghamdi AA. Use of plastic adhesive drapes during surgery for preventing surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;4:CD006353.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Bratzler DW, Dale W, Houck PM, et al. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection ­Prevention Project. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38(12):1706–1715.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bratzler DW, Houck PM, Surgical Infection Prevention Guidelines ­Writers Workgroups. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. Am J Surg. 2005;189(4):395–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Fein JA, Ganesh J, Alpern ER. Medical staff attitudes toward family presence during pediatric procedures. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2004;20(4):224–227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Bradford KK, Kost S, Selbst S, et al. Family member presence for procedures: the resident’s perspective. Ambul Pediatr. 2005;5(5):294–297.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Shapira M, Tamir AD. Presence of family member during endoscopy. What do patients and escorts think? J Clin Gastroenterol. 1996;22(4):272–274.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. MacLean SL, Guzzetta CE, White C, et al. Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and invasive procedures: practices of critical care and emergency nurses. Am J Crit Care. 2003;12(3):246–257.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heidi L. Frankel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Frankel, H.L., Hamill, M.E. (2010). General Considerations. In: Frankel, H., deBoisblanc, B. (eds) Bedside Procedures for the Intensivist. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79830-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79830-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-79829-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-79830-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics