Advertisement

Toward a Practice of Mindfulness

Part of the Food Microbiology and Food Safety book series (FMFS)

There's more than a grain of truth to the saying that when all you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail. —(Weick & Sutcliffe, 2007, p. 90)

Bazerman and Watkins (2004) characterize risk management with the apparent oxymoron of “predictable surprises” (p. 1). In other words, risk situations are fraught with potential harm, yet the inherent uncertainty of risk means we can never know when or if a problem will erupt. A mindfulapproach to risk management accounts for both the looming threat and intrinsic uncertainty present in all risk situations. By contrast, the “rigid reliance on old categories”. results in routine or mindless reactions that are insensitive to emerging risks (Langer, 1989a, p. 63). Pragmatically, a mindful approach requires that risk managers sustain a “high level of sensitivity to errors, unexpected events, and—more generally—to subtle cues suggested by the organization's environment or its own processes” (Levinthal & Rerup, 2006, p. 503). This...

Keywords

Organizational Learning Organizational Member Bandwagon Effect Mindful State High Reliability Organization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Argyris, C. (2001). Good communication that blocks learning. In Harvard business review on organizational learning (pp. 87–110). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School PublishingCorporation.Google Scholar
  2. Bazerman, M. H., & Watkins, M. D. (2004). Predictable surprises: The disasters you should have seen coming and how to prevent them. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  3. Burgoon, J. K., Berger, C. R., & Waldron, V. R. (2000). Mindfulness and interpersonal communication. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 105–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Butler, B. S., & Gray, P. H. (2006). Reliability, mindfulness, and information systems. MIS Quarterly, 30(2), 211–224.Google Scholar
  5. Fiol, C. M., & O'Connor, E. J. (2003). Waking up! Mindfulness in the face of bandwagons [Electronic version]. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 54–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Huber, G. P. (1996). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. In M. D. Cohen, & L. S. Sproull (Eds.), Organizational learning (pp. 124–162). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Johnson, D., & Sellnow, T. (1995). Deliberative rhetoric as a step in organizational crisis management: Exxon as a case study. Communication Reports, 8(1), 53–60.Google Scholar
  8. Langer, E. J. (1989a). Mindfulness. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  9. Langer, E. J. (1989b). Minding matters: The consequences of mindlessness-mindfulness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental psychology (pp. 137–173). San Diego, CA:Academic Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  10. Langer, E. J. (1997). The power of mindful learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  11. Langer, E. J., & Moldoveanu, M. (2000). The contrast of mindfulness. Journal of Social Issues,56(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Langer, E. J., & Piper, A. I. (1987). Prevention of mindlessness [Electronic version].Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 53(2), 280–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Levinthal, D., & Rerup, C. (2006). Crossing an apparent chasm: Bridging mindful and less-mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organization Science, 17, 502–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Seiling, J., & Hinrichs, G. (2005). Mindfulness and constructive accountability as critical elements of effective sensemaking: A new imperative for leaders as sensemanagers. OrganizationalDevelopment Journal, 23(3), 82–88.Google Scholar
  15. Sellnow, T. L., & Brand, J. D. (2001). Establishing the structure of reality for an industry: Model and anti-model arguments as advocacy in Nike's crisis communication. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29, 278–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sitkin, S. B. (1996). Learning through failure: The strategy of small losses. In M. D. Cohen, &L. S. Sproull (Eds.), Organizational learning (pp. 541–578). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Thomas, D. C. (2006). Domain and development of cultural intelligence: The importance ofmindfulness. Group & Organization Management, 31(1), 78–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Thomas, T., Schermerhorn, J. R., Jr., & Dienhart, J. W. (2004). Strategic leadership of ethical behavior in business. Academy of Management Executive, 18(2), 56–66.Google Scholar
  19. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Weick, K. E., & Putnam, T. (2006). Organizing for mindfulness: Eastern wisdom and western knowledge. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15(3), 275–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Weick, K. E., & Roberts, K. H. (2001). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. In K. E. Weick (Ed.), Making sense in the organization (pp. 259–283). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
  22. Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2007). Managing the unexpected: Resilient performance in an age of uncertainty (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jon Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Personalised recommendations